Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Cry 'Woof'

CT 17: God Neither the Form of a Body nor a Force in a Body

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 3:47 pm   by willduquette

CT 17: God Neither the Form of a Body nor a Force in a Body 2014-12-23T15:47:32-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

And so we continue the long march through the categories, showing that God isn’t any of the normal things of our experience.  We’ve shown in the past that God isn’t a species predicated of individuals, so He isn’t the essence of an individual being.  We’ve shown that God isn’t a body that has an essence.  And now we see that God isn’t something that pertains to a body in some other way:

God cannot be the form of a body or any kind of force existing in a body. For, since all bodies are found to be mobile, whatever is present in a body must be moved, at least per accidens or concomitantly, if the body itself is moved. The first mover, however, cannot be moved either per se or per accidens, for it must be absolutely immobile, as has been shown. Therefore God cannot be a body or a force in a body.

So remember: a body is a substance that takes up space, a composite of a substantial form, or essence, with matter.  In addition to its substantial form, though, a body can have all sorts of accidental forms.  An apple has the essence of an apple; but it can also be red or yellow or green or a combination.  It can be in motion (as when Sam throws it at Bill Ferny) or at rest.  It can be sour, ripe, or rotten.  In Thomas’ terms, these colors and motions and states are all accidental forms.

Now, when you throw an apple, its green color and its sourness and the momentum you impart to it all travel along with it.  If you think about it, they really can’t do otherwise.  I can imagine a smile without a cat, but an apple that leaves its color behind when throw would be a very odd apple indeed.

And since, as Thomas showed in Chapter 4, God is absolutely immobile, and since every body, being in space, is subject to motion, and since all of a body’s forms move with it, God cannot be such a form.

Thomas also says that God cannot be a force in a body, by which I gather he would mean something like a muscular force, something that’s part of the body itself that causes change.  Because that must also move with the body, and God is immobile.

Thomas continues:

Again, in order to move an object, every mover must have dominion over the thing that is moved. For we observe that motion is more rapid in proportion as the motive force exceeds the resisting force of the mobile object.

“Every mover must have dominion over the thing that is moved.”  This statement is almost more interesting viewed backwards than forwards.  Every mover must have power over, must have the ability to change, must in some sense be superior to the thing that is moved.  The hand must have the strength to throw the ball.  A tree grows of itself, and thereby, according to this maxim, has dominion over itself; at best I can provide or remove the necessary conditions.  And similarly, I have dominion over myself, and can determine my own movements.

Therefore that which is the very first among all movers, must predominate supremely over all the things moved.

Taking dominion to mean “the power to move”, this seems reasonable.

But this would be impossible if the mover were in any way attached to the mobile object, as it would have to be if it were the form or motive power of the latter. Consequently the first mover cannot be a body or a force in a body or a form in a body.

Now here we get to an interesting point.  As a human being, I have dominion over myself, and can so determine my own actions.  But I do so by virtue of my nature as a human being, by virtue of my species, my substantial form, my essence, call it what you will.  I do not do so by virtue of any accidental form or force that I’m currently manifesting.  An apple is red because it has ripened; but the turning red didn’t cause the ripeness.  Rather, both the red and the ripeness flow from the apple’s nature as an apple.

And so, once again, God cannot be an accidental form.  And this has interesting implications:

This is why Anaxagoras postulated an intelligence liberated from matter, that it might rule and move all things.

And indeed we will see that God (who is not a body, and is not composed of form and matter) yet has intellect and will.

Believing Thomas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post



November 25, 2014

On Praying for What You Really Want

Next Post



November 27, 2014 Thanksgiving Day


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites build while Moses was on Mount Sinai?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A golden calf An altar A temple A tower

Related posts from Cry 'Woof'

Catholic

Today's Aquinas: Form Over Matter

Cry 'Woof'

Catholic

Today's Aquinas: Only God can Create

Cry 'Woof'

Catholic

Today's Aquinas: Something from Nothing

Cry 'Woof'

Catholic

Today's Aquinas: The Chicken or the Egg

Cry 'Woof'

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube