CT 12: God Not Contained Under Any Genus

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 4:21 pm by willduquette

CT 12: God Not Contained Under Any Genus 2014-12-23T16:21:21-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

In the previous chapter, Thomas shows that God’s essence is simply existence itself, ipsum esse, a point he’d been working up to for some chapters. In this chapter and several that follow, he’s concerned to prove some corollaries, and to situate God within certain traditional metaphysical categories—or, more accurately, to show that He is a special case, and the standard categories don’t really apply.

In our look at Chapter 10, on the identity of God with His essence, we necessarily spent time looking at the notions of genus and species as metaphysically understood. You might wish to go back and review.

We infer from the above that God is not contained as a species within any genus. Species is constituted by specific difference added to genus. Hence the essence of any species possesses something over and above its genus. But existence itself, ipsum esse, which is God’s essence, does not comprise within itself any factor that is added to some other factor. Accordingly God is not a species of any genus.

As Thomas says, a species is distinguished from the genus that contains it by a specific difference. An apple tree and a cherry tree are both fruit trees, but an apple tree bears apples and a cherry tree does not. That specific difference is added to the basic notion of fruit tree. But mere existence, mere being, is ultimately the root of all categories: it is undifferentiated being. And so, since God is existence Himself, there is no specific difference in Him, and so He isn’t a species.

You might say, wait: a species is a set of individuals. How could one being be a species to begin with? It’s a good question, and one which puzzled me mightily; and the answer will come rather later on in this series. For now, the necessary point is that Thomas is ruling out a whole host of possible ways of misunderstanding God, and this is one of them.

Thomas continues,

Furthermore, since genus potentially contains specific differences, in every being composed of genus and differences, act is commingled with potency. But we have shown that God is pure act without any commingling of potency. (Cf. chap. 9.) Therefore His essence is not composed of genus and differences; and so He is not in any genus.

We’ve see this argument before, and will see it again. Species is a composition of genus and specific difference; and every true composition ultimately is a composition of act and potency. We’ve already established that God is pure unchanging actuality; and hence, by reduction ad absurdum we see that He cannot be a species within a genus.

Next time, we’ll see that not only is He not a species, He’s not a genus either.

Believing Thomas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

September 14, 2014

The Terrible Contradiction of Staffing

Next Post

September 16, 2014 Review: Post Captain, by Patrick O'Brian

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown in a lion's den and survived?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Paul Daniel Joshua