Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cry 'Woof'

Home
Catholic
CT 11: Identity of Essence and Existence in God

CT 11: Identity of Essence and Existence in God

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 4:24 pm by willduquette

CT 11: Identity of Essence and Existence in God 2014-12-23T16:24:01-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

Having noted that God is His essence, Thomas continues,

God’s essence cannot be other than His existence. In any being whose essence is distinct from its existence, what it is must be distinct from that whereby it is. For in virtue of a thing’s existence we say that it is, and in virtue of its essence we say what it is. This is why a definition that signifies an essence manifests what a thing is. In God, however, there is no distinction between what He is and that whereby He is, since there is no composition in Him, as has been shown. Therefore God’s essence is nothing else than His existence.

God is infinite, which is to say unbounded; our finite human intellects cannot encompass Him. Thus, although He is simple in Himself, having no separable pieces, we have to speak of Him under multiple categories. We speak of His essence, of His existence, of His goodness, of His truth; but really, in all of this, we are speaking solely of Him in one way in which He makes Himself known to us.

Given this, it shouldn’t be surprising that God’s essence is His existence; or, to put it another way, that it is His essence to exist. After all, everything we can say about Him is really just the one thing.

But above, Thomas is making a more specific argument than that. An apple is an apple, with the essence of an apple; but this apple on the desk in front of me adds to the essence of an apple the real act of existence. This is a kind of composition, of separation into parts. And this is true for any kind of thing that can come to be. But we’ve already shown that there is no composition in God, nor does He come to be. Therefore, since He exists, and He is simple, His essence must be to exist.

Thomas puts a lot of weight on this conclusion; there’s something special about it, and what it is comes out in the next paragraph, which I’ll take a little at a time.

Likewise, we have proved that God is pure act without any admixture of potentiality.

Indeed we have. By this time, this should be a commonplace.

Accordingly His essence must be the ultimate act in Him; for any act that has a bearing on the ultimate act, is in potency to that ultimate act.

What does Thomas mean by ultimate act?

In Thomas’ philosophy, as in Aristotle’s, every change has four causes: the material cause (that which changes), the formal cause (that which it changes into), the efficient cause (that which triggers the change), and the final cause, or goal.

In material things, the final cause is often rather trivial; stones have no desires. In persons, beings with intellect and will, the final cause may be rather remote from the current change: for example, I pack a lunch to take to work, so that I can eat lunch at lunch time, so that I’ll be able to think clearly during the afternoon and won’t get hungry before dinner, and ultimately, so that I don’t die of starvation.

So when God acts, what the ultimate end of that chain of final causality?

But the ultimate act is existence itself, ipsum esse. For, since all motion is an issuing forth from potency to act, the ultimate act must be that toward which all motion tends; and since natural motion tends to what is naturally desired, the ultimate act must be that which all desire. This is existence.

The ultimate act, the ultimate end, is existence: so says Thomas. And it’s hard to argue with that. Certainly, I eat, ultimately, so that I can go on living, so that I can remain in this state of existence.

Consequently the divine essence, which is pure and ultimate act, must be existence itself, ipsum esse.

And if everything that is tends ultimately to existence as its ultimate act, how much more so for God, whose perfections are stamped on everything that is?

Aristotle wrote a book called the Categories, which is all about the different ways there are to exist, to be. But the most basic thing is being itself. And that, Thomas has just shown, is God. He is ipsum esse, existence itself.

Believing Thomas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

September 7, 2014

The Glorious Multiplicity of Creation

Next Post

September 9, 2014 Review: Master and Commander, by Patrick O'Brian

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king rebuilt the high places Solomon had built for foreign gods?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Josiah Hezekiah Jehu Manasseh