CT 10.3: Essence is no Accident

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 5:08 pm by willduquette

CT 10.3: Essence is no Accident 2014-12-23T17:08:40-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re blogging through St. Thomas Aquinas’ Compendium Theologiae, sometimes called his Shorter Summa. Find the previous posts here.

(In the previous two posts we looked at what it means for a thing to have an essence (what it is) as distinct from its accidents (the things by which it differs from other members of its species, starting with location); and also at what Thomas means by genus and species. You might want to go back and refresh your memory.)

In any being, therefore, in which there are not found two factors whereof one is per se and the other per accidens, its essence must be altogether identical with it.

When you take away the accidents, the essence is all that’s left; and if the thing is such that it cannot have any accidents, it must be identical to its essence. It must simply be what it essentially is. I am essentially human, but I am not simply human; I am this human, sitting in this room, typing at this computer. The things by which I differ from other humans (and especially my location) are my accidents, not my essence. But a thing with no accidents has no way to be different than its essence, and so simply is its essence.

In God, however, since He is simple, as has been shown, there are not found two factors whereof one is per se and the other per accidens. Therefore His essence must be absolutely the same as He Himself.

But God is simple; there is no composition of two parts in Him, no room for accidents as distinct from essence. And so He must be His essence.

Thomas then looks at it another way, as usual.

Moreover, whenever an essence is not absolutely identical with the thing of which it is the essence, something is discerned in that thing that has the function of potency, and something else that has the function of act. For an essence is formally related to the thing of which it is the essence as humanity is related to man. In God. however, no potency and act can be discerned: He is pure act. Accordingly He is His essence.

When we do find a thing that’s a composite, we usually (always?) find a combination of actuality and potentiality. An apple is actually an apple (its essence) and thus has the potential of ripening, of rotting, of being eaten. But God, Thomas has already shown, is unchanging. There is, in Him, no potency for change, and thus he cannot be composite in this way.

Anything you see around you, wherever you’re sitting while reading this, is a composite of essence and accidents, and is therefore not identical with its essence. Surprisingly, there are beings other than God that are identical with their essence; but that comes much later in the book.

Believing Thomas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

August 31, 2014

Quill v0.2.0 Release

Next Post

September 2, 2014 Review: Ancient Shores, by Jack McDevitt

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote the Book of Acts?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mark Luke Peter Paul