Review: Scholastic Metaphysics, by Ed Feser

Last updated on: June 10, 2014 at 3:00 am by willduquette

Review: Scholastic Metaphysics, by Ed Feser 2014-06-08T17:01:15-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Prof. Ed Feser’s latest book is Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. I think enough of Prof. Feser that I pre-ordered it a couple of months before publication; and when it arrived I began reading it on my lunch break and other odd moments. I find that that’s the right approach for books of philosophy; I can’t take it all in at once, I need time to ponder and let things settle.

First, some background. Scholastic philosophy is the philosophy of the “schoolmen” of the Middle Ages. These days the most prominent of the schoolmen is St. Thomas Aquinas, but there were many others, including such figures as Thomas’ friend St. Bonaventure (a Franciscan), John Duns Scotus (from whose name, used in the ironic sense, we get the word “dunce”), and William of Occam, he of the much touted razor.

Scholastic philosophy remained dominant in the West until the days of Descartes, who decided that it was too complicated and well overdue for a reboot. It was later revived in the days of Pope Leo and in the 20th Century found defenders like Jacques Maritain, Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, and Etienne Gilson; and now, in the early 21st Century, Ed Feser (among others). Feser’s point is that Scholasticism was never disproved; rather, it was abandoned, and it is worth rediscovering. On his view, many of the standard problems of modern philosophy (e.g., the “mind-body” problem) are quite adequately answered by Thomism, and indeed would never have seemed problematic.

Feser has written quite a lot about Scholasticism in the past, particularly in his book Aquinas, which is an introduction to Thomas Aquinas and his philosophy, and in The Last Superstition, a perhaps overly polemical refutation of the “New Atheists”. The current book is broader in its intent, and much less polemical. Viewing Scholasticism, and more particularly Thomism, as a live option for the 21st or any other century, Feser’s goal is to give an introduction to Scholastic thought, placing it in context with respect to other more popular schools of philosophy. In this particular book he’s focusing on metaphysics, the study of Being itself; I gather that it is intended to be the first of several.

For each topic, then, Feser follows more or less this plan: he presents the Thomist view; then he talks about the views of Duns Scotus and other prominent scholastics (where they differ with Thomas) and explains why he finds the Thomist view to be the correct one; and then he relates the whole to other modern strains of philosophy, some of which are beginning, slowly and painfully, to accept as necessary, ideas that Thomas would have found commonplace.

Me, I not only enjoyed the book thoroughly, I wanted more. I recognize that I am, perhaps, not typical in this regard. (Ahem.)

For those, though, who are philosophically minded, and who want to explore the ideas I’ve been discussing in my posts on St. Thomas Aquinas over the last couple months, I recommend it highly. It should perhaps not be the first book you read, though. I’d suggest tackling Jacques Maritain’s Introduction to Philosophy first, and probably Feser’s Aquinas. You might also enjoy reading G.K. Chesterton’s Aquinas: The Dumb Ox, which is more about the man and less about the philosophy, but which is eminently sane.

Woof Guide to Philosophy

ed feser

Scholastic Metaphysics

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

June 9, 2014

CT 4.1: The Immobility of God

Next Post

June 11, 2014 Watchman For Daybreak Watch

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is credited with predicting Cyrus by name, who would rebuild Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Zechariah Isaiah Ezekiel Jeremiah