The Long and the Short of Infinite Regressions

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 5:41 pm by willduquette

The Long and the Short of Infinite Regressions 2014-12-23T17:41:09-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One of my favorite philosophy bloggers is James Chastek at Just Thomism. I find his posts more challenging than Ed Feser‘s (one of my other favorites); Feser’s usually going out of his to explain Thomism (and Scholastic philosophy in general) to those outside the tradition, while Chastek’s posts are more usually reflections or even meditations on something he’s been pondering. As such they take longer to read and appreciate, and far too often I don’t make the attempt. I’ve long thought that I should go back to the beginning of his blog (which goes back to 2004, long before I started reading him) and read through it a little a time. And in February of 2004, I found a gem called “A False Inference About Infinite Regressions“; it’s especially apropos given my recent posts about Aquinas’ proofs for God’s existence:

We prove the existence of God By showing the impossibility of certain things having an infinite regress (Motion, causality, contingency…etc.)

One of the most common inferences from this is that God’s causality in things must be very far away. After all, we are only sure that the causes are not infinite. How many are there then? Billions?

When I was discussing this proof with a class yesterday, everyone in the class was quietly convinced that this God, even if he existed, must be very far away. If God acted on the here and now, he only did so with a very long pair of fire tongs, or through a universe of middle men.

This comes from thinking in terms of creation as something that happened a long, long time I ago. I was caused by my parents, who were caused by their parents, and so on, and so on, and so on, back to the Big Bang or the Garden of Eden, as you prefer. But that’s what St. Thomas calls a per accidens chain of causes, and one that (pace revelation) could theoretically go on infinitely.

But in fact, God is much closer to us than that.

But this is to profoundly misunderstand the proof. If we actually follow out lines of causality are probably not more than five intermediate causes between any action or being and God (very often there are none). All things which reduce to some natural motion or desire are in immediate contact with the Divine causality, for nature is nothing other than an openness to be moved by the divine mind in a certain way.

This is only to say that if there are intermediate causes, there usually are not many between the first and the final. To deny an infinite regress is not to assert an immense one.

I, as a human being, am sustained in being directly by God (just as is everything in the cosmos). There are no links in the chain between me and God; He’s right there. When I move my hand, my will moves my hand, and my hand moves the shovel, and the shovel moves the dirt. But God sustains me in being, and thus allows me to will to move my hand.

God is closer than you might think.

* So I was looking for a picture of a father walking with his son, hand-in-hand. Oddly, virtually all of the pictures that popped up were of storm troopers. (shrug)

Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse

Links to This and That

Woof Guide to Philosophy

ed feser

infinite regress

james chastek

Previous Post

May 27, 2014

Review: Killing Rommel, by Steven Pressfield

Next Post

May 29, 2014 Word I Wish I'd Written: Sweaters

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What year was the King James Bible first published?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1611 1492 1701 1517