A Compendium of Simplicity—Wait, What?

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 6:03 pm by willduquette

A Compendium of Simplicity—Wait, What? 2014-12-23T18:03:05-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Towards the end of his life, Thomas Aquinas began his third summary of the theology of the Catholic Faith. The first, and the most detailed, was his Summa Contra Gentiles, which he wrote to refute the “gentiles”—which is to say, Averroes and Avicenna, who were smart cookies but held erroneous views about Aristotle (at least from a Catholic point of view) and were unintentionally poisoning the well for Thomas and other Catholic Aristotelians. I’ve tried reading parts of the SCG, and it is not for the faint of heart.

Next came his famous masterpiece, the Summa Theologiae, which he did not quite finish. The ST has a distinct and memorable form. For each point of theology, Thomas states all of the objections to it, and sketches the arguments for them; then he states the point of theology, and gives an authority for believing it from scripture or the fathers of the church; then he sketches his own argument for it; and then he sketches his arguments against each of the objections. There are a number of humorous pieces floating about the web, written in the style of Thomas Aquinas, and they all follow this form.

The essential thing to know about the ST is that the arguments presented in it are (as I indicated above) no more than sketches of arguments presented in full elsewhere (and often by other authorities). It was never meant to stand alone, but to be at once a statement of Catholic theology and a kind of index to the relevant authorities: a convenience and aid for new students of theology.

And then, toward the end of his life, he began the Compendium Theologiae, a much shorter and simpler statement of Catholic theology intended “for the sake of those whose time is taken up with the cares of daily life,” that is, those who could not devote the majority of their time to study. The CT is written in a simpler style, and omits most of the objects. The arguments are presented even more briefly, and with less discussion.

All of this makes the CT deceptively more approachable than the ST or SCG. The first two “chapters”, in which Thomas explains what he is about, are straightforward and pleasant; and then, in the third “chapter” he drops you in the deep end without any kind of life preserver save your faith in the Almighty

The CT truly is more approachable, mind you; but though it is written in bite-sized pieces, it is extremely dense. More than that, it assumes (along with all of Thomas’ writings) that the author has some notion of Aristotelian philosophy—as understood by Thomas. For though Thomas made extensive use of philosophy, and was a skilled philosopher, he was writing theology. The philosophy comes in only as needed, but it comes in everywhere, and there’s quite a lot to pick up.

Ultimately, though, the only way to pick it up is to dig in and wrestle with it and ask questions of it; and if you do it in public then sometimes helpful people pitch in and set you straight. So that’s my plan over the next while, is to dig back into the CT, presenting my reflections.

With luck, others will find it interesting too (though I notice no one has responded to yesterday’s post.)

For those who want to follow along, you can find the CT on-line at the link above, and it’s available in print and as an e-book. I’ll generally be using the translation by Cyril Vollert, S.J.

Thomas Aquinas

compendium theologiae

Thomas Aquinas

Previous Post

April 14, 2014

Blogging Aquinas

Next Post

April 16, 2014 Riding the Rigatoni Cycle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who urged Esther to approach the king, saying, "For such a time as this"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mordecai Ezra Nehemiah Haggai