City of the Beasts

Last updated on: December 23, 2014 at 11:35 pm by willduquette

City of the Beasts 2014-12-23T23:35:13-05:00 willduquette

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A rare negative book review from January, 2003, of Isabel Allende’s City of the Beasts. I find that I still feel the same way a decade later.

Fifteen-year-old Alexander Cold’s mother has cancer and is going to a special clinic with Alexander’s father; he and his sisters get dispatched to live with aunts for duration. In Alexander’s case, it means that he accompanies his eccentric, acerbic Aunt Kate on an expedition to the farthest reaches of the Amazon River, in search of a murderous sasquatch-like creature called “The Beast”. Ultimately the expedition encounters an Indian tribe, the People of the Mist, who have always eschewed contact with outsiders—and also with “The Beasts”, a race of creatures the People of the Mist worship as gods.

There’s a lot to like in this book; once Allende gets past the first couple of chapters, which are completely atrocious (I nearly stopped reading, and only continued because my sister gave me the book for Christmas and I wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt) she’s quite a good storyteller. I’m at a bit of a disadvantage, reviewing this book; I’ve never read anything else by Allende, and according to the dust jacket this is her first book for young readers. Thus, I don’t know whether the awful beginning is typical, or whether she forgot to write “down” after she’d gotten a couple of chapters into it.

But be that as it may, there’s a lot to dislike, too. I’ll start with the character Ludovic Leblanc, egotistical anthropologist and blithering idiot. He’s the only scientist in the party, and he’s an imbecile, less interested in what’s before his eyes than what’s in his books. He’s not at all suited for life in the jungle, and he seems to know nothing about it—and yet, he was chosen to lead this expedition because of his vast experience in the field. He’s as two-dimensional as a playing card.

Okay, he’s a badly written character. But it’s the attitude that bugs me—as I say, he’s the only scientist. All through the book, the message is “think with your heart, not your head.” I’m not one to downplay the importance of feelings and intuition, but not using your head is just stupid.

And then there are the People of the Mist, who are portrayed as living a sylvan, idyllic life without modern goods, without modern thoughts, without modern technology. Really, we’re asked, why should they change? Their system has worked for them for thousands of years. They are happy, says Allende. Again, we have the pluralistic, post-modern message: our way is no better than theirs.

In a word: hogwash.

I have three children. Just minutes before my second son was born, the heart rate on the fetal monitor dropped to nearly zero—the umbilical cord was wrapped around his neck. The nurse immediately got Jane to stop pushing, and got her breathing oxygen. Meanwhile, she did what she could to get the baby to shift position. It worked—she got him untangled, and he was born safely. Had there been no fetal monitor, likely he would have been stillborn—a little baby boy, perfectly developed and ready to be born, dead of a stupid accident minutes before birth.

I’ll take modern technology, thank you. I’ll take Western Civilization, with all of its Dead White Males, against whatever pap the multi-culti crowd are pushing these days. It works, better than anything else we’ve come up with. And I’ll tell you, sitting here in my warm study, in a comfortable chair, with my little girl gurgling in her playpen, is much more pleasant than living in the jungle, “in harmony with nature”, worshipping the spirits in every plant and animal and worshipping giant ground sloths as gods.

Sorry, Isabel. No, thank you.

Blasts from the Past

Shakers of Salt

Woof Guide to Literature

books

family

writing

Previous Post

October 25, 2013

Knights vs. Snails

Next Post

October 27, 2013 Bootstrapping the Interior Life: Grace

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Admin App o' the Morning Ask the Dogmat Believing Thomas Bits of Fiction Blasts from the Past Bootstrapping the Interior Life Catholic Mom Christian Living Deep Thoughts from the Doghouse Dominicana Evangelii Gaudium Interviews It Was A Dark and Stormy Night Links to This and That Lumen Fidei Meme Watch On Writing Operation Gratitude Pedant Errant Photography Quill Random Barkings S'Mary's World Shakers of Salt Software Development The Dog Whistler The Dogmat Sez Third Orders Thomas Aquinas Uncategorized Vikings at Dinos Woof Guide to Cinema Woof Guide to History Woof Guide to Literature Woof Guide to Obscure Catholic Music Woof Guide to Philosophy Woof Guide to Popular Music Woof Guide to Technology Woof Guide to Theology Words I Wish I'd Written Works For Me

Select a Month September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian tradition developed the doctrine of the Holy Trinity most systematically?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehovah's Witnesses Quakerism Pentecostalism Nicene Christianity