Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Crux Sola: Formed by Scripture to Live like Christ

Home
Evangelical
Book Review: The New Cambridge Companion to St. Paul (ed. Bruce Longenecker)

Book Review: The New Cambridge Companion to St. Paul (ed. Bruce Longenecker)

Last updated on: August 4, 2020 at 1:41 pm by Nijay Gupta

Book Review: The New Cambridge Companion to St. Paul (ed. Bruce Longenecker) 2020-08-04T13:41:25-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Brand New Cambridge Companion to Paul

In seminary, I cherished my copy of The Cambridge Companion to St. Paul (ed. James D.G. Dunn, 2002). It offered concise overviews of the state of scholarship on various elements of the interpretation of Paul written by leading Pauline experts. Now again, a second version of the book (new topics, new contributors) covers advances, developments, and new conversations in Pauline scholarship over the past 15 years or so.

TOC:

“What Do We Find in Paul’s Letters?” (Bruce Longenecker)

“Who Was Paul?” (Paula Fredriksen)

“What Kind of World Did Paul’s Communities Live In?” (Richard Ascough)

“The Thessalonian and Corinthian Letters” (Margaret MacDonald)

“Galatians and Romans” (Peter Oakes)

“Philippians and Philemon” (Douglas Campbell)

“Colossians and Ephesians” (Sylvia Keesmaat)

“The Pastoral Epistles” (James Aaegeson)

“What Did Paul Think is Wrong in God’s World?” (Longenecker)

“What Did Paul Think God Is Doing about What’s Wrong?” (Michael Gorman)

“What Did Paul Think God Is Doing in Christian Communities?” (Susan G. Eastman)

“How Did Paul Read Scripture?” (David Lincicum)
“Did Paul Abandon either Judaism or Monotheism?” (Matthew Novenson)

“Why Were People Attracted to Paul’s Good News?” (David Horrell)

“How Was the Reception of Paul Shaped in the Early Church?” (Margaret Mitchell)

“What Makes Paul Challenging Today?” (John M.G. Barclay)

Let’s start with all the great things about this new edition, and there are several. First, Longenecker has packed it with top scholars, Eastman, Barclay, Fredriksen, Mitchell, Oakes, Novenson. You can trust that what you are reading is reliable information from experts. Second, the book offers a nice balance of “introduction” (for beginners) and “value added”—a bit of advanced material for people like me who know the basics. Third, I really appreciate the investment in Paul’s theology. One could write a “companion” to Paul and make it just about “history,” “text,” and/or “method.” But Longenecker chose to tackle hot topics like sin, gospel, Paul and Judaism, Paul and the church and person, and more. Indeed, I felt that these chapters will offer the most to readers opening up NCCSP having already studied Paul a bit.

My favorite chapters in this book were these:

Ascough’s “scene-setting” work on the ancient world—he managed to pack in a lot of information in a short space. I would love for my NT intro students to read this for a crash-course in the social world of the Roman Empire. Second, I found Fredriksen’s “Who was Paul?” a wonderful, thought-provoking entree into Paul the person. She has such a fresh perspective and asks a lot of challenging and poignant questions. Third, I liked the addition of Horrell’s question about why people were attracted to Paul’s gospel (esp. gentiles). There was nothing like this in the first Cambridge Companion and most introductions to Paul ignore this issue entirely. Horrell admits the blindspot in scholarship. (I am actually working on a book on this topic right now for Brazos!). Taking the lead from Hurtado, Horrell provides these elements that may have attracted gentiles to Paul’s gospel:

Rescue from immanent divine wrath
Mystical experience (like and unlike local mystery cults)
Salvation, rescue, protection
Missionary zeal and the charisma of Paul (Horrell and Ascough both cite Heidi Wendt’s study as important, At the Temple Gates: The Religion of Freelance Experts in the Roman Empire [OUP, 2016])
Community Meal and Group-Belonging
Appeal to slaves, women, and marginalized

By far my favorite essay was the one by John Barclay on reading Paul in our time, especially with our big cultural questions in view about gender, ethnicity, politics, and power. I think every student of Paul MUST read Barclay’s chapter. But until you get the book, here is a random smattering of things I underlined.

[In 1 Corinthians 1:23-25] Paul…embraces the cruel semiotics of crucifixion—the slow, humiliating execution of a naked man, rendered powerless and degraded to the extreme —in order to challenge the automatic valuation of human power and what he calls ‘wisdom,’ the supposed excellence of reason and communication taken to reside in any civilised culture (301)

Paul does not simply invert these values, to give value to the weak over the strong, or the foolish over the wise, as if there were some inherent value in weakness or folly. His purpose is rather to dislodge the deep-rooted assumption that what counts as valuable in the ‘highest’ cultural systems reflects the natural, created, or divine scheme of things…The alternative value system he promotes is not just the old system turned on its head, but a system of worth created by the ‘calling’ of God, which he elsewhere associates with the grace or gift of God. (301)

“Paul’s theology will always be objectionable to those who consider any kind of hierarchical power in principle wrong” (commenting on Paul’s belief in the Lordship of Christ) (304)

“…the danger of projecting our own political preferences onto his letters is as acute for those on the political left as for those on its right” (305)

“Paul’s greatest political challenge may be to the way that we invest our hopes for salvation in politics; what he questions is the ultimate significance we accord to human behaviour that is inevitably flawed through its entanglement in ‘the present evil age'” (306)

“Paul’s views here [stay in the legal status you are, 1 Cor 7:21-23] clash with the modern consensus that freedom is an intrinsic good, and that slavery is wrong not only for the abuses associated with it, but because it deprives slaves of their fundamental human rights. Paul, we should acknowledge, does not hold to this modern conviction, even if there is some overlap in his language regarding the value of freedom” (308)

“As with slavery, Paul relativises gender distinctions not to erase them, but to render them no longer the most significant feature of a person’s identity, and no longer ordered by a hierarchical system of worth” (310)

“If Christian interpretation is to embrace the challenge of Paul, it needs to operate, self-consciously, with some form of theological sachkritik—the critical evaluation of Paul’s letters with regard to their central theological subject matter” (316)

“Paul’s letters are arguably best heard not in the study (or the University), but in the complex challenges of everyday community life, especially the life of the church. Often what is challenging to a critically-trained academic is unproblematic for an ‘ordinary’ believer, and vice-versa.” (317)

“since Paul wrote to shape not just minds, but whole lives in their relation to Christ, perhaps the question of this chapter should be differently framed: what in Paul is not challenging today?” (317)

Now, having voiced all these wonderful things about this new CC book, I did have a few concerns. Firstly, because many chapters contain long questions as their title, it made the TOC hard to read “at a glance.” I like the creativity of posing the issues as questions, but on balance I would have opted for easier chapter titles. Secondly, the new edition is different from the old edition in terms of choosing to cluster Pauline letters rather than giving them separate chapters. For example, Romans and Galatians (Oakes) were combined and the essay studied them together. I think the choice here was to save space for other chapters by combining Paul’s letters, but the net effect is that I just didn’t feel like they worked as self-contained treatments. Thirdly, I was expecting that this new edition would introduce some fresh and new voices, perhaps from the majority world. Very little was done with global voices on Paul. What we see here is a somewhat more classic “Cambridge Companion” that is primarily traditional in approach and method. (I did appreciate the inclusion of early reception studies) I did notice that there are more women scholars in this edition than the original, which is a salutary difference.

Overall, I was very pleased with this new companion to Paul. Several essays I will return to, many I will recommend to my students. Bruce Longenecker is warmly commended for a very successful volume!

Notes on New Books

Previous Post

August 2, 2020

New Book: Voices and Views on Paul (Witherington and Myers)

Next Post

August 4, 2020 Editor James Ernest (Eerdmans): The Editors behind the Great Books in New Testament Studies

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz