Moral Transformation in GR Philosophy: Interview with Dr. Max J. Lee

Last updated on: June 13, 2020 at 7:28 am by Nijay Gupta

Moral Transformation in GR Philosophy: Interview with Dr. Max J. Lee 2020-06-13T07:28:36-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My friend Max was kind enough to answer some questions about his important new book Moral Transformation in the Greco-Roman Philosophy of Mind (Mohr Siebeck, 2020).

NKG: How did you become interested in the topic of “moral transformation” in the ancient philosophers?

MJL: How does a person change? Ever since I became a Christian my sophomore year in college at Cal Berkeley, I wondered: If sin has formed me a certain way for 19 years of my life until the day I confessed Jesus as Lord, how does life in Christ reverse this formation and change me into the kind of person God wants me to be? I pondered that question as a young Christian who struggled to live a godly life in college, I pondered it when I joined the staff of Asian Baptist Student Koinonia and started discipling students who shared this struggle, and I ponder it today as an ordained Baptist minister and scholar for the church.

As a seminary student, my search for an answer pushed me to read the letters of Paul. Paul often talks about the transformed life under the Spirit’s agency (Romans 8) and the intense struggle against the gravity of sin which impedes it (Romans 7). How does one move from Romans 7’s cry of despair “Wretched person that I am?” (7:24) to Romans 8’s victory shout that the Spirit of life has freed me from the apocalyptic power of sin and death?

At Fuller Seminary, one of my favorite doctoral seminars was Ralph Martin’s “Greco-Roman Backgrounds.” While reading widely for his seminar, I picked up an unassuming book with a provocative title, Stanley Stowers’ A Rereading of Romans (1997). I was stunned by how Paul’s struggle in Romans 7 had so many linguistic and thematic resonances with ancient philosophical discourse on the passions of the soul. Though not convinced by the overall thesis, I was nevertheless gripped by the parallels between Romans and Platonic-Stoic debates on self-mastery. Add to this my reading of Gerd Thiessen’s Psychological Aspects of Pauline Theology (1987) and a handful of Loeb Classical Library volumes on Epictetus and Plutarch, and I was hooked. What I love about ancient philosophy is that it often asks the same questions that Paul does but in a different way. The sage asks: How does a vicious barbarian transform into a virtuous Roman citizen through philosophical training? Paul puts it this way: How can the sinner transform into the saint through the gospel? Answering the former can provide insight into the latter.

NKG: What is the misunderstanding you want to address or the “gap” you are trying to fill in this book?

MJL: I attempt to do something daring in my book: to map the “moral universe” of Greco-Roman antiquity. Johan Thom in a Festschrift essay for Abraham Malherbe (2003) aptly described the problem and project of trying to find the interconnectedness between diverse moral topoi, or topics of common concern, between various religious and philosophical groups. My book contends that moral transformation is one way to organize diverse topoi into a coherent system of thought, tackling such topics as emotional control, ethical action and habit, character formation, moral progress, training, mentorship, and deity. It develops models to systematize the major tenets of the philosophical schools in Paul’s day, especially Platonism and Stoicism.

The models help the New Testament interpreter guard against the enduring problem of parallelomania. Margaret Mitchell (2001) has this hilarious analogy where she sees debating scholars akin to combatants in opposing trenches lobbing parallel texts like grenades at one another. Each thinks that he or she holds the right external literary source which can unlock the meaning of the biblical text and blow away competing interpretations of Paul. The biblical scholar often takes one topos or topic, say, the Stoic view of friendship and uses it as a foil for comparing Paul’s view of friendship and community. Sometimes a given philosophical topos is ripped away from their wider systems and read out of context or without an appreciation for how the topos fits together as part of a larger process, say, moral transformation. The models of Platonism and Stoicism presented in my book enable the New Testament exegete to place any given moral topos within an entire school of thought. They allow for a wide-angle, panoramic comparison between ancient philosophical systems and Paul’s own system or theology of moral transformation so that overall processes can be compared and not just its constituent parts.

The non-expert will also find my book to be a helpful encyclopedic reference. Rather than reading the book straight through, the selective reader could simply look up the moral topic which he/she is researching. The reader can also discern areas of continuity and innovation between the early classical founders of a philosophical school and their succeeding Greco-Roman adherents. What the Middle Platonists, for example, teach about assimilation to God is not exactly the same as what Plato teaches, and so ignoring the differences between Plato and such Platonists as Alcinous, Plutarch, or Galen could lead to a misattribution of concepts from an earlier era to those of a later one. My book helps avoid this kind of mistake.

NKG: Why should pastors and students of the NT care about conversations in the GR philosophers about the mind and moral progress?

Why care about ancient philosophy and moral progress? At stake is the missional Paul. Paul was a missionary at heart, and I think pastors and students can appreciate how the book takes Paul’s role as an apostle to the Gentiles seriously. If Paul were to communicate the gospel of Jesus Christ with language his recipient audience could understand, he had to engage the religious, philosophical, social, political, and cultural traditions which held the imagination of his Gentile congregations. He had to know how his recent non-Jewish converts were formed by pagan traditions and train them to live a new life in Christ which practiced an alternative set of moral values. In terms they could appreciate, Paul drew from the moral traditions of his day to explain how the Holy Spirit transformed the lives of believers.

Paul was a premiere intercultural communicator who could pastor and disciple his churches. He therefore modeled for his churches how to interact with the ancient pluralism of their day while maintaining Christian distinctives. The exemplum Paul sets in his engagement with the ancient pluralism also holds potential for how the church in our day can engage complex, pluralistic, and diverse ideas in the public arena. I’ve organized the potential ways Paul could have engaged with rival traditions by laying out a taxonomy of six interactions in the final chapter of my book. These interactions include: eclecticism, refutation, competitive appropriation, irenic appropriation, concession, and common ethical usage. What remains is to see how Paul uses any of these interaction types.

NKG: It seems like the book anticipates further work on Paul. Are you going to write a sequel?

The book is foundational for a few sequels, including a volume on Paul. To get a complete synoptic picture of Greco-Roman antiquity, I think it is necessary to include the influence of Epicureanism during this time period and the attempts of Diaspora Jewish exegetes like Philo of Alexandria and the writer of 4 Maccabees to present Judaism as a superior kind of philosophy. So the next sequel, already contracted with Mohr Siebeck and about half-written, is entitled Moral Transformation in Epicureanism and Diaspora Judaism: Toward a Common Ancient Ethical Tradition.

Once this book is complete (possibly 2022), I can focus on Paul. I can envision two or three books on the study of Paul in his philosophical environment. The one I’ll work on first and I’m most excited for has the tentative title: Paul and the Epicureans. It would make the case that the Corinthian wise in Paul’s letters operated from an Epicurean ethics of pleasure.

Right now, I have a spin-off book that runs tangential to the above series. I recently received the Carl F.H. Henry Center Resident Fellowship for a project on the theory of pleasure which integrates theology and science. I will be on sabbatical research leave for the entire academic year of 2020-21 to write a book on how pleasure operates (here’s a link to the project description). It will be stretch for me to tackle the topic of pleasure from an interdisciplinary standpoint. Yet, I’m simply excited that after 15 years of working on Moral Transformation in Greco-Roman Philosophy of Mind, I can focus on a different kind of book and one I think is more directly germane to the mission of the church.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 10, 2020

Colossians and Ephesians: 5 Books Every Pastor Should Read

Next Post

June 14, 2020 Dame Mary Beard on "Whiteness" in Antiquity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz