Paul and the Language of Faith, 4 Big Ideas: #4—Revisiting Paul and Covenantal Nomism

Last updated on: March 11, 2020 at 7:29 am by Nijay Gupta

Paul and the Language of Faith, 4 Big Ideas: #4—Revisiting Paul and Covenantal Nomism 2020-03-11T07:29:10-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

For #1: see “Faith is Something You Do“

For #2: see “Faith Language Points to Covenant”

For #3: see “Surprised by Luther”

Now, #4: “Revisiting Paul and Covenantal Nomism”

After the introductory chapters of my book, I get into some of Paul’s letters and his use of faith language. Perhaps the most important chapter in that section is the one on Galatians. Galatians has been an important text for thinking about Paul’s theology in general, since he was so intent upon clarifying and defending the truth of the gospel.

Galatians has also been a center of focus for debates about the “New Perspective on Paul,” Old Perspective, Paul within Judaism, and the Apocalyptic Paul. One important question that has been asked is, Was Paul a “Covenantal Nomist”? E.P. Sanders had coined this term “Covenantal Nomism” (CN) to describe the “pattern” of common Judaism of Paul’s day. CN conveyed this idea that Jews believed they were included within the covenant relationship by God’s mercy and grace, but they also had to obey Torah to stay within the covenant. Put simply, CN included both divine grace and Torah obligation. Does this work for Paul’s theology? Sanders himself said “no,” but others, like James D.G. Dunn and Morna Hooker, offered a qualified “yes.” If you put the focus on Jesus Christ, and include the transformative presence and work of the Spirit, then “yes” Paul too was a Covenantal Nomist. That is, the pattern of Pauline Christianity included both grace and obligation, because Paul too believed that believers are included into a covenant with God through Jesus Christ. As a bona fide relationship, this Christ covenant must carry expectations for believers, even though God is at work in them to will and to work.

In my Galatians chapter, I seek to affirm Dunn and Hooker (mostly), but I question the language of “Covenantal Nomism.” Nomism implies Law, which makes sense for early Judaism (Torah-centered), but not so much for Paul. As Brian Rosner convincingly argues in his book Paul and the Law, Paul carefully avoids (in Galatians and elsewhere) using language of being “under” the Law. That is, Torah for Paul cannot serve the prime mediation role of connecting God to his people. That must be only Christ (through the Spirit). Torah is not thrown out; it offers much (and necessary) wisdom for God’s people. But it has been displaced as the central platform of the covenant. In that sense, “Covenant Nomism” doesn’t work for Paul. I came up with my own terminology (however inelegant it is): “Covenant Pistism,” which refers to a covenantal faith mediated by and through Jesus Christ alone.

This approach helps to make sense of Galatians 3:23,25 where Paul refers to the coming of “faith” (pistis). Scholars have long wondered why Paul uses this language here. If Paul simply meant the coming of Christ, why didn’t he just say that? But if he meant the coming of human “faith,” that hardly makes sense because he could already point to Abrahamic faith from the distant past. And surely Paul would not put his hopes in a new kind of human “faith”? I take pistis here as a reference to a new way of being in covenant with God, a new kind of relationship, a new kind of “faith,” that is mediated only through knowing Christ by faith, not through Torah. By the time we get to Gal 3:32-25, we have already seen Paul talk about this in 2:20: “The life I now live in the body I live by pistis in the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me.”

I believe Jews before Paul and before Jesus already believed they lived by pistis (hence Hab 2:4). But I think they would have understand this pistis is via Torah. What Paul does that is innovative and even scandalous is not that he talked about pistis—Jews were already comfortable with that term to describe covenant-like relationships. Rather, it was disjoining pistis from Torah and linking pistis only to Christ. Hence, Covenantal Pistism, associating with God through Jesus Christ by pistis, not works of the Law.

Interested in reading more? Check out Paul and the Language of Faith, chapter 8, “Covenantal Pistism: Pistis and the Quest for Paul’s Soteriology.”

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 10, 2020

#50-2-Follow: 50 NT Scholars to Read and Follow—Carla Swafford Works

Next Post

March 11, 2020 In Stone and Story: An Interview with Dr. Bruce W. Longenecker

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz