How I Do Research: David Horrell (Gupta)

Last updated on: March 21, 2016 at 6:00 am by Nijay Gupta

How I Do Research: David Horrell (Gupta) 2016-03-21T06:00:10-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Horrell It is my pleasure to offer this interview with Prof. David Horrell (Exeter), one of the leading NT scholars. Prof. Horrell has written numerous important works including Solidarity and Difference and the recent Becoming Christian. He is currently working on the ICC for 1 Peter – a massive undertaking! So, here is what he had to say about his research practices.

How do you approach research as a whole? Do you have a big-picture strategy? Do your research all at once, and then write? Do you do some sketching and reflecting on paper and then dig into research? Do you go back and forth?

There are two things I am conscious of doing, as part of a deliberate research strategy. One is that I aim to try out new ideas and fresh perspectives in paper presentations and shorter (article) publications in order to discern their significance and value, get feedback and reaction, before I shape a plan for a bigger study such as a monograph. The second is that when exploring a particular topic or writing a certain piece, I do a certain amount of reading and research, enough to ascertain the main contours of the evidence and scholarly discussion, then write an initial draft, which in turn helps me see where I need more detail, further research, etc. I can’t really imagine doing all my research in advance and then writing, partly because, as I discovered during my PhD, I don’t know exactly what I think – or quite where an argument will end up – until I have a go at formulating it in writing. That in turn shows me where I need to do more exploring in order to strengthen and develop the case. I always plan out an essay or paper, usually with a hand-scribbled outline, in order to work out how the various aspects might be arranged in a logical and sequential order and what the overall direction is.

What kind of notes do you take (ideas, quotes, etc.)? How do you organize them?

I take notes on secondary literature both to capture in summary form – and in my own words – what I’ve been reading and also to record specific quotations. I think it’s often important and valuable to summarise a piece in my own words when it’s fresh in my mind, partly because being able to do so is a good sign that I’ve understood and processed it (if I have to resort entirely to quotes, and can’t capture something in my own words, it’s a sign that I haven’t really understood it well.) I used to take more notes onto paper than I do now, when I’m more likely to record them straight into Endnote (see more under the next question!). I confess – slightly guiltily, since it’s not the most eco-friendly practice – that I don’t read well on screen, so I still tend to print out articles and read them on paper, when I scribble, underline, add comments, etc., to highlight what I find important, notable, disagree with etc. Both paper notes and photocopies are then filed away alphabetically under author’s name, in folders that are classified by broad category (NT, Judaism, Social Theory, etc. – and 1 Peter has its own set of folders!).

What kind of tools do you use for researching and collecting information? (software? Do you store notes in Endnote? Dropbox? Evernote? Filing cabinet?)

For initial research I use databases like ATLA, and (less often now than I used to) New Testament Abstracts. Resources and gateways like TLG, lexicons, concordances, Biblia Patristica, etc. are of course fundamental for locating primary sources of relevance. Those are the more systematic ways of attempting to locate relevant information, but to be honest, and I suspect like many others, I also find myself chasing up links from others’ footnotes and references. (Sometimes, in doing so, I discover that the primary or secondary sources don’t actually say what the person citing them says they do, which is one reason why checking out sources and not relying on second-hand information is crucial!) I’ve used some kind of bibliographical database ever since my PhD, when the programme I used was a now forgotten antique called Locoscript PC – anyone remember the Amstrad computers?!… For some time now I’ve been using Endnote. I assign keywords to each item I record on Endnote, beginning with the broadest category (which also determines which physical folder any paper notes will go in – see above) but then specifying other keywords to help me recall items relevant to specific topics – ethnicity, Christology, or whatever.

What have you learned about doing research, collecting notes, and the process of writing throughout your career – put another way, if you could get into a time machine and go back twenty years (or ten years), what advice would you want to give to your younger self about the process of research and how you take notes and read scholarship?

That’s a tricky question – partly because the landscape and resources have shifted so much in the 25 years or so since I began my PhD. I am something of a ‘laggard’ when it comes to new innovations and technologies, so I’m not always quick to get on board with new developments, but things like electronic access to journals, databases like TLG, collections of texts online, and so on, have revolutionised the ways in which research can be done. But I think I would advise my young and naïve former self to spend more time reading primary sources directly, to think about how a project can best be sharply and carefully defined to maximise its contribution to the scholarly discussion, and also to be aware of the extent to which one’s doctoral work establishes a kind of scholarly orientation in one’s work that influences (though does not determine) the direction and style of a person’s work throughout their career – so make decisions about research topics and methods as wisely as possible…! I’ve also come to place increasing value on older scholarship, which often displays an originality and familiarity with the primary sources that much of the glut of recent publication does not – Hort, for example, remains a great source of insight on 1 Peter, and it’s unfortunate he only reached 2.17 in his comments! (I await Lightfoot’s notes on 1 Peter with interest, but he too didn’t reach the end of the letter…)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 16, 2016

Reminder: EP Sanders Book Giveaway (Gupta)

Next Post

March 26, 2016 Video: Mike Bird on "Apocalyptic Paul" (Gupta)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz