Do We Need The New Testament?, Goldingay Asks – Review Part I (Gupta)

Last updated on: June 8, 2015 at 5:48 pm by Nijay Gupta

Do We Need The New Testament?, Goldingay Asks – Review Part I (Gupta) 2015-06-08T17:48:25-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

John Goldingay is one of my favorite OT theologians. So, I had to get my hands on his latest book, Do We Need The New Testament: Letting the Old Testament Speak for Itself (IVP, 2015). I would like to do a two part review of this interesting little book; in the first post, I am going to highlight my favorite parts of this book. In a second post I will delve into my concerns with Goldingay’s book.

Two preliminary items to note before we jump in. Firstly, the title is facetious – of course we need the NT! Goldingay isn’t really worried about needing to defend this. He is just sick of hearing Christians ask, do we need the OT? He wants to turn this around, arguing for the foundational nature of the OT, and how the NT builds on it, but does not replace it. In that sense, a better title for the book (one Goldingay actually notes towards the end), is: What is “new” about the New Testament?

Second preliminary item – this is not a systematic or comprehensive biblical-theological work. It is more of a series of reflections and mini-essays. I might use this as a supplemental textbook for a biblical theology course, but not a primary book. His interaction with scholarship is minimal. OK, now on to the book’s content.

Goldingay is Right!

My first word on this matter is – “Goldingay is Right!” I love this book because I worry that too many Christians play favorites, preferring the New Testament over the Old Testament. To the early Christians, this would be absurd. The New Testament is literally meaningless without the Old Testament. Goldingay writes: “In a sense God did nothing new in Jesus. God was simply taking to its logical and ultimate extreme the activity in which he had been involved throughout the First Testament story” (12). Perhaps the best chapter of the book is the first one where Goldingay debunks all the assumed theories about why the NT is superior to the OT. The New Testament does not conceive of a superior form of salvation (in Old and New it is by God’s grace, within a covenant). The NT does not give a deeper revelation of God. The NT does not have a higher ethic. The NT does not care more for the nations. If this were so, it would be very hard for Christians today to maintain a full commitment, especially ethically, to the OT as Christian Scripture. Yet, sadly, many Christians do that in practice without acknowledging it.

Goldingay’s “big idea” (if the book could be boiled down to just one) is that Jesus does not bring something “new,” but he “embodies” what was taught and hoped for in the Old Testament. One cannot grasp any of this without the OT.

We need the First Testament for an understanding of the story of God’s working out his purpose, for its theology, for its spirituality, for its hope, for its understanding of mission, for its understanding of salvation and for its ethics. (32)

Costly Loss of First Testament Spirituality

Probably my favorite chapter (aside from the introduction) is chapter six on “The Costly Loss of First Testament Spirituality” (Goldingay’s title is adapted from a Brueggemann statement).

When I listen to Christians pray, I hear little evidence of our praying being shaped by [the Psalms]. (103).

In this chapter, Goldingay argues that if we do not patiently learn how to worship from the First Testament, our spiritual lives will be impoverished. This is a powerful, convicting chapter.

Theological Interpretation

Perhaps my next favorite chapter is the last one on trends in theological interpretation, especially reading the Old Testament christo-centrically, by the Rule of Faith, and looking for the Trinity. While it may seem unfashionable, Goldingay challenges each of these trends. He argues, first, that the OT is not about Jesus, it is about God. Lest this offend some (or perhaps it will offend more!), he adds: “Christ is not christocentric” (162).

On Trinity, he writes, “Christian theological interpretation will be trinitarian in the sense that it knows that Yahweh the God of Israel is the God who is Trinity. It will not be trinitarian in the sense that it looks for references to the Trinity in Isaiah or Genesis” (169).

On the Rule of Faith, he urges: “its role is to enable us to see things that are there; it does not determine what is allowed to be there” (173).

In vintage Goldingay-like fashion, he can come across as kind of grumpy in this book, but “grumpy” can be a form of prophetic resistance! Again, I love this book, so make sure you give it a read.

Ahem… the next post will be subtitled: “Goldingay is Wrong!” Stay Tuned.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

June 2, 2015

Great ATS Webinar Recordings for New Faculty and Young Scholars (Gupta)

Next Post

June 9, 2015 Video Resource: Richard B. Hays "Figural Reading" Discussion with Capes, Newman, and Cohick June 2015 (Gupta)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz