Notes on Richard Hays’ Reading Backwards Part 1 (Gupta)

Last updated on: December 2, 2014 at 12:30 pm by Nijay Gupta

Notes on Richard Hays’ Reading Backwards Part 1 (Gupta) 2014-12-02T12:30:06-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was delighted to attend the review session of Richard Hays’ new little book Reading Backwards: Figural Christology and the Fourfold Gospel Witness (Baylor, 2014) at SBL. But I was sad that I had not yet gotten a hold of the book – until yesterday when a nice little package arrived. I was eager to dive right in, so I worked through the preface yesterday. Here are some of my notes.

More to come – this is a kind of “progress report” (~150pp) and a deposit on Hays’ study of the Evangelists’ interpretation of Scripture, and Hays is slowly making headway on a much larger, more comprehensive volume.

“Use”? Hays mentions in the preface that his friend Markus Bockmuehl cautioned him against using the language of “use” when it comes to the Evangelists and Scripture. Did they use the OT? Bockmuehl states:

“It seems both a matter of fact and part of the biblical authors’ intent that their engagement with the Old Testament is at least as much a function of the text’s own agency in terms of its (divine) claim and impact on them, rather than merely of their ‘use’ of it. Could one say that they speak as they do because they are thunderstruck by the pressure that Scripture as a hermeneutical Other exerts on their own view of things? In other words, perhaps what seems to the critic as a device or strategy of manipulation may have seemed to the authors mere faithfulness to the divine word’s strong naming of the fresh reality God had worked in their midst” (p. x-xi, Bockmuehl’s personal words to Hays, cited by Hays).

Wow! This statement from Bockmuehl is almost worth the price of the book in itself! Part of the issue is about the business of reading backwards. Were they only reading backwards? Hays is actually on the same page as Bockmuehl, that there is a dialectical relationship between Scripture and new Christo-centric revelation, but this may be obscured a bit by Hays’ title (“reading backwards”). But note Hays’ appreciative nod at Bockmuehl’s statement: “The aim of these lectures [which became the book] is to listen carefully to their acts of narrative witness-bearing and to discern the ways in which their testimony is the product of a catalytic fusion of Israel’s Scripture and the story of Jesus” (p. xi).

Scripture in context. Hays continues to insist that the NT writers (here the Evangelists) interact with the OT with attention to the wider contexts of the “precursor” texts.

No “Q”. Hays very briefly explains his approach to the Synoptic problem – Markan priority, Matthew and Luke dependent on Mark, but no real need for Q (p. xiv).

Is the Christian re-use of OT texts a rejection of Judaism? Tough question, and Hays received many questions on this in the past. Hays holds hope for meaningful dialogue on this, not “us” vs. “them.”

“It is particularly important to see that the sort of figural interpretation practiced by the canonical Evangelists is not a rejection but a retrospective hermeneutical transformation of Israel’s sacred texts” (xv)

Dialogue partners and influences: Hays briefly pays tribute to these dialogue partners (though he does not agree with all of them): Dodd, Lindars, Dahl, Juel, Hans Frei, Joel Marcus, NT Wright, Hurtado, Bauckham, Boyarin, Kavin Rowe.

Inducted in Early High Christology Club (!)

[Carey Newman] has even hospitably initiated me into membership in the Early High Christology Club, even though in the present book I argue that we should stop talking about ‘high’ and ‘low’ Christologiesin the canonical Gospels (xxi).

I agree with Hays on this, and Simon Gathercole, Wright, Kasemann, and Bonhoeffer all have helped me along on this.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 25, 2014

Richard B Hays is a Class Act - Let Me Tell You Why (Gupta)

Next Post

December 3, 2014 Ralph Martin's Revised WBC 2 Corinthians Commentary (Gupta)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz