Joe Hellerman’s Embracing Shared Ministry

Last updated on: October 22, 2013 at 7:06 pm by Nijay Gupta

Joe Hellerman’s Embracing Shared Ministry 2013-10-22T19:06:28-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently I finished reading Joe Hellerman’s Embracing Shared Ministry: Power and Status in the Early Church and Why It Matters Today (Kregel, 2013). The book of nine chapters is comprised of 3 sections: Power and Authority in the Roman World (chs. 1-3), Power and Authority in the Early Church (chs. 4-6), and Power and Authority in the Church Today (chs. 7-9).

In my view, this book synthesizes and brings together in one place a number of interests Hellerman has regarding Biblical texts, the nature of leadership in the early church, and the proper operation and leadership of ministry in the church today. Three ideas are reinforced in this book: (1) the Christological inversion of the Roman honor-contest, (2) the purposeful choice of Paul to use kinship language for fellow-believers to undercut honor-competition, and (3) the importance of a vision of “shared leadership” in the church today (where there is no solitary figure at “the top,” but, rather, a communion of leaders who share authority as well as the pulpit).

Let me say: the first two sections of the book almost speak for themselves and are well worth the cost of the whole thing. Every pastor who cares to understand Paul and his world should read the first 200 pp. of this book. Put inversely, whoever has not learned the lessons in this book is missing out on the heart of Paul’s theology of cruciform leadership.

I am going to take some time now to walk you through the earlier parts of the book, the chapters that drew me in the most.

In the introduction, Hellerman notes that this book focuses on cruciformity: “The Christian life, at its essence, is a cruciform life. It is a life that is shaped like–and shaped by–the cross of Jesus Christ” (p. 15). In order to see how this works in the NT, we must understand Paul’s Roman world (hence, ch. 1). A main focus of this book is on Philippians, and Hellerman underscores the fact that Philippi was a Roman colony; thus, “the town was Roman in ways that other Pauline church-planting locales were not–especially the colony’s social values” (24). In the Roman world, especially identifiable in a place like Philippi, we see that everything revolved around honor. Hellerman writes,

Christianity was born in a world where honor was everything, and where persons in positions of power…were quick to use their authority publicly to humiliate or abuse their inferiors, if by doing so they thought they could somehow enhance their own status of that of their extended families (p. 30).

The people of Philippi had been socialized for generations to embrace the status-conscious, honor-oriented values of their cultural world. Paul encouraged the Philippians to adopt, instead, the radically alternative servant-oriented approach to human relations exemplified in the attitude and behavior of Jesus of Nazareth (p. 26).

Hellerman explains how the wider population could be categorized as either “elite” or “non-elite” – and the “elite” consisted of only about 2% of the population (some 50 million people). Philippi itself had 500 men of elite (decurion) status in the first century (of c. 20,000 people). In a context where status was the only lasting currency, the Christian emphasis on humility was ridiculous.

Jesus’ challenge to James and John would have struck Mark’s honor-seeking, self-serving Roman readers as utter nonsense–indeed, if put into practice, social suicide. (p. 42).

In the next chapter (2), Hellerman expounds upon the “honors race” in the Roman world. Great charts illustrate the levels of upward mobility. And even if one were not an elite, there were more modest versions of the race in voluntary associations (for example). Even Paul recounts his own Jewish version of the cursus honorum in Phil 3:5-6.

In chapter 4, Hellerman begins to look at how Paul (and other NT writers) work against the honors race.

Paul’s goal was to create a very different kind of community among the followers of Jesus in first-century Philippi. The Philippian church was to be a community that discouraged competition for status and privilege, a place where the honor game was off-limits, in summary, a community in which persons with power and authority used their social capital not to further their own personal or familial agendas but, rather, to serve their brothers and sisters in Christ (106).

How does Paul paint a picture of the divine vision of community? — by narrating the story of the humiliation of Christ (ch. 5) in Philippians 2:6-11. As Hellerman writes, “Such behavior [of self-lowering] would have struck Roman residents of Philippi as abject folly” (140). Another apostolic strategy is employed – the use of kinship (esp siblingship) language – the honor game was “off-limits” for siblings. By calling each other “brother” and “sister,” Christians saw their fellow believers as family members, not sources of honor.

The remainder of the book involves case studies of how places where there was strict top-down authority (with a solitary pastor on top) led to manipulation, unwarranted firing, and mistreatment of lower-rung church works. Hellerman makes a strong case for shared leadership. He offers both theoretical and practical advice.

Evaluation: This is an outstanding book, distilling many years of his research, teaching, and pastoral ministry from a Biblical perspective. Seminary students would do well to heed this advice and embrace the cruciform vision of leadership that he proposes.

I only have a few concerns with this otherwise impeccable study, mostly in the latter chapters. Firstly, while I think much can be gained from his reading of the cruciform nature of Christian leadership, and that shared ministry is important, Hellerman could have explored a number of (other) ways to “apply” the theology of Phil 2:5-11 to leadership challenges today (shared leadership being only one solution). In the several interesting case studies, while Hellerman identified shared leadership as the go-to solution, I think things like “transparency” in leadership process was equally failing (which is not necessarily impossible with a solitary leader) . Also, one could obviously conceive of shared leadership being helpful, but if the communion of leaders become a magisterium, what is to stop them from collectively abusing their power? My point here, perhaps, is that I would have liked Hellerman to have articulated a personal virtue of cruciform leadership (alongside or in addition to a church governance solution).

Finally, while Hellerman’s case studies were appropriate to his argument, only one (out of several) focused on a women leader. Now Hellerman himself ministers in a church with exclusively male pastors, and the academic context in which he teaches largely focuses on male-only pastoral ministry (I presume), so I really can’t blame him for using examples from what he knows and where he has experience. But that means his book has limited reach. If I assign this book for class, I run the risk of giving the 40% female student body a book full of examples of men (save one). Again, I know the audience Hellerman is reaching, and I respect that this is his world. He is frank about that and I am mentioning it because this is the only area where I hesitate to use this book for class.

I am so glad, overall, Hellerman went ahead and wrote a more accessible (and affordable) version of his earlier work Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi. I am grateful to have this book in my library and I expect to appeal to it often. I have long said that his reading of Philippians is compelling and deserves wider attention and appreciation. This book is a handy resource for learning from Hellerman’s outstanding scholarship.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 21, 2013

Festschrift for Beale - From Creation to New Creation

Next Post

October 22, 2013 Did Matthew Try to Replace Mark? - Revisited, the Plot Thickens!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz