On Colossians – Why Another Commentary?

Last updated on: January 8, 2012 at 5:58 pm by Nijay Gupta

On Colossians – Why Another Commentary? 2012-01-08T17:58:09-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

2012 is the year I focus on writing my Colossians commentary (Smyth & Helwys). I have done most of the preliminary research and I have drafted about 30% of the actual chapters. Now, I am beginning a series of blog posts on important issues related to interpreting and applying this Pauline letter. Nothing I write in any of these posts will appear verbatim in the commentary. Consider these posts “extra footage!”

Anyway, in this kick-off post, I wanted to raise the question – does the world need another commentary on Colossians? As I was thinking about whether I should write a commentary on Colossians, the first reaction I had was – could I contribute something that has not already been articulated by Dunn, O’Brien, Barth, Wright, Moo, MacDonald, Martin, Moule, Thompson, Bruce, etc… The brilliant thing about the Smyth & Helwys series is that it is not focused on making a fresh academic contribution to the minute details of historical or linguistic analysis of the text. It is written for students and pastors especially – the goal is a coherent reading of the text that helps such readers make sense of the letter and to find “connections” with life in the modern world. If I felt that I was unsuitable to bring new insights from Greco-Roman backgrounds or discourse analysis, I knew that I could spend time thinking freshly about how to draw out the theology of the text and bring its messages into our time.
In that sense, new commentaries will always be needed, just as new translations will always be needed – perhaps not so many new commentaries and translations, but we can’t throw out the baby with the bath water!
In particular, I felt that Colossians has suffered neglect, as some still designate it a back-seat role in NT theology because of its dubious authorship (an issue I will take up at another time). Also, so many interpreters have strained to discern Paul’s soteriology or Christology in this letter, both noble pursuits, but little investment has been made in drawing out its ethical orientation. As one of my passions is NT ethics (and the theology of Pauline discipleship), I wish to bring some new insight here.
Another reason I love the Smyth & Helwys series is the investment they make in visuals- whether it is maps, charts, photographs (e.g., of cities or artifacts), or fine art – like paintings of or about the textual issue. Such additional features really enhance the interpretation process in so many wonderful ways. Being on the other side of actually choosing these visuals gives me a whole new appreciation for the work put into the production of these volumes.
A final reason why it is worth having another commentary is simply because it is a blessing to me! I am not talking about money (let’s be realistic, if we broke it down by payment per hour, I would be working for, like, 10 cents an hour!). It is about the spiritual blessing of diving so deep into Scripture and spending hours upon hours both privately as well as in the classroom (of church and university) thinking about how to interpret and apply this text. It is profitable for me, so it profits my teaching ministry and all other projects I work on. Thank you S & H editors for this great blessing!
So, does the world need another commentary? Perhaps “need” is too strong a word, or it needs properly defining. If someone were preaching on Colossians and wanted aid, I would quickly and easily recommend O’Brien, Lincoln, Wright, and Witherington (and perhaps one or two others if the inquirer were not overwhelmed!). I would tell them to consult Calvin and Chrysostom for good non-modern insight. I would tell them, after doing their own initial research, to poke into Garland’s very useful NIVAC text on Colossians. So, there are so many wonderful sources. But….I don’t think we have seen the last important word on Colossians. I am not saying my text will set the Pauline world on fire with delight and controversy and push it to the brink of a new horizon of study and insight. But part of the joy of exegesis is new discovery – Daniel Migliore makes a similar point about doing theology –> it is always questioning and, thus, always discovering.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 7, 2012

A Great New Book on Scripture and Suffering

Next Post

January 8, 2012 Blog Tour Starts Today!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz