Review of THE AUDIENCE OF THE GOSPELS (Klink, ed.)

Last updated on: May 14, 2010 at 4:51 pm by Nijay Gupta

Review of THE AUDIENCE OF THE GOSPELS (Klink, ed.) 2010-05-14T16:51:30-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I am currently finishing up a review (for Reviews in Religion and Theology) of the excellent book The Audience of the Gospels: The Origin and Function of the Gospels in Early Christianity (ed. E.W. Klink III). I was a little apprehensive about reviewing this, as I am a “Paul” guy by day, but I want to continue to expand my areas of expertise and work my way into Johannine studies as well. I was very pleased with this book because it is very accessible (esp. the intro and conclusion) and deals with a significant debate in Gospels research at the moment.

This book is meant to give a state of the discussion of the subject of the Gospel audiences. Mainly, it is a reflection on where we are in this field since the publication of Richard Bauckham’s edited volume The Gospels For All Christians (1998) where the viewpoint is challenged that the four Evangelists wrote specifically for their own “communities.” While this book was warmly received by a large number of people (it was a recommended book in my own Gospels courses in seminary), several dissenting voices also rang out (David Sim, Margaret Mitchell, Joel Marcus, Philip Esler, to name a few). Now that we are over a decade later, where have we come?

Klink gives a very nice update of what has been going on in an introductory essay and traces the shape of the debate – though he notes that we are far from a consensus (regardless of Gospel). This essay of Klink’s is a modified version of an article he wrote for Currents in Biblical Research – I recommend that every NT doctoral student read this article or essay of Klink’s as this debate is so very important for understanding how scholarship works and this particular debate has relevance for many other sectors of NT studies.

The remaining essays offer a spectrum of opinions on the views presented originally in The Gospels for All Christians (GAC). Michael Bird generally supports Bauckham and furthermore argues that, while some have countered that the non-canonical Gospels are sectarian, that does not mean that they offer evidence that the canonical Gospels should be read the same. In fact, the sectarian non-canonicals show some proof of being more widely circulated and read, and also, they may be differentiated from the canonicals as the former may have been reactions against the widely-distributed canonicals.

Bauckham himself offers an update and clarification of his position, especially as a rejoinder to the criticisms regarding Patristic evidence set forth by Margaret Mitchell. His use of analogies from Galen are particularly helpful.

Another helpful essay comes from Craig Blomberg who presents a sort of middle approach that considers it possible that (1) the Gospel writers were writing for local communities with local needs, but (2) they would have desired for a wider circulation of the writing. Actually, Bauckham already admits that he finds this consistent with his own approach, as he was simply wanting to argue that the Gospels were written in such a way as not to be hermeneutically dependent on knowing the problems and background of the local community.

Finally, the most critical position comes from Adele Reinhartz, who does not feel that Bauckham’s GAC actually helps Gospels methodology, even if it is correct. She still finds the community-hypotheses to be hermeneutically useful. What she considers to be the long-standing effect of Bauckham’s proposals is a necessary caution in the reconstruction of the community and how the Gospels are mirror-read.

There are a couple of other essays that are worth checking out as well.

REFLECTIONS

1. The more you get into this discussion, the more complex it becomes. It is not a matter of whether Mark or John wrote for a local community or for ‘all Christians.’ There is a spectrum of possibilities in between these: primarily for local people, but also for outsiders; or primarily for all Christians, but with specific messages to the local community. You find that the more nuanced the position becomes, the more complex the process of figuring out what was ‘in the mind’ of the author – something that we know is notoriously difficult to discern.

2. Much of the discussion involves genre – if the general category is bios, how does that help? We have really just moved the same question to this other category – do we really know (for sure) why biographies were written and for whom? Also, how much wiggle room was there? And, we all recognize that the Gospels don’t match this genre-category perfectly. In what way does it change the utility of associating it was a bios when it becomes a Gospel? I personally think that focusing on genre will be a dead-end.

3. It used to be the case that when we taught our students about genre, we said that Paul’s letters and the Gospels should be read very differently. However, the development of these genres are both in a state of chaos. In Gospels, we have some saying that they are sectarian-like and one needs to understand to whom they were written and why (community approach). Others, like Bauckham, push the idea that they must be studied as documents that have a wider purpose beyond the local. For Paul, traditionally, Romans was read as a very general document that outlined his theology. Then, in the second half of the 20th century, there was a focus on how very contingent and local issues are the impetus for the letter. I think the days of easy ‘this or that’ answers are gone. Thus, I think Gospels scholars need to be more attuned to how this discussion has played out in Pauline studies and vice versa with the GAC issue.

4. I think we need to get away from ‘audience’ for this Gospels issue, as it is so difficult to ascertain this issue from the Gospels themselves, and the early-reception evidence is not necessarily crystal clear. Instead, it may be more fruitful to look at the Gospels’ own messages and figure out how much information in a story seems apologetic or corrective. This may help us figure out, not who the work was written to, but why it was written – and I think that is ultimately the big question. For example, in John, we have this repeated concern to explain that John the Baptist is not the Messiah, but a witness to him. That seems to be a very contingent issue, though it may not be a localized issue. Also, the comment about the supposed non-death of the ‘disciple’ in John 21:23 appears to be highly explanatory and instructive for clearing up a misunderstanding.

I don’t think that the GAC debate has been unfruitful. We have learned a lot, especially from Bauckham, about communication in the ancient world, the unity and diversity of the early Christians, and it has renewed interest in old questions like why we have four gospels. Also, it has, especially recently, encouraged us to dust off our copies of the Church Fathers and seek out their wisdom and knowledge.

Again, please order this book for your library and have students engage with it. Both GAC and this new book offer excellent specimens of what it means to think thoroughly and deeply about such issues, but it also shows that amazingly brilliant and respected scholars continue to disagree and interpret the evidence differently.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 11, 2010

New JSNT Issue (June 2010)

Next Post

May 14, 2010 IVP's Ancient Christian Doctrine Series - Part I

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz