Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Crux Sola: Formed by Scripture to Live like Christ

Home
Evangelical
K. Vanhoozer and the Drama-of-Redemption Model of Theology

K. Vanhoozer and the Drama-of-Redemption Model of Theology

Last updated on: October 31, 2009 at 1:23 am by Nijay Gupta

K. Vanhoozer and the Drama-of-Redemption Model of Theology 2009-10-31T01:23:52-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In recent weeks I have reading the excellent Moving Beyond the Bible to Theology book by Zondervan and highlighting the views of each model-contributor – this time around it is Kevin Vanhoozer (following Walt Kaiser and Dan Doriani).

Vanhoozer, unlike the other authors in the first part of this book, is first-and-foremost trained as a theologian- and a darn good one at that, as I can see. The others are primarily Biblical scholars. So, his approach is different. He takes a wider perspective on all these issues, but he never plays fast and loose with ‘proof-texts’. As a hopeful biblical scholar (read here: lifelong student), I hope to see more ‘theologians’ handle biblical texts as carefully as he does in this book.

OK, so Vanhoozer advocates a Drama-of-Redemption model. He begins by urging Christians to see living ‘biblically’ as something different than counting up the commands in the Bible and ‘doing’ them. Rather, ‘living biblically’ is a matter of ‘cognition, affection, and imagination…’ and that it is a ‘community project’ (p. 153).

Vanhoozer (hereon “V”) explains that we may be doing it wrong to take the Bible as if it were a rulebook for ethics. Rather, V prefers the analogy of a drama – a “theodrama.”

The sacred page [i.e. Scripture] exists to direct our attention to the divine play….Theology is merely the shadow cast by the theodrama; God’s doing–God’s speech and action– is prior to the church’s response. The gospel that assembles the church is a divine comedy in which followers of Jesus Christ have a privilege and responsibility to take part (p. 156).

Here is V’s definition of the DoR approach which

affirms God’s actions in history, preserves the emphasis on story, and incorporates a canonically attuned, wisdom-oriented “chastened” principlizing, while better integrating the interpreters into the action…[U]nderstanding is a matter not only of cognition but of action. (159).

Believers all, in any and every generation, are called to perform their part in the drama. Here are V’s guiding questions for eager actors.

1. Where are we in the theodrama? What kind of scene are we playing?

2. Who are we? In what kind of plot are our lives entangled?

3. What time is it? What act and scene of the drama of redemption are we playing?

4. What is happening? What is God doing?

5. What we say or do?

(see pp. 162-3).

You will notice, and V makes it no secret, that he is influenced by NT Wright’s interest in narrative,

So, how does the drama work? For V, Scripture does not offer the script to the drama; rather, ‘we perform…the world/theodrama that the text/script presupposes, entails, and implies’ (p. 166).

As I gather, V means that you do not read the Bible to know what to do, but how the world works, how God has worked in the world, and how we can realize his hope for the renewal of the world (my words, not his). V says, biblical interpretation involves ‘renewing and transforming people’s habits of seeing, thinking, and acting…[Scripture] is…a medium of divine communicative action whose purpose is not only to inform but to transform: to nurture right vision, right attitudes, right action.’ (p. 171).

How to act out the theodrama takes, what V calls, “canon sense,” what is ‘right and meet’ with Scripture. He calls this: ‘fittingness.’

Here are his principles for fittingness.

1. Determine who is speaking and how what they are doing with their words relates to the main idea and action of the whole triune drama.

2. Know who, when, and where you are in the drama.

3. Put on the canonical spectacles of faith in order to see, judge, and act in the spectacle of faith now playing in a world theater near you.

Vanhoozer has more to say. Much more, so I will leave you to it. But this is a teaser. He is so articulate and poetic – his words have real power because he is a master communicator. However, I fear that those of us with very empirical historical-critical training will read this chapter and scratch our heads: huh?

Here is Walt Kaiser’s response:

After reading and rereading Kevin’s chapter many times over, for the life of me I cannot explain to anyone else, much less myself, how the “drama-of-redemption approach” works or really solves any of the crucial questions being put to the Bible in our day.

Again, while Vanhoozer offered a very rich essay on what the Bible is, his answer to those wondering about doing ethics and theology in light of the Bible is very complex. Do we look for a simple method that makes sense, but can seem overly simplistic and can lead to multiple conclusions (such as Kaiser’s principlizing method); or do we try a more theological dense method that is very hard to grasp, takes a lot of explaining, and will only finally be accessible to a few bright theologians? I must say that Vanhoozer’s chapter received, so far, the least criticism. But was that because the other contributors liked it or didn’t quite get it and weren’t as honest as Kaiser in saying it out loud (or on paper)?

Ok, maybe it was just Walt and me. I will reread Vanhoozer, and I would be tempted to say that he is probably closest to the most accurate answer. I think that there must be a better way to make what he says obviously right. Well, more to come on following chapters.

Again – I can’t emphasize this enough – this is one of the most important books I have ever read on how Christian use and interact with their Bibles. Also, the contributors were chosen very carefully and all have made excellent points. Clealry a lot of work went into this book, from beginning to end, and it is worth it. A must-read and one that you will not able to put down.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 30, 2009

new Expository Times (SAGE)

Next Post

November 6, 2009 Translating the New Testament (book notice)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz