Interview with Peter Head on Ancient Letter-Carriers

Last updated on: August 7, 2009 at 9:00 pm by Nijay Gupta

Interview with Peter Head on Ancient Letter-Carriers 2009-08-07T21:00:21-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today I have the pleasure of sharing with you an interview I conducted with Dr. Peter Head who is the Sir Kirby Laing Senior Lecturer in New Testament (Tyndale House, Cambridge). One of his current areas of research regards ancient letter-carriers. He runs a blog on this subject: see HERE. He has also done some publishing on this topic bit by bit (see bibliography on his blog). I am particularly interested in Paul and what his letter carriers did (i.e. did they help to interpret the letter?), so that led me to bring his work to the attention of all of you. So, without further ado, thanks Pete and best wishes on your ongoing research – we eagerly anticipate the next bit of wisdom from your pen (or printer?)!

From my understanding, you are in the midst of a large project on letter-carriers in the ancient world and their function in the process of the communication, performance, and/or interpretation of the letter. How did you develop an interest in this topic?

Firstly, you are right and the project has a focus on Paul within a very broad context (since I see him as functioning in a very broad context). My interest in the question of the role of the letter-carrier in Paul’s communication strategy came about as I was mulling over in my mind four or five areas that I was thinking about or teaching on. In my Cambridge teaching I had done Greek exegesis classes on Colossians and Romans – two letters written to churches not founded by Paul, without the initial basis for communication in shared experiences like his other letters, and with very strong introductions/recommendations of people traditionally understood to have been the letter carrier (Phoebe in Rom 16 and Tychichus in Col 4). So the question as to how Paul thought these letters would be received (and how they may actually have been received) was connected in my mind with the prominence of the presumed letter carrier. It struck me that all the other letters would have been received (and interpreted) within the framework of a pre-existing appreciation (if not total commitment) to a broader understanding of Pauline theology. Perhaps the letter carrier enabled this in the case of Colossians and Romans (although to be fair there is evidence that both these churches also have a pre-understanding of Pauline theology).

Anyway, these ideas were percolating in my mind while I was also asked to teach a summer school course at Tyndale House in Papyrology and the Greek NT (http://www.tyndalehouse.com/SummerSchool/index.htm). In a short course we introduced a range of issues but the underlying unity of the course and practically all of the set texts were letters. Here I was struck both by how the letters of recommendation actually worked, but also by other letters which use (in parallel with Paul) recommendatory language in connection with the letter carrier (often actually specified unlike Paul); and by some notable examples of letters where the letter carrier has an important role (P. Oxy 3313 which I discuss in my JSNT paper was crucial in this).

In your research on the topic so far, what kinds of things surprised you? What kinds of evidence and findings were you not expecting?

I’m not sure that I have had a lot of surprises. I guess it is sometimes surprising that scholars can make firm pronouncements on the basis of at best anecdotal evidence. I’ve still got a fair way to go with the research, but although there is an overall theory in my mind, I am trying not to expect the evidence to confirm my theories.

I have noticed that you are doing a lot of your own translation of papyri and other primary material. Have poor English translations been a serious problem for your research?

I don’t think poor ETs have been a problem, but I obviously wanted to construct a project which would need work on Greek, Hebrew and Latin texts. And ETs (if available) are a good start for reading letters, although as with the NT, slowing yourself down to read the Greek can help all sorts of issues emerge more clearly.

Have you had to do much traveling for your research?

No. Not for scholarly materials. I am in a triply fortunate position. Firstly I have an office above the library at Tyndale House – which has a fantastic library for NT studies generally and a very co-operative librarian. Secondly within a couple of hundred metres is the University Library with over seven million books (not to mention even closer is the Classics Faculty Library which is also excellent and has a nice quiet back room for palaeography and papyrology). Thirdly, papyrology has particularly excellent and important web sites, e.g. the Heidelberger Gesamtverzeichnis: http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/~gv0/gvz.html; APIS: info here: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/projects/digital/apis/news.html, and others (try Tresmigestos for a portal: http://www.trismegistos.org/).

I am wondering whether and to what extent re-tracing the journeys of the Pauline letter-carriers would be useful. I have a feeling that it could be interesting, perhaps at the level of imagination more than anything. As a prelude to that I have a half-baked plan to mountain bike around the delivery route of 1 Peter during my next sabbatical.

How did you decide which texts to inspect?

Well I am still deciding that question. The basic answer is: anything that is relevant to the question, with special attention to actual letters. The broad parameters are by date (200 – 200) [although I am prepared to take in earlier and later evidence on particular points], and in three/four categories: documentary letters; elite/literary letters; royal/ambassadorial letters (the fourth category is/was ‘jewish letters’, but I am not sure about this as a separate category).

I know that E.R. Richards has also written about letter-carriers. How does your current work compare and contrast to his?

Yes, Randy has written an excellent book in many respects (Paul and First-Century Letter Writing: Secretaries, Composition and Collection) which is written in a relatively popular and confessionally Christian style (which certainly annoyed one RBL reviewer who could apparently not believe that anybody intelligent enough to write the first fourteen chapters could possibly add a fifteenth which discusses the doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture in relation to the composition of Paul’s letters – http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/4550_4629.pdf). (I don’t know whether Christian readers were also shocked that an evangelical scholar would actually attempt to integrate his academic research with his doctrine of Scripture.) I see this book as a very welcome contribution to the field, based on original research and building on his earlier important monograph on Secretaries in the Letters of Paul (he also wrote an interesting paper on 1 Peter). “Compare and contrast” – well he has written two books on the subject and I have not; he has addressed a whole range of issues – including especially the role of secretaries and his theories, which owe something to Earle Ellis, about the composition of the letters and the use of pre-formed traditional material (which I do not follow) – whereas my focus is ostensibly more narrow; and I think in relation to the letter carriers he asks some crucial questions: to what extent did they bring additional information? Did they function as apostolic envoys or representatives? Were they involved in the rhetorical performance of a letter? Did Paul’s practice change over time or with new circumstances? How did the whole process of co-authors, secretaries/scribes and couriers inter-relate? These are all important questions. I suppose I wouldn’t be writing on this subject if I didn’t think I could make some additional contributions (obviously not all NT scholars think like this), but it would be premature to declare them all now, especially as a lot of the really important thinking has only just begun.

What will be some of the implications of your study for NT research more broadly? (This is the ‘so what’ factor!)

Well I hope I will have gathered together a lot of material that other people will be able to use and think about. I hope that my treatment of various Pauline letters and particular passages will be interesting and persuasive. The theory that the earliest reception of specific Pauline letters would have been accompanied by a Pauline representative who could relate the specifics of the letter to the general Pauline tradition known to him (or her), offers important historical legitimation for informing contemporary interpretation of the Pauline letters and draws the historical study of the reception of Paul’s letters into closer proximity and dialogue with canonical methods of interpretation (stylistic analysis suggests that this sentence incorporates an earlier tradition). There are also issues that arise in relation to Paul’s understanding of his apostolic ministry; his relations with his co-workers, the use of the OT in Paul, the role of women in the Pauline circle, the authenticity of some of the Pauline letters etc. It connects with broader questions about the nature of Scripture and the relationship between Scripture and tradition, so there is no shortage of general interest!

Uncategorized

letter-carriers

Peter M Head

Previous Post

August 7, 2009

Monograph Series Interviews - Open Invitation to Readers

Next Post

August 11, 2009 Interview with D. Gurtner re: SNTSMS (Cambridge)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz