The Two Kinds of Commentaries….

Last updated on: March 5, 2009 at 10:48 am by Nijay Gupta

The Two Kinds of Commentaries…. 2009-03-05T10:48:38-08:00 Nijay Gupta

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I, like many other NT researchers, have spent much time (and perhaps too much time) in commentaries. I own probably 200 of them. Some are great, many are mediocre, and some are almost worthless. I have noticed that there are two kinds of commentaries (and perhaps more). There are commentaries that comment and there are commentaries that construct.

The first kind of commentary is, perhaps, the traditional kind – verse-by-verse, the author looks at exegetical issues and gives notes on background, possible meaning, textual issues, history of interpretation. These commentaries tend to be bitty and disjointed. They are best used as reference resources for a quick check when dealing with a self-enclosed issue. You often learn from comparisons to other ancient texts. These commentaries are necessary, though they tend to be mind-numbingly boring.

The second kind of commentary attempts to find big-picture issues – narratively, theologically, ideologically, thematically – that can help to understand the text as a whole. The author hypothesizes how the text should be read and goes on to ‘read’ in that manner throughout the commentary. These commentaries tend to be gripping and even entertaining. The challenge is that exegetical problems are either hastily domesticated to fit into the theological or literary scheme, or simply ignored.

In the first kind of commentary, you may compare it to someone who is trying to restore an old dusty paining. She dusts it off and tries to shine light on it in the right way that brings the viewer as closely as possible to the original way the art piece was viewed. She does not dare to alter or touch the art lest the original be marred. Her ability to restore the painting is limited, due to the natural problem of age. She does the best she can using modern means, and is content to allow some spots to remain faded, dark, smeared, or even missing.

The second kind of commentary approaches the painting differently. While restoration is worthwhile and this person will dust off the painting. He is not content to stop there. He wishes to draw in the attention of on-lookers who would not come closer because the painting looked old, frail, and frankly not worth the effort. He endeavors to pull out his pallette and retrace faded lines. He is not trying to add anything to the picture. There are no new objects, shapes or people. He is trying to restore by bringing out what is already there. The challenge is, he does not have the exact same colors as the original artist. He must choose an approximation – sometimes it can be nearly identicial, sometimes it is just close. Sometimes he must fill in broken lines. Does this second artist become a co-creator of the work? It has certainly attracted the attention of many on-lookers who step closer and chatter about the details.

I make no argument that one is better than the other. It does bring to light how various commentaries ‘interact’ with the material and the implicit attitudes about the text and purposes of the ‘comments’.

Any thoughts?

Uncategorized

commentaries

Previous Post

March 4, 2009

March - May releases from Eerdmans

Next Post

March 5, 2009 UPDATE: The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category (Mis)Understanding Philippians 10 Things I Can't Live Without 2023 New Books 30 OT HB Scholars to Read and Follow 5 Books Series 50-2-Follow Academia Christian Theologians to Read and Follow Cruciform Scripture: Contributor Reflections Crux Sola TV Editors Behind Great Books in NT Studies Education Gendering the Holy Spirit Gupta FB Live Lectures In Faith and Doubt In Their Own Words Living the King Jesus Gospel My Top 6 OT Commentaries New Testament Resource Guide New Word Biblical Themes Nijay's A Very Library Christmas Shopping Guide Notes from an Editor Notes on New Books NTRG OT in the NT Paul Seminary Now The Bible in God's World The Word Felt Among Us SPENCER Translating Philippians Uncategorized Why I Use Accordance Women in Ministry

Select a Month March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 May 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz