{"id":152,"date":"2024-04-10T12:56:06","date_gmt":"2024-04-10T19:56:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/?p=152"},"modified":"2024-06-05T13:07:41","modified_gmt":"2024-06-05T20:07:41","slug":"is-old-art-better-than-new-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Photo by Lo\u00efc Manegarium<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As both an actor and an author, I have spent many years in both the film and literary communities, discussing and debating what the \u201cgreatest\u201d movies and books are. And while I always enjoy these artistically oriented talks, I confess I feel a bit sheepish when it comes time to declare my actual favorite movies or books. And I\u2019m not alone \u2014 I\u2019ve had many hushed conversations, away from the cliques, where friends have confided in me their <\/span>actual <\/span><\/i>favorite works, their \u201cguilty pleasure\u201d that they dare not say above a whisper, lest they be considered dumb, or worse, uncultured. There\u2019s a social pressure to ignore many of the works that have touched, entertained, and moved us most, in favor of saying the predetermined and socially acceptable favorites \u2014 most of which fall under the definition of \u201cold,\u201d which is very often synonymous with \u201cbest.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general. In looking at the curated lists like <\/span>The Guardian<\/span><\/i>\u2019s <\/span>\u201cThe 100 Greatest Novels of All Time\u201d<\/span><\/a> and the famous American Film Institute\u2019s <\/span>\u201cThe 100 Greatest American Films of All Time,\u201d<\/span><\/a> we quickly see they are made up almost entirely of works multiple decades or even centuries old. This makes sense for the most part \u2014 these great works have had time to be read or watched and loved by countless people, establishing themselves firmly in the cultural fabric and standing the test of time. But the question remains: Does having lasted the longest and been most popular actually make them the best? And even if they are, should they be?<\/span><\/p>\n

I\u2019ve begun to wonder if perhaps our philosophy about appreciating antiquated artistic expressions over modern ones could be negatively affecting our society\u2019s ability to not only enjoy but even create great works of art, both now and in the future. Appreciating art from times past is a valuable practice, but only insofar as it doesn\u2019t pressure people into liking things they don\u2019t or discourage artists from creating things that could be even better.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

What\u2019s New Becomes Old<\/b><\/h3>\n \ This idea of \u201cold is best\u201d is, ironically, not a new phenomenon. The picture of stuffy art critics saying, \u201cWell, it wasn\u2019t [fill in the blank]\u201d is as old as art itself. During his lifetime, Charles Dickens, who is now widely considered to be one of the greatest novelists in history, was often criticized\u2013 his work being considered by many critics to be mere pop page-turners that didn\u2019t live up to the writers that came before him. The same is true for many of the artists who created work we now consider to be the best. Take the painter Van Gogh, who, during his lifetime as an artist, sold only one painting. It\u2019s hard not to imagine just how many people walked by, taking little notice of the masterpieces we now hang in the greatest museums in the world. They say that tragedy plus time creates comedy \u2014 well, apparently, art plus time creates quality.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ It would seem that humans, especially art critics, have a bias against the new and different, opting instead to stay within the comfort of well-worn paths and the safety of walls built by other people\u2019s opinions. The reality is, some of the greatest art this world will ever see, the art that will one day be considered among the greats, is currently being ignored and dismissed.<\/span><\/p>\n \ Old Doesn\u2019t Mean Better<\/b><\/h3>\n \ I have read many classic books and watched most of the classic movies. Many times, I can see why they are considered the \u201cgreatest,\u201d but I have also often been surprised at their very apparent mediocrity, especially compared to the demonstrably better contemporary counterparts that are dismissed.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ In 2012, Christopher Nolan\u2019s film <\/span>The Dark Knight<\/span><\/i> was released into the world. I was living in Hollywood and working as an actor. I had big dreams of being in meaningful and beautiful movies that were entertaining, artistic, and thought-provoking. And when I saw <\/span>The Dark Knight<\/span><\/i>, I was given an embodiment of that desire and a hope that they could still be made. Not long ago, I found myself in a conversation with fellow artists about the best movies ever made. After the required items such as <\/span>2001: A Space Odyssey<\/span><\/i> and <\/span>Citizen Kane<\/span><\/i> had been named, I chimed in with <\/span>The Dark Knight.<\/span><\/i> I was met with eye rolls and scoffs.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ There is a social pressure to repeat the same old list of artistic creations. This list is perpetuated not so much by the actual opinion of most individuals, but instead the insecurity that if one deviates from this list, they will be <\/span>uncool<\/span><\/i>. But this method doesn\u2019t actually help us identify what art is actually good. It simply pressures us into pretending that old art is better because there\u2019s social safety in numbers and art that has a track record of other people liking it for a long time.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ Art Of Its Time<\/b><\/h3>\n \ One of the things we most often forget when it comes to appreciating old art in the modern day is that when it was written, filmed, or created, it wasn\u2019t old. The classic authors, artists, filmmakers, poets, and musicians from yesteryear created art with stories, subjects, and styles relevant to their particular time in history. Great art isn\u2019t created in a vacuum. Great art comes from artists who reactively articulate their experience and perspective within their own time and context. The great American poet and playwright Langston Hughes\u2019 work is powerful because in it he detailed both the beauty of his community and as well as the difficulties of facing racism in the early 20th century. The great 16th-century Italian artist Caravaggio was famous for taking ancient bible stories and depicting the characters in them in modern attire and settings that existed in his culture and time. Jane Austen became one of the greatest-selling authors of all time from telling stories about the kinds of people in the kinds of situations that existed all around her in the early 19th century.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ Great artists help us understand, articulate, and process the very specific time, culture, and situations we find ourselves in, right here in the modern (current) day. Without them to do this necessary work, we as a culture will be lost. So ignoring new art in favor of the old is to our own detriment and betrays a mental abandonment and escapism from having to engage with the world outside our door.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ An Artistic Future With A Hope<\/b><\/h3>\n \ Idolizing the old and ostracizing the new doesn\u2019t just affect the viewers of art, but also the creators of it. The mental health of any individual or society is almost entirely dependent upon a future with potential good and hope. So if we hold to this belief that the greatest books have already been written, and the greatest films have been made, what hope or impetus does that give aspiring artists of today to try and create something great, when they\u2019re told no matter what they make, it\u2019ll never live up to what\u2019s already been done?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ So many of the conversations around the \u201cclassics\u201d or the \u201cgreats\u201d don\u2019t serve as education for young artists to better their craft, but rather as a deterrence from them even trying. And if we\u2019re not careful, we will create a self-fulfilling prophecy that keeps great(er) art from being made altogether. Imagine telling Dickens to not write <\/span>A Tale of Two Cities<\/span><\/i> because Shakespeare had already written <\/span>A Midsummer Night\u2019s Dream<\/span><\/i> \u2014 or telling Shakespeare to not bother writing <\/span>Hamlet<\/span><\/i>, as Chaucer had already written <\/span>The Canterbury Tales<\/span><\/i>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \ In the ancient Psalms when describing how we ought to worship God, the psalmist says <\/span>\u201cOh, sing to the LORD a new song! Sing to the LORD, all the earth.\u201d <\/span><\/i>implying there\u2019s something of eternal value in creating new and original things. I don\u2019t want to live in a world where I am pressured to believe that all the best art has already been made. That\u2019s depressing and leaves no hope for possibility, for both art lovers or creators. I want to live in a world where we use old art as a base to build upon and as an inspiration to rise even higher than we have. I want to live in a world with the hope that the best art is yet to come. To borrow an old line from a classic book, \u201cFurther up and further in!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \ \u00a0 As both an actor and an author, I have spent many years in both the film and literary communities, discussing and debating what the \u201cgreatest\u201d movies and books are. And while I always enjoy these artistically oriented talks, I confess I feel a bit sheepish when it comes time to declare my actual favorite […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5543,"featured_media":161,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[53,11,56,35,14,50],"class_list":["post-152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-ancient","tag-art","tag-critic","tag-film","tag-music","tag-old"],"yoast_head":"\nIs Old Art Better Than New Art?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cross Cultural\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nathanclarkson\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-04-10T19:56:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-05T20:07:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/2231\/2024\/04\/IMG_8862-1-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nathan Clarkson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nathan Clarkson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/\",\"name\":\"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-04-10T19:56:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-06-05T20:07:41+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/59ecde009ec5b089a4fedd5c9a97af88\"},\"description\":\"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/\",\"name\":\"Cross Cultural\",\"description\":\"Exploring the intersection of faith and art and discovering what religion has to do with movies, music, books, video games, and more...\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/59ecde009ec5b089a4fedd5c9a97af88\",\"name\":\"Nathan Clarkson\",\"description\":\"Nathan Clarkson is an award-winning television and film actor who's appeared in numerous network shows and blockbuster movies. A Publishers Weekly bestselling author of multiple books, including Finding God in Hollywood. A hit-indie filmmaker whose original films have been seen by millions trending on Netflix. And an iTunes Top 100 podcast philosopher on the multi award-winning show, The Overthinkers. Nathan has been featured in Variety, The LA Times, Relevant Magazine, Religion Unplugged, The Collision, NBC's The Today Show. Nathan lives between the streets of New York City and the lights of Los Angeles.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/nathanclarkson.squarespace.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nathanclarkson\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/nathanjclarkson\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/author\/nclarkson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?","description":"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?","og_description":"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/","og_site_name":"Cross Cultural","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nathanclarkson","article_published_time":"2024-04-10T19:56:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-05T20:07:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/2231\/2024\/04\/IMG_8862-1-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nathan Clarkson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nathan Clarkson","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/","name":"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2024-04-10T19:56:06+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-05T20:07:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/59ecde009ec5b089a4fedd5c9a97af88"},"description":"There\u2019s long been an attitude, particularly within literary and film circles, that older is always better when it comes to literature, films, and art in general.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/2024\/04\/is-old-art-better-than-new-art\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is Old Art Better Than New Art?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/","name":"Cross Cultural","description":"Exploring the intersection of faith and art and discovering what religion has to do with movies, music, books, video games, and more...","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/59ecde009ec5b089a4fedd5c9a97af88","name":"Nathan Clarkson","description":"Nathan Clarkson is an award-winning television and film actor who's appeared in numerous network shows and blockbuster movies. A Publishers Weekly bestselling author of multiple books, including Finding God in Hollywood. A hit-indie filmmaker whose original films have been seen by millions trending on Netflix. And an iTunes Top 100 podcast philosopher on the multi award-winning show, The Overthinkers. Nathan has been featured in Variety, The LA Times, Relevant Magazine, Religion Unplugged, The Collision, NBC's The Today Show. Nathan lives between the streets of New York City and the lights of Los Angeles.","sameAs":["https:\/\/nathanclarkson.squarespace.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Nathanclarkson","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/nathanjclarkson\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/author\/nclarkson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5543"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/161"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/crossandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}