Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Jean-Luc Marion: Does Silencing Love Mean Philosophy is a Misnomer?

Jean-Luc Marion: Does Silencing Love Mean Philosophy is a Misnomer?

Last updated on: February 5, 2015 at 7:18 pm by Artur Rosman

Jean-Luc Marion: Does Silencing Love Mean Philosophy is a Misnomer? 2015-02-05T19:18:05-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The risque of love in philosophy? The cover of this book by Catholic philosopher Jean-Luc Marion is not for Puritan prudes.

Here is the cover in its full glory. It’s nothing more than what you’d see in a Renaissance or Baroque church.

The everyday ramifications of reading are a constant preoccupation of mine. I like to believe that the books I read change me for the better. Granted, given the starting point, improvement shouldn’t be much to write home about. Even so, I put my faith in philosophy as a way of life.

If philosophy is to be a way of life, then it has to live up to its name. The name, as you’ve no doubt heard countless times, philosophy means “the love of wisdom,” or something like that. But where’s the love?

Is love more complex than an orderly Greek temple?

I love Jean-Luc Marion for asking the same question in his book on love, The Erotic Phenomenon. He feels betrayed:

Philosophy today no longer says anything about love, or at best very little. And this silence is for the better, because when philosophy does venture to speak of love it mistreats and or betrays it. One would almost doubt whether philosophers experience love, if one didn’t instead guess that they fear saying anything about it. And for good reason, for they know, better than anyone, that we no longer have the words to speak of it, nor the concepts to think about it, nor the strength to celebrate it.

Further on in the introduction to The Erotic Phenomenon Marion makes the point of not making a hard and fast choice between human (eros) and divine (agape) love as the Protestant Denis de Rougemont did (following the Lutheran Anders Nygren in Agape and Eros) in his classic Love in the Western World. With this move Marion seems to follow de Rougemont’s most strident critic, Fr. D’Arcy, who wrote in his The Mind and Heart of Love:

It’s not as brown and British as the cover makes it look. Great book.

The perfection of love . . . is to be found in personal friendship, whether between a man and a woman, between man and man or between man and God. When God revealed himself as love, the last fear was removed from man’s heart . . . Neither God nor nature, nor other human beings were enemies and a menace. They could all be looked at with interest and love, and in the case of persons love could be mutual. Even Eros, if it knows its own nature, can go with Agape.

How is that for a fine Rabelaisian mess?

Where’s the love in your philosophical reading? I’m curious about book recommendations, especially recent books. I’m wondering what I’m missing if love is barely visible, or even invisible, in contemporary philosophy.

Here’s Marion on the ultimate expression of love as I await your responses:

See the post What Does Love Know? for more on Marion’s philosophy of love.

Praying to a French God and the post on Derrida, Phenomenology, and Theology place Marion in his proper French context.

Finally, there is also a post that puts phenomenology in its original Eastern European and Social Philosophy Context.

Love in the Western World

martin d'arcy

philosophy

the erotic phenomenon

Previous Post

February 4, 2015

Last Temptation of Christ & American Christian Responses to ISIS

Next Post

February 6, 2015 Did Darwin Kill God? Conor Cunningham and Benedict XVI Answer

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Though he slay me, yet will I hope in him"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Job David Isaiah