Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Who Needs ISIS When Western Intellectuals Advocate Killing Newborns?

Who Needs ISIS When Western Intellectuals Advocate Killing Newborns?

Last updated on: February 19, 2016 at 3:48 pm by Artur Rosman

Who Needs ISIS When Western Intellectuals Advocate Killing Newborns? 2016-02-19T15:48:59-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Did you know that for the longest time the pro-life cause was first a progressive issue?

The odd thing about the Oxbridge ethicists is that they later admitted they made their arguments in favor for infanticide as a playful continuation of an academic game, rather than as something meant to have real weight and costs:

We started from the definition of person introduced by Michael Tooley in 1975 and we tried to draw the logical conclusions deriving from this premise. It was meant to be a pure exercise of logic: if X, then Y. We expected that other bioethicists would challenge either the premise or the logical pattern we followed, because this is what happens in academic debates. And we believed we were going to read interesting responses to the argument, as we already read a few on this topic in religious websites.

However, we never meant to suggest that after-birth abortion should become legal. This was not made clear enough in the paper. Laws are not just about rational ethical arguments, because there are many practical, emotional, social aspects that are relevant in policy making (such as respecting the plurality of ethical views, people’s emotional reactions etc). But we are not policy makers, we are philosophers, and we deal with concepts, not with legal policy.

Philosophy does not make things happen for them (but philosophers such as Peter Singer, Michael Tooley, and the writers included in the anthology Infanticide and the Value of Life). Just think of how different this is from the conception of philosophy as a way of life. The earlier and more authentic conception of a costly transformation helped to shape early Christianity in such a way that its ascetic practices, such as the ones especially encouraged during Lent, were absorbed so thoroughly that we suppose they were providentially there from the beginning.

In turn, without their development in the theological tradition there would be no human rights tradition and no source for opposing entities like ISIS, but more importantly, barbaric practices such as abortion, which kill as many millions yearly in just the United States alone, far more than the endless wars we’ve been fighting for over 20 years. France just went into what might become permanent martial law in order to protect its citizens against ISIS, but its abortion laws remain on the books as if they were sacred. Doesn’t support for the latter mock the purposes of the former?

Lent teaches us that the real enemy is, against our desires to escape culpability by scapegoating, within rather than without. If I may pervert Augustine, who first conceptualized Original Sin anyway, the mystery of iniquity is closer to us than ourselves.

I’m surprised I ended up with a weird Lent reflection from where I started. I suspect this is further proof all of these life-issues–economics, healthcare, the environment, and terrorism–are, like every cell in our body, somehow connected. These claims for philosophers extend out chronologically forward and backward. If we accept their thin account of personhood, then there is no reason why someone shouldn’t advocate for the legal killing, making Just War, on the vast majority of NFL fans whose loss would make no appreciable difference in value accrued to society as a whole. They are only human beings in potentia going by the infanticide-ethicist criteria. On the other hand, if we want to avoid that sacrificial bloodbath, then we have to extend personhood to the unborn as the philosophical-theological tradition has done for most of its existence.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

See also: No Theology, No Phenomenology of the Person? (an interview with Thomas Pfau) and Abortion is Not a Conservative Issue.

Please consider making a donation to this blog through the donation button on its homepage.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Stay in touch! Like Cosmos the in Lost on Facebook:

Cosmos the in Lost

Previous Post

February 13, 2016

Does Pope Francis's Joint Declaration with Patriarch Kirill Throw Eastern Catholics Under the Bus?

Next Post

February 18, 2016 Pope Francis Questions Whether Trump is a Viable Candidate for Catholic Voters

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What African country is known for its ancient Coptic Christian Church?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ghana Nigeria South Africa Egypt