Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Pope Francis Gets Boost from Leading Cultural Marxist Publisher!

Pope Francis Gets Boost from Leading Cultural Marxist Publisher!

Last updated on: August 12, 2015 at 1:28 pm by Artur Rosman

Pope Francis Gets Boost from Leading Cultural Marxist Publisher! 2015-08-12T13:28:00-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Virilio is a Catholic, and he takes his Catholicism seriously enough to praise John Paul II in Verso’s Books, as here in his classic Open Sky:

With cybersexuality, you no longer divorce, you disintegrate. Proprioceptive reality suddenly becomes improper; it is all done with reciprocal distancing. . . .

. . . Thanks to the force-feedback control glove (DataGlove) and, especially, to the DataSuit, everything is ruled by lightning, and the coup de foudre of disunited lovers suddenly becomes a coup de grace. From erotic entertainment we then move on to sexual diversion and shortly to a fatal divergence – that of the reactor that set off nuclear fission.

It’s a very thin line between ecstasy and distaste for, in future, it is at the speed of electromagnetic radiation that cybernetic orgasm will occur.

In effect, if distancing brings (interactive) lovers together to the point where they manage to love those far-off as they do themselves, the gap between the wedding and the divorce will have been closed off once and for all.

By way of a provisional conclusion, let us review the early ethical reactions to this telematic mutation in sexuality. In an apostolic letter published in 1994, in honour of the International Year of the Family, Pope John Paul II declared: ‘Union and procreation cannot be artificially separated without altering the intimate truth of the conjugal act itself.’

Far from chiming in as a simple rejection of contraception or the usual repetition of the indissoluble nature of the bonds of marriage, this statement points to another major question: the question of the nature of the separating artefact. What artificial construct are we in fact talking about when even bodily union is eclipsed by a virtual telesexuality that advocates the separation of bodies and no longer just divorce?

What happens not only in the future of holy matrimony, but also to divorce, when they are not literally dissolving, not the couple, but copulation?

Now that’s one helluva question! I’ve talked about it in relation to the spread of asexuality in late modern capitalist societies, especially in Japan.

Verso Books sells out to Catholicism again.

These three examples from Verso publications, and I could keep multiplying them, are part of an interesting trend. The secular academe is not as secular as the Culture Warrior Cassandras deeply believe. In fact, they believe so deeply in the power of the nonexistent “Cultural Marxism” that they de facto believe it to be more POWERFUL than God. Their lack of faith in God does not square with my experience, especially since I reverted back to Catholicism at the afore mentioned purportedly secular state university.

I would argue that against the expectations of Cultural Warriors who are welded to narratives of decline Catholicism is leading the conversation on fundamental issues after Laudato Si’. The reversal from not too long ago is quite stunning. Whereas in the 60’s and 70’s Catholicism struggled to keep up with a triumphant Marxist critique, and it had some success (as in Johann Baptist Metz’s trenchant critiques of rotten bourgeois Christianity), now it is Marxism (on permanent decline) that’s getting back to its Christian roots (See: Kolakowski’s massive and exhaustive account in The Main Currents of Marxism).

Just imagine, when Encyclical on Climate Change and Inequality: On Care for Our Common Home makes its way into the state university curriculi, as I’m convinced it will, then students from non-religious backgrounds will be asking: “What is its religious stuff and how does it connection with the bits on the economy and climate change?”

The tables are turning.

Imagine there’s no Cultural Marxists . . .

For a wider range of unusual, but distinctively Catholic reactions see the following:

1) Kevin Hughes on St. Bonaventure and crack in the encyclical (LS)

2) Keith Michael Estrada on why capitalists should be nervous about LS

3) Michael Martin on LS and the ancient biblical tradition of sophiology

As always, drop a coin in my my hat through the PayPal button here.

Previous Post

August 11, 2015

Dave Griffith: The Violent Bare It Away and Away and Away

Next Post

August 13, 2015 Threatening Naturalism's Universal Authority

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What are the names of the two witnesses in Revelation who prophesy for 1,260 days?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They are not named Peter and Paul Moses and Elijah Enoch and Elijah