God Provides the Justification: Jean-François Garneau on #WhyRemainCatholic

Last updated on: July 2, 2015 at 1:09 am by Artur Rosman

God Provides the Justification: Jean-François Garneau on #WhyRemainCatholic 2015-07-02T01:09:36-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The questions were reawakened in an explicit form during a ‘retreat’ I did at a Benedictine monastery, in the Eastern Townships of Quebec –a visit that my high school had organized for its senior students. It is there that I picked up a Chesterton biography of St Francis of Assisi and became hooked on his sort of poetic insights and, I now realize, facile rhetorical questions and dialectics with which G.K. Chesterton dealt with the modern world. His (and later C.S. Lewis’) way of asking religious questions are to blame for the way my obsessions were reawakened in ‘philosophical’ form. There was also two other authors, but they are so likely to be unknown in the English speaking world that I mention them only for the sake of completeness, not thinking they will mean anything to an English speaking person: André Manaranche, a French Jesuit, and Claude Tresmontant, the author of pseudo-scientific apologetic works.

I say the questions were reawakened towards the end of my teenage years, but in fact the anxiety linked to my line of questioning had never stopped bothering me, at the less articulated, emotional level. One of the shapes the questions took concerned death. Not death in the abstract, but in the very concrete form of holes dug up for tombs and the charnel house in the cemetery besides the house where my Cub Scout group met. Or, death as in going to practice my piano, in the main parlor of the nuns’ convent where I went to school, never knowing if there would, or would not, be a tomb in the parlor when I arrived (for this was where the viewing of deceased nuns’ corpses occurred, whenever a member of the community died). These were rather concrete ways to remind me that we all die, which forced me to modify my original question from why are you doing liturgy to why are you all going through life as if death is not inevitable? Far from providing me with answers as to the purpose of liturgy, it made me suspect (long before I read Freud) that this was all the expression of some vast unavoidable neurosis, co-terminal with the human condition when one was honest enough to face the truth of existence.

These questions, and the hope of finding an answer to them in the sort of terms outlined by Chesterton, Lewis, Manaranche and Tresmontant never really left me until just a few years ago. And as I said: I really wished that those questions would have left me alone for I could always sensed how neurotic they were.

Three things happened that made me change my ways.

The first one was the reading of Albert Camus as a meditation on Plato’s allegory of the cave, which made me think of conversion in a totally different way than the one to which so many in the born-again crowd reduce it to. Instead of viewing conversion as an event that occurs in the outside world, as a result of realizing we’re sinners and giving ourselves up to the Lord in some ‘religious’ sort of 12-step program, I started to see conversion as a change of viewpoint within one’s way of apprehending the world. Instead of viewing my sense of the absurd as an indictment of the possibility for any meaningfulness in the world, I started to view it instead as a sign of the existence of some transcendent reality of meaningfulness, the sort that just was not entirely coextensive with the world and which manifested itself in the world either as something lacking (in the form of what made us feel the world was meaningless) or as something present but which could not be reduced to the world’s materiality (the world’s beauty, for instance, whose very material fleetingness made it otherworldly).

The second thing that made me change my way was the reading of Jung and Jung-versed theologians. Jung has a way of telling you that just because it’s happening in your head that doesn’t mean that it’s not real calmed my obsession with finding empirical foundations for whatever faith I had, and to learn to trust that faith instead of questioning it. I stopped viewing my instincts as neurotic and started using my faith less like a question raising issue and more like a guide (Cardinal Newman’s Lead Kindly Light expressed this sentiment very well, for me). This, in turn, led me to pay more careful notice to all the Christian and non-Christian traditions that speak of the inner teacher (Augustine, Socrates) or of the ‘imitatio mariae’ so we can become, in our turn, Theotokos, by letting the word of God take roots in us and work its theogenic magic in us (Eckhart).

Go back Continue Reading

Jean-François Garneau

religious imagination

Previous Post

June 30, 2015

Holly Taylor Coolman on Remaining a Catholic

Next Post

July 2, 2015 Is Christianity Secularization's Best Hope?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Genesis figure "walked with God and was no more, for God took him"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lamech Enoch Seth Abraham