Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Theological Beliefs Might Be Natural, BUT Are They Rational?

Theological Beliefs Might Be Natural, BUT Are They Rational?

Last updated on: March 20, 2015 at 2:47 pm by Artur Rosman

Theological Beliefs Might Be Natural, BUT Are They Rational? 2015-03-20T14:47:58-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Could this be a breakthrough book?

I have this nasty little habit of reading several books simultaneously. The variety of my reading experiences spices things up by helping me make connections between several texts.

Right now I’m reading Gadamer’s Truth and Method, Levering’s The Theology of Augustine, and Mosebach’s novel What Was Before. After starting a blog series on atheism with the pieces Those Christians Who Think there is an Atheist Worldview Deserve a Tinfoil Hat and John Gray: Waiting for an Atheist Morality is Like Waiting for Godot I added A Natural History of Natural Theology by De Cruz and De Smedt to the list yesterday.

Gadamer’s book is one of the most important critiques of modernity according to Thomas Pfau.

We’ll see how the connections with this book play themselves out, but I suspect the comparison with Truth and Method will be most fruitful. Gadamer’s book is built around a defense of humanistic knowledge in its concern with unique phenomena against method with its tendency to downplay the unique in its search of lawlike patterns.

What’s interesting about A Natural History of Natural Theology is that it takes a humanistic area of experience, religious experience, and submits it to rigorous methodical analysis. Such a procedure does not need to be necessarily reductionist as I’ve noted in my overview of Oliver Davies’ argument that neuroscience, genetics, and evolutionary biology put us on the threshold of a Second Scientific Revolution. He believes these new disciplines overcome the dualism of the First Scientific Revolution, therefore, they are much more amenable to an incarnational religion like Christianity.

I found reading this book very transformative. It opens many new horizons.

The unnaturality of religion is something the New Atheists (read: #NotAllAtheists) like to harp on. There is the ever entertaining Richard Dawkins who tantalizingly argues that forcing religion upon your children is tantamount to child abuse. I don’t think anybody really loses much sleep over such bald assertions, but then it does make one wonder whether one has to force religion upon kids at all. For example, my own son came up with a whole odd theology of his soul’s preexistence in heaven before he was born. He ain’t heard that from me.

De Cruz and De Smedt note how naturally fairly sophisticated arguments from cosmology, morality, design, and beauty come to nonspecialists across religious traditions (They also add the negative argument from as evil as one such natural phenomenon). They confess their argument is not all that original since you can see something like it already in St. Paul [and I might add in Wisdom]:

Through the grandeur and beauty of the creatures, we may, by analogy, contemplate their Author (Wisdom 13:5).

Ever since God created the world, His everlasting power and deity–however invisible–have been there for the mind to see in the things He has made (Romans 1:20).

Given my full reading table this is merely a preliminary peek at this book. The following passage stands out:

In recent years, cognitive scientists have begun to investigate the psychological underpinnings of religious beliefs. Using evidence from fields like anthropology, developmental psychology, and neuroscience, they have convincingly argued that religion relies on normal human cognitive faculties. Religious beliefs arise early and spontaneously in development, without explicit instruction.

This new book from MIT Press seems to ask all the right questions.

Note the last two words in that passage.

Furthermore:

They exhibit cross-cultural similarities such as afterlife beliefs and a belief in supernatural agents. Such beliefs are examined in terms of ordinary cognitive biases and constraints. Philosophers are exploring the implications of this research for the justification of religious beliefs. Can the rationality of religious beliefs be maintained in light of the fact that they are the result of these cognitive processes?

I’m most interested in the last question they ask in the passage above: Does the naturalness of religious beliefs negate their rationality? (I would add that only modernity would think of nature as being in conflict with rationality.)

We’ll see.

It might turn out that Richard Dawkins is the one peddling superstition:

Look at my TOP10 list on religion and science for all the latest developments in this dialogue. See also: My posts on Oliver Davies here and here.

Philosophy

Science & Religion

a natural history of natural theology

childhood development

Previous Post

March 19, 2015

Those Christians Who Think there is an Atheist Worldview Deserve a Tinfoil Hat

Next Post

March 23, 2015 Deneen, MacIntyre, Schindler, Dreher? For John Zmirak I'm Ahead of Them All!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Genesis" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Law Origin or beginning History Wisdom