Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Hermann, Max, Woody and Falling Out of the Ordo Amoris

Hermann, Max, Woody and Falling Out of the Ordo Amoris

Last updated on: January 11, 2015 at 7:41 pm by Artur Rosman

Hermann, Max, Woody and Falling Out of the Ordo Amoris 2015-01-11T19:41:49-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday we discussed Woody Allen as a liminal personality stuck somewhere between belief and disbelief. Being lukewarm is acceptable to most, even if it’s a bit hard on God’s stomach, but when one makes a jump into either committed belief or unbelief (from its opposite), then one becomes an outcast. There is nothing more frightening than the person who has betrayed a community to that community; bridges burn automatically behind them.

Being haunted by both belief and non-belief, a certain brand of late modern lukewarmness, is something that James K.A. Smith rightly presents as Charles Taylor’s definition of what it means to live in A Secular Age. A secular age, as Taylor understands it, is not synonymous with progress into unbelief, or the expunging of belief from the public square, because both trends have shown themselves to be easily reversible. Instead, a secular age is unique because of something else. Smith deftly summarizes this something else in his brief summary of Taylor’s book-brick in How (Not) To Be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor:

Ours is a “secular age,” according to Taylor, not because of any index of religious participation (or lack thereof), but because of these sorts of manifestations of contested meaning [this comes after an extended discussion of Julian Barnes’ Nothing to Be Frightened Of and Elie’s The Life You Save May Be Your Own: An American Pilgrimage]. It’s as if the cathedrals are still standing, but their footings have been eroded. Conversely, the Nietzschean dream is alive and well, and the heirs of Bertrand Russell and Auguste Comte continue to beat their drums, and yet Oprah and Elizabeth Gilbert still make it to the best seller lists and the magic of Tolkien still captivates wide audiences. Even a late modern hero like Steve Jobs doesn’t conform to the [original] narrative of secularism [as the total eradication of religion].

The greatest Catholic, modernist, Austrian, and theological novel you know nothing about.

In other words, the age is secular because the non-believers doubt their doubts. I would argue that what Taylor and Smith mean by “secularism” is much more frequently associated with the epistemological fluidity–for both believers and non-believers–of postmodernity. But too many books have been published with the word “postmodern” in the title, I guess.

This is a disturbing situation for all concerned. Woody Allen might have great theological insights, even though he might be, or might not be (nobody knows fully!), a bit of a dirtbag. On the other hand, there is also the example of Max Scheler, who was one of the most brilliant early phenomenologists. His thought lies at the foundation of the personalist and distributist currents that have floated Catholic theology since at least the middle of the last century. Scheler was a convert to Catholicism whose prose and personality drew people in to both phenomenology and the Church in droves. Just get a whiff of the following passage from his famous essay on the order of love, “Ordo Amoris” [from his Selected Philosophical Essays] and you can see why:

I find myself in an immeasurably vast world of sensible and spiritual objects which set my heart and passions in constant motion. I know that the objects I can recognize through perception and thought, as well as all that I will, choose, do, perform, and accomplish, depend on the play of this movement in my heart. It follows that any sort of rightness or falseness and perversity in my life and activity are determined by whether there is an objectively correct order of these stirrings of my love and hate, my inclination and disinclination, my many sided interest in the things of this world. It depends further on whether I can impress this ordo amoris on my inner moral tenor.

The cover design decisions on this Northwestern series devoted to phenomenology are as confusing and questionable as some of the decisions Max Scheler made.

The play of this movement on Scheler’s heart fell to his womanizing perversities and he fell out of the Church toward the end of his relatively short life. The same fate befell Hermann Broch, another big convert to Catholicism, who penned what might be called the greatest Catholic novel, Sleepwalkers, that you know nothing about. I wonder whether such unfaithfulness in human relationships is also what makes Woody Allen waver so much in his faithfulness to atheism.

I think our period, with the breakdown of purely abstract philosophical and theological systems, has only come to highlight the necessary harmony between theory and practice for both believers and non-believers. Such a harmony is at the root of the Philokalia‘s teaching. It is something that I’ve discussed elsewhere under the heading of philosophy as a way of life.

The fact that Max Scheler was not able to impress the ordo amoris upon his moral inner tenor does not negate his philosophical and existential insight. On the contrary, the tragedy of his life only proves its reality for him and the rest of us.

It might also suggest that drastic conversions or reversions (always betrayals to some community) grow out of the small lukewarm betrayals that accumulate. I’m haunted by this thought as I finish typing this at around three in the morning when I know I have to take our eldest to preschool in five hours from now. Pray that I get up in time.

Previous Post

September 16, 2014

Woody Allen Considers Conversion

Next Post

September 18, 2014 Ruined by Books: My TOP10 Novel List

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote many of the Psalms?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Peter Solomon Paul