Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
The Eclipse of Science During Those Terrible Middle Ages

The Eclipse of Science During Those Terrible Middle Ages

Last updated on: April 15, 2015 at 11:43 am by Artur Rosman

The Eclipse of Science During Those Terrible Middle Ages 2015-04-15T11:43:16-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The University of Washington Suzzallo Library‘s facade tells a medieval Catholic story.

You might think the debunking of the Bruno, Galileo (Never tortured, spent three days in prison, if any), and Hypatia myths still doesn’t touch the so-called eclipse of science during those terrible Middle Ages.

You’d be wrong, of course.

One of the most pernicious Reformation and Enlightenment myths we persistently cling to is the erroneous belief that the middle ages impeded the advancement toward modern science.

Giordano Bruno: Brought to you by the same intellectual tradition as the horoscope.This historical lie was (of course, duh, what else did you expect?) perpetuated by the first episode of Cosmos.

We were told that Bruno was a significant breakthrough from the crudeness and ignorance of the so-called Dark Ages–even if it’s not clear to the show’s makers if he was a martyr for science, or really a martyr for anything.

Thanks to Bruno, we are told, a new light magically dawned upon the Western world thanks to his rediscovery of the ancients and their commitment to nature.

If it sounds too simple, it is.

In truth Karsten Harries recounts in his Infinity and Perspective how Bruno was a hermetic [quack] whose theories were not derived from direct observation, but from books of hermetic magic.

Bruno also subscribed to millenarian apocalyptic beliefs that have much more in common with those who believe in the Rapture (and Swedenborg) than with scientists and orthodox theologians. People like Bruno harbored fanatical hopes for a cosmic revolution in 1600 because of the magical significance of the numbers nine and seven. No, I’m not kidding.

Do science popularizers like deGrasse Tyson really want to position themselves in such company? Are they trying to tell us something? If it’s all about the imagination escaping the thought police, then why are science educators going after creationists who build museums that feature humans and dinos side by side?

According to Elspeth Whitney in Medieval Science and Technology, if we want to look for the dawning of a new spirit of scientific inquiry then we should look about six hundred years earlier than Bruno:

All that you didn’t know about the Middle Ages can be found here.

“Between 1000-1300, Europe changed from an intellectual backwater to one of the most intellectually innovative cultures of the world. This process happened in several stages. From about the year 1000, there are numerous signs that medieval thinkers developed a new and original appreciation of nature. In the words of one important historian [Marie-Dominique Chenu, OP], 12th and 13th century thinkers ‘thought of themselves as confronting an external present, intelligible, and active reality as they might confront a partner.’

This new attitude had wide repercussions:

The personification of nature as a forceful and imperious goddess appeared everywhere in literature, detailed and accurate relief sculptures of local plants appeared on church exteriors, and ‘the natural’ became a new touchstone for what was considered normal and appropriate behavior. This new awareness of nature was supported by an increasingly dynamic economy, greater social mobility, and new political and religious institutions.

The notion of an eclipse of science during the middle ages is terribly misguided.

The intellectual institutions she has in mind are universities, funded by the Church, even though theology was actually one of the least studied topics in them.

Their results are indisputable. These results put the elitist philosophical schools of Greece and Rome (institutions of the 1% if there are any) to shame. In the chapter on the supposed medieval repression of science in Galileo Goes to Jail we read:

Between 1150 and 1500, more literate Europeans had had access to scientific materials than any of their predecessors in earlier cultures, thanks largely to the emergence, rapid growth, and naturalistic arts curricula of the medieval universities. if the medieval church had intended to suppress the inquiry into nature, it must have been completely powerless, for it utterly failed to reach its goal.

When you take all of this into consideration then there may be some piety and awareness of origins in making a major state university library resemble a medieval cathedral and not including Bruno among the statues on the facade?

Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey

Science & Religion

Bruno

Cosmos spacetime odyssey

Karsten Harries

Regine Pernoud

Those Terrible Middle Ages

Previous Post

March 19, 2014

Walker Percy on the College Dorm Arguments of Sagan and deGrasse Tyson

Next Post

March 25, 2014 Squishy New Atheist Pieties Miss Gospel Love's Ruthless Demands

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many people did Jesus raise from the dead?

Select your answer to see how you score.

2 4 5 3