Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Cosmos The In Lost

Home
Catholic
Hitchcock Didn’t Have a Deathbed Conversion (Famous Atheists Who Weren’t Atheists #5)

Hitchcock Didn’t Have a Deathbed Conversion (Famous Atheists Who Weren’t Atheists #5)

Last updated on: January 9, 2016 at 8:14 pm by Artur Rosman

Hitchcock Didn’t Have a Deathbed Conversion (Famous Atheists Who Weren’t Atheists #5) 2016-01-09T20:14:16-07:00 Artur Rosman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yet another deathbed conversion? I think I’m going to throw up! (PD-Fair use)

I almost went to see Hitchcock’s Vertigo in glorious 70mm last week. I admit I don’t know how watching it in that format would differ from watching it on DVD either.

Now that I have that off my chest, did you read the heartwarming story of Hitchcock’s deathbed conversion in the Wall Street Journal last year? You must have. Admit it, you rejoiced with the angels at return of one of the lost sheep.

Mark Henninger, SJ’s piece, “Alfred Hitchcock’s Surprise Ending,” where this is mentioned, is a response to Hitchcock biographer Donald Spoto, author of *Dark Side of Genius (*Who apparently is a fool who says “There is no God” in his heart):

“One of Hitchcock’s biographers, Donald Spoto, has written that Hitchcock let it be known that he ‘rejected suggestions that he allow a priest . . . to come for a visit, or celebrate a quiet, informal ritual at the house for his comfort.’ That in the movie director’s final days he deliberately and successfully led outsiders to believe precisely the opposite of what happened is pure Hitchcock.”

Dark Side of Genius: There’s nothing darker than tricking both your biographer and your priest.

It turns out Hitchcock didn’t only allow a priest in to comfort him during his last days. Worse, he allowed two priests. Even worse, they were Jesuits!

Thus we find Henninger defending a tradition that Constantine first made famous:

“Some people find these late-in-life turns to religion suspect, a sign of weakness or of one’s ‘losing it.’ But nothing focuses the mind as much as death. There is a long tradition going back to ancient times of memento mori, remember death. Why? I suspect that in facing death one may at last see soberly, whether clearly or not, truths missed for years, what is finally worth one’s attention.”

However, there’s one little problem!

Hitchcock never stopped being a Catholic. You see, in order to have a deathbed conversion (technically a reversion in his case) you either have to be a non-believer, or you have to cease practicing at some point in your life.

[Click here for all the other posts in the Famous Atheists Who Weren’t Atheists series.]

Neither is the case with the director of I Confess. Peter Chattaway has this to say about him in his piece “A Cranky Catholic“:

“Nevertheless, Hitchcock was a practicing Catholic for most of his life. His wife Alma, a film editor, converted to Catholicism before their marriage in 1926, and they worked and lived together until his death in 1980. They attended Mass weekly, and they quietly made several generous donations to Catholic churches and charities. In 1952, their daughter Patricia married the grandnephew of the late Cardinal William O’Connell, who had been a powerful archbishop in Boston.”

OOOPS!

Boom-chicka-bow-wow; Truffaut Making Hitchcock look Catholic.

It appears Hitchcock also outwitted his Jesuit confessor. Which brings me to his famous book-length interview with the French film-director Truffaut. Truffaut does not hold back in pushing elements of Catholic theology onto Hitchcock. The director of Vertigo is reticent, pushes back a bit, yet still talks of himself in terms of “We Catholics.” This is what makes Hitchcock/Truffaut such a compelling read.

Which brings me to Deleuze, who in his Cinema 1 says, “There is, however, no need to make Hitchcock a Platonic and Catholic metaphysician.” But why is there such an urgent need to suppress it? Why are there no substantial theological readings of the films of the I Confess director? There is, however, a chapter about him in the book Afterimage: The Indelible Catholic Imagination of Six American Directors (Scorsese, Hitchcock, Capra, Ford, Coppola, De Palma).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbecuIiqtjg

Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists

Previous Post

September 16, 2013

Yet Another Way the Vatican Blows the Competition Away

Next Post

September 24, 2013 You Don't Know (Steven) Dick?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category #WhyRemainCatholic Abortion Advent Anti-Catholicism Arts Atheism Beauty Benedict XVI Bible Book Review Catholic Cinema Comedy Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey Czesław Miłosz Dariusz Karłowicz Devil Easter Eastern Orthodoxy Economics Environment Family Famous Atheists Who Weren't Atheists Guest Post Hans Urs von Balthasar HHS Mandate History Imagination Interview Islam Jean-Luc Marion John Paul II Judaism Just War Lent Literature Little Sisters of the Poor Liturgy Martyrdom Music News Paganism Patristics Phenomenology Philosophy Pierre Hadot Poetry Poland Pop Culture Pope Francis Poverty Prayer Protestantism Rabelais Race Remi Brague Rene Girard Russia Sam Rocha Science & Religion SCOTUS Secularization Sexual Abuse Sexuality Silence Solidarity Stratford Caldecott Synod14 Terrorism Top 10 Uncategorized Walker Percy War Weakened Edition World War II World Youth Day WYD Krakow

Select a Month July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which river did Naaman wash in to be healed of leprosy?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jordan River Arnon River Nile River Euphrates River