Constitutional Philosophy for Regular Citizens, Part IV: The Immorality of Long-Term National Debt

Last updated on: July 11, 2018 at 11:15 pm by Michael Farris

Constitutional Philosophy for Regular Citizens, Part IV: The Immorality of Long-Term National Debt 2018-07-11T23:15:16-05:00 Michael Farris

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The following is Part IV of COS Project co-founder Michael Farris’s series on constitutional philosophy. Click here for Part I, here for Part II, and here for Part III.

Thomas Jefferson wrote a lengthy letter to James Madison urging a rule against long term national debt.

He said: “would it not be wise and just for that nation to declare in the constitution they are forming that neither the legislature, nor the nation itself can validly contract more debt, than they may pay within their own age, or within the term of 19 years?”

Currently, there is no plan to actually retire any of our nation’s debt. We simply keep borrowing. So long as we can pay the interest on the continually mounting debt, our leaders seem content to keep spending like there’s no tomorrow.

The average age in Congress is 57 years old. They have no personal stake in the debt payments required 50 years from now. Those who are 1-17 years old today, have an enormous stake in the debts left in place 50 years from now.

But they can’t vote today and so those in Congress continue to buy votes with deficit spending being sure to load up the spending with things like free prescription drugs for seniors.

The Seniors don’t have to pay for the drugs. Congress doesn’t have to pay either. It just borrows the money. No one pays—today. But our grandchildren and great grandchildren for years to come will be paying for our “free drugs” Congress gave us.

Our grandchildren will be taxed for things they did not vote for. They will be taxed for things they didn’t use.

This is the ultimate taxation without representation.

That’s immoral and, I believe, unconstitutional.

The Constitution demands that Congress guarantees a Republican form of government. Taxation without representation is the singular most well known violation of this principle because of the prominence of this phrase during the American Revolution.

Paying off the existing debt is hard but not impossible. But it is impossible if we don’t stop spending on credit.

Congress benefits from this arrangement by buying votes without present pain of imposing current taxes sufficient to pay for all the spending. Lenders benefit because holding long term debt from the richest country on earth makes sense. My generation benefits because we get free stuff from Congress.

And until a sufficient number of Americans rise up and call this for what it is—stealing from the pockets of our grandchildren—it will continue.

We need to know the truth. Act on the truth. And spread the truth.

If the current generation wants stuff—we should pay for it today.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 11, 2018

Constitutional Philosophy for the Regular Citizen, Part III: Congress Can't Delegate Its Powers

Next Post

July 11, 2018 Constitutional Philosophy for Regular Citizens, Part II: Government vs. Family

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 1 Timothy, what must an overseer be?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A miracle worker Above reproach, faithful to his wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable Wealthy and generous Ordained by the apostles