Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Convention of States

Thirty Years Ago, Milton Friedman Spoke Out about How to Fix a Corrupt Congress – His Solutions Would Work Today

Last updated on: June 21, 2018 at 8:41 am   by Convention of States

Thirty Years Ago, Milton Friedman Spoke Out about How to Fix a Corrupt Congress – His Solutions Would Work Today 2018-06-21T08:41:42-05:00 Convention of States

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Milton Friedman has been described as “the grandmaster of free-market economic theory in the postwar era and a prime force in the movement of nations toward less government and greater reliance on individual responsibility.” In 1980, Milton and his economist wife Rose created a landmark international television series: Free To Choose, and the best selling book that evolved from it. Many Americans watched as Milton explained the “interrelationship of personal, political and economic freedom in ways that everyone could understand.” The Nobel laureate was one of the 20th century’s leading economic scholars, so what did he think about a Convention of States?

He supported it.  Thirty years ago, he endorsed an Article V Convention of States because he knew changing personnel cannot solve the structural damage to our systems of government.

In one speech, he said, “Every individual in his private life has a budget to spend. If he considers whether to spend more on one thing, he has to ask himself, ‘Where’s it going to come from, and where am I going to cut?’ But our legislators don’t have that kind of a budget limit. They can vote to spend more. And they will say, ‘Where will it come from?’ ‘Oh, somewhere. The taxpayer will pay for it.’ I think myself there is fundamentally only one way in which you can remedy it. And that is by a political change in the form of constitutional provisions which will set a limit to government spending,” he said.

“What we need is to give our legislators a budget. To say ‘This much, and no more!’ Because now somebody come to them and says, ‘You’ve got to vote more money for this good cause or that good cause.’ And they will say, ‘I agree with you, that’s a good cause! Where shall I cut? I have a total budget. We can’t vote more unless we vote less for something else. What shall we vote less for?’ Then the special interests can fight with one another, instead of the special interests ganging up on you and me.”

Exactly.  And if this was true thirty years ago, it is even truer today.

“That is the only hope we have for stopping the growth of government, for holding it back. We must not kid ourselves into thinking that we’re going to remedy it by the easy way of electing the right people to office. That will not work. Once they get into office, they are going to be subject to the same pressures and the same drives as the people we might regard as the wrong people. In fact I have often said that the right solution is not to elect the right people to office, but to make it politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing. Because unless it’s politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing, the right people won’t do it either.

“And I should think by this time we have had ample experience to demonstrate the validity of that proposition. We must look at the thing as a whole and go to the fundamental source of our problems.”

His solution to this was a Convention of States, since it would effectively bypass the Washington bureaucracy.

Watch his speech here:

In his obituary, the New York Times described his view of government:

In Mr. Friedman’s view, government had the opposite obligation: to keep its hands off the economy, to let the free market do its work. He was a spiritual heir to Adam Smith, the 18th-century founder of the science of economics and proponent of laissez-faire: that government governs best which governs least.

Let’s let his words affect us even now.

Uncategorized

Milton Friedman

Previous Post



June 21, 2018

Report: Obama silenced and ignored impartial watchdogs for years

Next Post



June 21, 2018 Your House Would be Massively Cheaper Without So Much Government Regulation


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "I do not know how to speak; I am too young"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Moses Samuel Jeremiah

Related posts from Convention of States

Politics Red

Daniel Horowitz Sounds Off on Incompetent Congress

Convention of States

Politics Red

WASTE: Earmarks Jump Nearly 50% Between 2017 and...

Convention of States

Politics Red

New to the Convention of States? Check Out...

Convention of States

Politics Red

Huckabee on Levin: Convention of States is Necessary...

Convention of States

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...

How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...

For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise

For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...

Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD

The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...

From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...

I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube