Convention for Proposing Amendments Not as Scary as Big Government Advocates Suggest

Last updated on: April 4, 2018 at 10:28 am by Convention of States

Convention for Proposing Amendments Not as Scary as Big Government Advocates Suggest 2018-04-04T10:28:58-05:00 Convention of States

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The following excerpt was written by Rob Natelson and originally published on The Hill.

We are witnessing a renewal and quickening of a 50-year old campaign to dissuade Americans from calling a convention for proposing constitutional amendments.

Like voter suppression efforts, the campaign uses fear and disinformation to discourage citizens from exercising an important constitutional right.

Article V of the Constitution permits the American people, through our state legislatures, to require Congress to call a “convention for proposing amendments.” As the name suggests, this is a way of proposing constitutional reforms Congress refuses to propose. Any proposals must, however, be ratified by 38 states before they become law.

Our founders designed this as a way the people could fix the federal government if it became abusive or dysfunctional. The convention is, in fact, an important constitutional check, like the president’s veto or the Senate’s right to vote on treaties. Today many favor a convention to propose federal term limits, a balanced budget rule, campaign finance reform, a single subject rule for congressional bills, or combinations of these and other changes.

Popular interest in a convention grows when people are dissatisfied with the federal government — as they are now. Unfortunately, this is also the signal for opponents to re-launch their fear campaign. Well-funded organizations disseminate media articles by authors with impressive titles, but no real expertise on the subject. They focus on four talking points:

No one knows how an amendments convention is chosen or how it operates, but
it would be an uncontrollable “constitutional convention,”
it would be controlled or manipulated by Congress and
it might impose radical change.

As you can see, these points are largely inconsistent with each other. And academic research has debunked all of them. For example, we know how the convention is chosen and operates: It is a meeting of state representatives of a kind very common in U.S. history. Nor is it a “constitutional convention.” It is authorized only to offer amendments on prescribed topics, not write a new constitution.

Nor can Congress dictate to it. The convention follows a pre-set agenda and attendees are subject to state legislative direction. Incidentally, the Supreme Court case opponents sometimes cite to “prove” congressional control is a 79-year old minority opinion the courts have long repudiated.

Finally, the convention has no governmental power whatsoever. It may only propose. The states may ratify these proposals or reject or ignore them.

Click here to read the remainder of the article.

Image Photo Credit: Heath Cajandig on Flickr

President Donald Trump

Waste

Will a Convention of States work?

Previous Post

April 4, 2018

Sen. DeMint: "We Have a Terminal Patient Called the United States..."

Next Post

April 6, 2018 Students Fight for the Future of This Nation by Advocating for an Article V Convention of States

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days did the Israelites march around Jericho before the walls fell?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 days 3 days 40 days 12 days