Want Lobbyists to Have Less Power in DC? Here’s How

Last updated on: February 5, 2018 at 5:16 pm by Guest Contributor

Want Lobbyists to Have Less Power in DC? Here’s How 2018-02-05T17:16:25-05:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

1024px-DC_Street_Sign_-_K_Street_NW

The following article was written by Mike Buhler and originally published in the Norfolk Daily News. It describes a recent Convention of States event in Norfolk, Nebraska.

When most people think of amending the U.S Constitution, they think of doing so through Congress.

However, there is another way — and that is what David Schneider from the Convention of States movement told a group of people Friday night at the Eldorado Golf Club in Norfolk.

Schneider and the Convention of States supports calling an Article V convention, where representatives of two-thirds of states (meaning 34 or more) would meet at the convention and their powers would be limited to proposing amendments for state legislatures to vote on and nothing more.

Specifically, the Convention of States supports amending the Constitution to rein in the federal government on fiscal matters, limit the federal government’s power and also to institute term limits on elected officials — basically to reduce the size and scope of the federal government.

“Any amendment that would do that essentially would be germane to the conversation that could be had at the meeting that we also call a convention,” Schneider said. “Obviously this is all we’re trying to do is to get the states together in a meeting-type setting, where each state comes together as a sovereign entity and (is) able to propose real reform for Washington, D.C. We hear a lot about ‘draining the swamp’ or whatever — this is really the tool to be used. The Founding Fathers put it in the Constitution for the states to use, and it’s way past time to actually have called the convention.”

Schneider said that he thought Washington, D.C., was less like a swamp and more like a barrel full of small fish.

“There are 435 congressmen running around that place,” Schneider said. “We compare it to a small town of individuals where the lobbyists can really pick them off one at a time. That’s what I mean as far as the little fish in a big barrel — whereas what we’re trying to decentralize that power back to the states, put the power back in the 50 individual state capitals and make it a lot harder for lobbyists to corner those guys.”

While there have been other amendment-proposing conventions held — the last one being the Colorado River Compact in 1922 — they were not Article V conventions, Schneider said.

“All the other prior conventions were extra-constitutional — they weren’t called within the Constitution,” Schneider said. “Article V is within the Constitution and specifically lays out an action plan for the states to follow. First of all, 34 states have to make an application — nearly identical applications — on a subject matter to hold a convention on that particular topic. The only power that the Constitution gives to the states in the convention setting is to make proposals or suggestions, which would then get turned around and sent back to the states for ratification — just as if Congress had done the same exact thing in the first part of Article V.”

Any proposed Constitutional amendment would then require the approval of three-fourths, or 38, of the each state’s legislatures, which would prevent any radical amendments from becoming law.

“It’s even higher if you think about the different legislative bodies,” Schneider said. “Here in Nebraska, you have only one legislative body, but every other state has two. If you add up all the different legislative in each of the states, that’s 99 legislatures — and of those 99, you’d need at least 75 of them to agree on anything.”

Image Credit: Wikimedia

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 31, 2018

Where Did U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Actually Stand on Article V?

Next Post

February 1, 2018 David Horowitz: Conservatives Need to Amend the Constitution Now

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which ancient city is famous for its towers and the confusion of languages?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sodom Nineveh Babylon Babel