Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Coffee and Crucifix

Home
Catholic
My Critique of Calvinism: PART III – Unconditional Election

My Critique of Calvinism: PART III – Unconditional Election

Last updated on: June 10, 2019 at 10:47 pm by Coffee & Crucifix

My Critique of Calvinism: PART III – Unconditional Election 2019-06-10T22:47:22-06:00 Coffee & Crucifix

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

To a certain extent, Unconditional Election makes sense. I agree that God loves us unconditionally and wants to have a relationship with us. I agree with St. Paul when he says,

“For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God— not because of works, lest any man should boast.”
— Ephesians 2:8-9 RSV

But if God designated certain people to go to Heaven and certain people to go to Hell before they were born, wouldn’t this mean God picks favorites? Does God desire only certain people to experience Paradise, and others to experience eternal suffering?

Such an ideology is known as double-predestination — where deeds are irrelevant, whether good or bad, and their salvation is merely based on whether God chose them before they were born, provided they have faith in Jesus as evidence of being chosen.

Admittedly, I once believed in double-predestination in my early Evangelical years. But what caused me to reconsider it was after repeatedly witnessing people from my own congregation zealously proclaim their faith in Jesus, yet willfully and repeatedly treat me and others like garbage. If actions or good deeds don’t matter in saving faith, why does Jesus put so much emphasis on it in the Gospels? For example,

And behold, one came up to him, saying,
“Teacher, what good deed must I do, to have eternal life?”
And he said to him, “Why do you ask me about what is good? One there is who is good. If you would enter life, keep the commandments.”
He said to him, “Which?”
And Jesus said, “You shall not kill, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother, and, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
The young man said to him, “All these I have observed; what do I still lack?”
Jesus said to him, “If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.”
When the young man heard this he went away sorrowful; for he had great possessions.

— Matthew 19:16-22 RSV

Arminianism and Catholicism both suggest that predestination is not absolute. In this case, God is able to see into the future who would choose Him, and then they became His elect. Jesus died for the sins of the whole world, and not just for Christians in particular. Each person decides for themselves whether or not they want to be saved, and salvation can be lost through willfully rejecting or abusing the free gift of salvation even after accepting it initially. This is what Catholics and Orthodox Christians refer to as a mortal sin.

I am of the belief that God is all-knowing, knows all paths and where they end. I don’t believe God has ‘programmed’ us for evil, but that he desires us to choose the path that leads to Him and loves us enough to allow us to choose Him. If He were to willingly wire someone to follow a path of destruction with full awareness of where that person is heading, that would make Him more sadistic than an adolescent who collects insects for the intent of pulling their legs apart for fun while aware of the pain being inflicted. This is not the God I know from the Bible.

For these reasons, I accept Unconditional Election, but not the Calvinist perspective of it.

NEXT: PART IV – Limited Atonement

PREVIOUS: PART II – Total Depravity

Previous Post

June 10, 2019

My Critique of Calvinism: PART II - Total Depravity

Next Post

June 10, 2019 My Critique of Calvinism: PART IV - Limited Atonement

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Catholicism Christian Life Christian Life Church History Community Eastern Orthodoxy Entertainment Fiction History Mental Health Movies Music Politics Protestantism Reflection Religion Satire Science Fiction Self esteem Self Love Spirituality Star Wars Suicide Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2023 April 2023 May 2022 April 2022 July 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 June 2018 April 2018 January 2018 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who wrote most of the New Testament letters?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John Paul James