At Sundance….. Sloppily Stoking Mass Murder?

Last updated on: January 31, 2013 at 3:57 pm by Barbara Nicolosi

At Sundance….. Sloppily Stoking Mass Murder? 2013-01-31T15:57:26-07:00 Barbara Nicolosi

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Stoker

Written by Wentworth Miller and Erin Cressida Wilson

Directed by Chan-Wook Park

Starring Nicole Kidman, Mia Wasikowski

At Sundance….

This was one of the big premieres that everyone wanted to see, mainly because Nicole Kidman was in the house, but also because it is the first English language movie from the reputed Korean film genius, Chan-wook Park. At the end of the screening, the director, a very humble-not weird looking Korean gentleman walked on stage to acknowledge the “only in Sundance” euphoric raves. And I thought to myself, “Wow. And he doesn’t at all look like a twisted sicko for whom human blood is mostly an aesthetic device and who would gratuitously use child murder to save his third act. Just shows how people’s outsides can fool ya.”

So, where do I start?

Okay, to be fair, this is one of those projects for which the word “story” really means the most fungible of excuses on which to hang a lot of hyper stylized visual motifs and camera work. Trying to mask this flaw in the project, the director said “Stoker” is really “more of a dream – a nightmare” than a movie. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

The only problem is, as anyone will tell you who knows me, I hate hearing about other people’s dreams. For most of us, listening to a dream account is like hearing about a scene from a movie that you haven’t seen. It really is just never the same for the hearer as it was for the viewer. Admit it. How many of you would pay money to sit through somebody else’s dream? And when the dream is a fantasy about murdering people in which the movie motif is that the pleasure in murder is like unto sexual pleasure, it’s impossible not to tin

And then, of course, we have the hyper-sensitivity in this cultural moment that we urgently need to do something about societal violence. Are we really supposed to ignore in our mass brooding, projects like this which thoroughly fetishize violence and human blood? It was impossible for me to screen this film and not keep thinking that somewhere out in the darkness a potential Adam Lanza was licking his lips to realize this particular nightmare.

Now, I do not want to see artists bridled because there are sickos out there. But we ought to challenge the creative community to only go into this “killing can be lovely and a rush” place if they have something very good to say that compensates for the sliming. There are hard truths to tell. But there is also vile infection that is better left in spread.

But really, I don’t think the director was trying to realize a dream. Like so many people out there making movies, he just didn’t manage to pull off a cohesive story here. Gotta give him some credit for honesty, because after the screening when everybody had called him a, you know, undeniable genius, one of the audience fawners actually went over the top and told the director he had “out Hitchcocked Hitchcock.” Director Park blushed to his roots and said that his achievement was not even “an inch of the master, Hitchcock.” To which I feel sure the cinema gods snorted, “Thank you.”

In the way that movie messes usually are, the story here is too convoluted to synthesize in any meaningful way. Suffice it to say that this is a movie about a young girl moving deeply into murderous pathology because of the influence of her serial killing uncle to whom the girl and her mother are both weirdly sexually attracted.

The photography and editing are brilliant, and the acting, while highly stylized is good. But the question always has to be asked, “in the service of what is all this talent?” And the answer is, “In the service of a ridiculous piece of slime.”

Pass on Stoker.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

January 12, 2013

Twisted Oscar Amour

Next Post

January 30, 2013 "So You Think You Have an Idea for a Movie?"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 March 2012 October 2011 September 2011 July 2011 June 2011 April 2011 September 2010 August 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 November 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is traditionally believed to have written the book of Ecclesiastes?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Ezra David Solomon Isaiah