Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Church for Men

Will Livestreaming Kill the Local Church?

Last updated on: April 15, 2019 at 7:33 am   by David Murrow

Will Livestreaming Kill the Local Church? 2019-04-15T07:33:08-09:00 David Murrow

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image licensed from Adobe Stock

In the late 1940s, television networks began carrying live broadcasts of NFL football games.

The result: football became a lot more popular. But stadiums had a lot more empty seats. People were staying home and watching games on TV. In other words, TV was “hurting the gate.” (Gate = money collected at the stadium gate)

So in the mid-1950s the NFL implemented a local blackout policy. TV stations were not allowed to broadcast games within a 75-mile radius of the stadium where the game was played, even if the game was sold out. The policy worked well – for the NFL. Games sold out regularly, and local fans went to great lengths to see their teams play.

Churches find themselves in the same place the NFL was in the late 1940s. They’ve begun livestreaming their services on the Internet – and it appears to be “hurting the gate.” Church attendance is falling all over America, and I believe the proliferation of online sermonsis a major cause.

Churches began livestreaming a few years ago for all the right reasons. They wanted to reach people who might never enter a church building. They wanted to give seekers a way to sample the worship service before they visited. And they wanted to provide an alternative for those who couldn’t make it to church for whatever reason (weather, sick kids, traveling, etc.).

Some writers doubt that livestreaming is hurting attendance. “Why on earth would someone want to watch a sermon online rather than come to church?” they ask.

Here’s why:

Analogy: would you prefer to watch an NFL game on TV or attend a high school football game live? Most fans prefer the former, because of the quality of play. In the same way, future generations of Christians may choose online church over their local live service because of the quality of the preaching and presentation. Online viewers don’t have to watch their local preacher – they can choose from dozens of talented pulpiteers (Craig Groeschel, Tim Keller, Francis Chan, et al.) and absorb this outstanding teaching from the comfort of their favorite easy chair.

Even if we wanted to kill live-streaming tomorrow we couldn’t. The NFL had a monopoly. It is a single, unified league. How would we convince 300,000 churches to stop putting their sermons on the Internet?

If online viewing overtakes live attendance, churches will suffer in three ways:

Financially. Only about 20 percent of church attendees give anything. I would imagine the numbers for online viewers would be in the 1 to 2 percent range. Only churches with enormous online viewership will be able to survive.

Missionally. People who don’t gather don’t serve. It’s very hard to be the hands of Jesus if you don’t know anyone else at your church. Volunteer ranks will shrink.

Socially. People who never gather remain isolated. Jesus promised to be present whenever 2 or 3 gathered in his name – not when one guy watches a sermon on his iPad.

So what do we do?

First, if you don’t livestream yet, think carefully before you do. You can still post sermons online after they’re recorded. Posting won’t hurt your gate as much as live-streaming does.

Second, churches that choose to livestream must increase the quality of their preaching, including the addition of more visual content. Compelling visuals get casual viewers to click. Talking heads do not.

Third, congregations must prepare for an economic future in which fewer than 5 percent of attendees/viewers contribute to the church. Church leaders must focus on cost containment.

Sorry to be such a pessimist, but I’m afraid the church may have unleashed a technology that could expand Christianity’s reach but diminish its influence. Livestreaming could hobble the church missionally, stunt its growth socially and hamstring it financially.

So what do you think? Will live-streaming kill the local church? Leave a comment below or join the conversation on our Facebook page.

Church

Church planting

Communication

evangelism

Leadership

Marketing

Preaching and teaching

Worship

Previous Post



March 30, 2019

Where did the Call-to-Repentance Songs Go?

Next Post



May 11, 2019 Liberal Churches: Why no LGBTQ Youth Leaders?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category boys Bullying children's ministry Church Church planting church structure Communication Conservatism devotion Discipleship eternity evangelism Family Fathers Feminism Feminization giving thanks God Humor Jesus Leadership Liberalism Marketing marriage masculinity men's ministry men's studies mission movies Parenting Pastoring persecution Politics pop culture Prayer Preaching and teaching Prison Ministry religion secularism sex spiritual growth sports women Worship youth culture youth ministry

Select a Month July 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

This chapter in Psalms declares the blessed man who meditates on God's law day and night is like a tree planted by streams. What is its number?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 119 Psalm 100 Psalm 23 Psalm 1

Related posts from Church for Men

Evangelical

Post-COVID Slump: Is it Just a Flesh Wound?

Church for Men

Evangelical

For God's Sake — Shorten Your Sermon

Church for Men

Evangelical

Worship Leader Accused of Playing Well-Known Song

Church for Men

Evangelical

Flame-throwers in Church? How Much Stagecraft is too...

Church for Men

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

Nuggets of Wisdom—Fall 2026

Every few months or so I like to share quotes that I...

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube