Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Church for Men

How to get religion out of politics

Last updated on: April 7, 2015 at 7:54 am   by David Murrow

How to get religion out of politics 2015-04-07T07:54:53-09:00 David Murrow

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

BricksAuthor’s note: I don’t usually use this blog to write about political issues, but since my Saturday post about the RFRA got so many shares I decided to devote one more column to this subject.


The controversy in Indiana has me thinking about the intersection of politics and religion. I’ve read a lot of online articles – and the reader the comments. Many exasperated commenters seem to be longing for a society free of religious influence. A common refrain: “Stop imposing your religion on me.” Or, “Get religion out of politics!”

But the commenters never say how these things might be achieved. How exactly can faith be divorced from politics, given the fact that more than 80% of U.S. citizens claim to practice a religion? The primary way Christians “impose” their views on others is by voting.

As long as people are religious, religious people will influence politics. They’ll do it the way everyone else does: by organizing, by campaigning, and by selecting candidates who reflect their values.

As I see it, there are only three ways to truly insulate the government from religious influence, short of making religion illegal (which ain’t gonna happen – at least not in my lifetime). If you want religion out of politics and public life, one of three things is going to have to happen:

1. Deny religious people the right to vote. Inevitably, people of faith bring their religious viewpoints into the voting booth. They select candidates based on religious criteria. As long believers vote, beliefs will influence politics.

But a purely secular electorate would quickly achieve complete separation of church and state. A law nullifying the votes of religious Americans would be a first step. Allow believers the dignity of voting, but leave their ballots uncounted.

Geolocation technologies would make this a snap. We can already track people with their smartphones. Officials can use software to ignore the votes of anyone who regularly attends a worship service.

This law would face a slew of court challenges, but could possibly be defended under the establishment clause of the First Amendment. A lawyer could plausibly argue that religious people vote according to their faith, which leads to an impermissible interference of church with state.

I know — it seems like a stretch. It might be easier to:

2. Deny religious people the right to hold public office. A more direct way to diminish the influence of religion is to bar religious candidates.

Congress is full of religious men and women (mainly Christians) The United States Congress has 535 members, and not one of them claims to be an atheist. State legislatures are even more religious. The Supreme Court is comprised of six Catholics and three Jews. Every President of the United States has been a self-proclaimed Christian.

But if people of faith were barred from holding office, religion’s grip on politics would be greatly weakened.

Constitutionally, this is a heavier lift. Article VI of the United States Constitution says:

… no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

Secularists could argue (correctly) that the founders meant to prohibit officeholders from having to conform to a particular religion. The opposite – requiring a politician to be non-religious is not a religious test, since there’s no requirement that the candidate hew to a state-chosen faith.

Again, these laws would be tough to defend in court. But there’s one other way to completely separate church from state, while still allowing a form of religious freedom:

3. Update the First Amendment to protect belief  but not exercise. In its current form, the First Amendment to the United States Constitution begins:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

A change of two words would go a long way toward limiting the influence of religion in politics and public life:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free belief therein

This slight revision would still allow people freedom to believe as they choose, but would give legislatures the power to curtail religious practice.

This would be Bill Maher’s vision of paradise. No more pushy street preachers. No greedy televangelists. No little churches on every corner with their obnoxious signs. And no conservatives prattling on about the rights of the unborn.

And no more religious discrimination – period. No more cake controversies. No more abortion clinic protests.

The government could nullify any law that was seen as serving a religious purpose. That process began under Madalyn Murray O’Hair and continues today.

Of course, all three of these changes would be extremely difficult, given how religious our society remains. But there’s hope for ardent secularists. The number of Americans who subscribe to no religion has doubled in the past 50 years. And fewer than half of Americans actually practice their faith on a regular basis. As Christians continue to line up on “the wrong side of history” the nominally religious may ally themselves with secularists to make this vision a reality.

All it takes is the right federal judge.

In the meantime, we can look to the one society on earth that has successfully eliminated religion from politics and public life. This nation enjoys 100% separation of church and state. Not one of its leaders is openly religious. Its citizens enjoy complete freedom to believe what they want – while the public practice of religion is strictly prohibited. As a bonus, this country enjoys complete economic and gender equality – at least in theory.

Want to live in a society that has completely eliminated religion from the public square? It’s called North Korea.


David MurrowDavid Murrow is the author of the bestselling book, Why Men Hate Going to Church. David’s books have sold more than 175,000 copies in 12 languages. He speaks to groups around the world about Christianity’s persistent gender gap. He lives in Alaska with his wife of more than 30 years, professional silk artist Gina Murrow. Learn more about David at his Web site, www.churchformen.com, or join the conversation on his Facebook page, www.facebook.com/churchformen. Don’t forget to share this page by clicking on the links below, or scroll down and leave a comment (right below those annoying ads that pay for this blog). 

 

Church

evangelism

Leadership

pop culture

religion

secularism

Previous Post



April 4, 2015

The Bible’s solution to the wedding dilemma

Next Post



April 8, 2015 Join me at the Reload Leadership Summit in November


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category boys Bullying children's ministry Church Church planting church structure Communication Conservatism devotion Discipleship eternity evangelism Family Fathers Feminism Feminization giving thanks God Humor Jesus Leadership Liberalism Marketing marriage masculinity men's ministry men's studies mission movies Parenting Pastoring persecution Politics pop culture Prayer Preaching and teaching Prison Ministry religion secularism sex spiritual growth sports women Worship youth culture youth ministry

Select a Month July 2020 April 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet lamented over Israel's oppression of the poor?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joel Obadiah Amos Hosea

Related posts from Church for Men

Evangelical

Post-COVID Slump: Is it Just a Flesh Wound?

Church for Men

Evangelical

For God's Sake — Shorten Your Sermon

Church for Men

Evangelical

Why Evangelical Men Prefer Trump over Pence

Church for Men

Evangelical

Worship Leader Accused of Playing Well-Known Song

Church for Men

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube