Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christians in Education

Does the naughty step work?

Last updated on: May 21, 2015 at 7:09 pm   by Gill Robins

Does the naughty step work? 2015-05-21T19:09:43+00:00 Gill Robins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Stick or carrot: which is the more powerful motivator? The balance between reward and punishment has swung like a pendulum for centuries, influencing parenting styles and behaviour management as it goes. Is there a definitive answer?

What happens when we praise children was the focus of my Masters research, so I was interested to read that researchers at Washington University have concluded that a stick, even a very small one, is more effective than a carrot, even if said carrot is supersized. The naughty step, it seems, really does work. But what is working, and why?

First, some background to the debate. As early as the 11th century, Anselm of Canterbury opposed the use of coercion in education, suggesting instead that children should be nurtured. He understood that a child’s character is formed by social environment and the quality of care within it, and that the future of the adult is also shaped by this early experience.  Jump forward to the 17th century, when John Locke opposed the use of reward on the basis that it focused attention on achieving the reward itself and so stifled natural curiosity, while Rousseau’s fictitious 18th century pupil Emile, freed from the trammels of a transmission model of learning, developed the skill of thinking things out for himself. The early educational theorists would have fitted comfortably into The Govian Blob.

But then along came the behaviourists: John B Watson, Edward Lee Thorndike and that nemesis of creative learning, B F Skinner. They argued that the consistent application of praise could condition social and learning behaviours and thus behaviourism became the holy grail of behaviour management for decades. Enter stage left: star charts, certificates, reward assemblies and, ultimately, the bribery of the Vivo Miles fulfilment centre.  The pendulum was pulled only partially the other way during the last century by the constructivist thinkers Piaget, Vygotsky, Rogers and Bruner, so now our schools mostly have a hybrid of two philosophies, neither of which provides the complete answer.

With Ed Deci and Richard Ryan, research into learning motivation took on a whole new momentum, followed by Carol Dweck’s formulation of growth and fixed mindset learning theory. Coming right up to date, Steve Reiss of Ohio State University has defined 16 intrinsic motivators and he warns against assuming that we can motivate others without understanding their value systems. He uses the example of the sports coach telling his team that their next match will be a test of character. Reiss assessed thousands of athletes in the course of his research and found ‘that, as a group, they do not care much about their character. They care about winning’. To motivate others, we have to appeal to their values, rather than assuming that ours necessarily the better ones.

So is there a Christian perspective on the use of praise? I think so. My research suggests that children are very quick to see through the sort of phoney praise that is designed to boost their self-esteem. They also place little value on praise or rewards given to them by adults whom they either don’t know or don’t respect. Time after time, conversations showed that what they valued was their relationship with the giver, usually regardless of what was being given. In a classroom context, they valued privacy, fairness, sincerity, honesty, and praise which acted as some sort of communication, either about learning or behaviour. Mostly, they valued being noticed. At home, they valued treats out of the ordinary that made them feel loved and special. When praise was part of a trusting, mutually respectful relationship, children described outcomes of joy; encouragement; motivation to do better or to keep trying; hope, and understanding – of the person praising them as well as of themselves.

I have written elsewhere about our role as pedagogues and also as encouragers just as Barnabas was an encourager. The Bible is full of examples of encouragement: Hebrews 3:13 tells us to ‘encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today”’.  1Thessalonians 5:11 says ‘Therefore encourage one another and build one another up’. Acts 20:1-2 recounts how the apostle Paul ‘sent for the disciples and, after encouraging them, said goodbye and set out for Macedonia. He travelled through that area, speaking many words of encouragement to the people’.

But on the flip side of the praise coin is sanction – Titus 2:15 tells us that we should both ‘encourage and rebuke with authority’. It’s not a case of either stick or carrot; more a matter of the balance between the two. If we have built a loving, trusting and mutually respectful relationship with a child, either as a parent or a teacher, we are in a position to administer loving discipline. And this is where the research is absolutely right – a small stick is quite enough. The naughty step works just fine, because it’s reflecting on and understanding the disappointment or distress that misbehaviour causes that effects repentance and change.

So in answer to the perennial question of whether the stick or the carrot is better, the answer is actually neither. It’s all about both, in the context of relationship. Without a strong relationship, either is  pretty limited in effectiveness. As Christians living in relationship with God, that makes complete sense.

Holistic teaching

Pedagogy

Values based education

Previous Post



May 12, 2015

Everyone belongs to God

Next Post



June 4, 2015 We need to talk about poverty


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible perspectives Book review General Guest Holistic teaching Identity Leadership Mental health Nehemiah Pedagogy Religious Education Respect and tolerance Role of faith in education Testing Uncategorized Values based education

Select a Month September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who parted the Red Sea for the Israelites?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jacob God Aaron Moses

Related posts from Christians in Education

Evangelical

Religion and belief in education: is it time...

Christians in Education

Evangelical

We need to talk about poverty

Christians in Education

Evangelical

Moral bankruptcy in a growing economy: just what...

Christians in Education

Evangelical

Learning to say 'Maybe'

Christians in Education

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Creation as Secondary to Judgment

Creating is a most human act. A good canonical (classical) education will...

The REST of Your Life: A Creative Wrestles...

This week I had a conversation with a good friend from church....

Nuggets of Wisdom—Fall 2026

Every few months or so I like to share quotes that I...

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube