Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Christian Piatt

Home
Progressive Christian
When I Think of Heaven

When I Think of Heaven

Last updated on: April 12, 2012 at 9:05 pm by Christian Piatt

When I Think of Heaven 2012-04-12T21:05:49+00:00 Christian Piatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The popularity of Colton Burpo’s story, called Heaven is For Real,, about experiencing heaven while undergoing surgery raises very mixed feelings for me. On its own, it’s a nice story. It presents a hopeful outlook of what happens to us after death, and there’s little in the short tome to get worked up about.

But it’s a story. It’s an account retold by a pastor’s son while under heavy anesthesia, offering imagery of the afterlife that props up nearly every stereotypical description of heaven, from the clouds and halos to angels with wings. Though it hardly resonates with my understanding of heaven, I don’t have a problem with folks embracing such an idea of what heaven is for them.

Pastors who have co-opted otherwise benign stories to buttress their “turn or burn” rhetoric from the pulpit? That’s another story.

What’s fascinating to me, though, is that an increasing number of westerners – Christians in particular – are rethinking heaven and the whole concept of life after death. It’s even stirring within evangelical camps, as described in a recent TIME Magazine cover story, “Rethinking Heaven.” In it, author Jon Meacham offers what moderate-conservative Anglican Bishop N. T. Wright says about heaven in his work. From Meacham’s article:

What if Christianity is not about enduring this sinful, fallen world in search of a reward of eternal rest? What if the authors of the New Testament were actually talking about a bodily resurrection in which God brings together the heavens and the earth in a wholly new, wholly redeemed creation?

I read Meacham’s interpretation of Wright with ambivalence: a feeling I’m quite familiar with in encountering Wright. He’s a brilliant mind and one of my favorite New Testament scholars from a more conservative view. And the proposition of challenging the millennial notion of “enduring this sinful, fallen world in search of a reward of eternal rest” rings true in my own heart. But the Wrights hangs on that challenge the caveats of bodily resurrection and God taking action to reconcile heaven and earth into a single creation.

You had me, N.T., and then you lost me.

Interestingly, Meacham (who describes himself as a poor Christian in the article) offers his own narrative on the subject with which I found much more traction:

Heaven thus becomes, for now, the reality one creates in the service of the poor, the sick, the enslaved, the oppressed. It is not paradise in the sky but acts of selflessness and love that bring God’s sacred space and grace to a broken world suffused with tragedy until, in theological terms, the unknown hour when the world we struggle to piece together is made whole again. We could do worse than think in such terms.

Yes!

First, a word of affirmation for this perceived shift in evangelical thinking about heaven, despite my own issues with it. For one, a theology that binds the welfare of our present, physical world with the Kingdom of God for which they ultimately long creates natural common ground for folks to work and dialogue together who have found it difficult to do so in the past. Environmental stewardship, social justice for the oppressed and setting the wrongs of this world right trump the fetish-like millennial obsession with end-times, being victorious over the wicked and assuming there’s little reason to prolong the planet’s existence. This is something most of us can agree on, including not only Christians of all stripes, but those from other religions as well or even humanists who share the common values of compassion and environmental sensitivity.

But my issue with Wright’s version of heaven is that it still waits for God to “do something.” It presumes the existence of some anthropomorphic “Other,” who is waiting for us to pass muster, so that heaven and earth can be reconciled to one another. It seems to me that, though Wright criticizes “wait for God’s reward” theology, he replaces it with a disappointingly similar “work for God’s reward” way of thinking.

But what if there is no “other?” What if there is no greater will disassociated from humankind that waits in observation of our stumbling, fumbling attempts to put the puzzle we’ve broken back together?

What if heaven really is what we make it?

If one understands God more like the potential energy at the source of the Big Bang, or the transcendence of Love that gives life meaning, or the pull within us that guides our determination of right and wrong, then there is no need for an Other to sweep in and save us. Salvation, then, takes on a progressive, historical trajectory, toward which we strive but perhaps never reach in life. And heaven, rather than being an “adding to” or “replacing of” becomes more of a process of subtraction.

Talk about a hard sell in a consumer culture! But consider this: We can feel quite differently about the very same situation, depending on our experience, values or understanding. I think of the scene in the TV show, LOST, when Bernard is hell-bent on getting off the godforsaken island, which has become his prison. However, when his wife, Rose, reveals to him that she has a terminal disease which only the island can prevent from progressing, the thing that was his hell at once becomes his salvation.

Maybe it’s not about a better time or place. Maybe it’s not about being rescued. Maybe it’s more about making peace with what is. Maybe it’s about a collective orientation, rather than a change of scenery. Maybe it can’t fully be realized during this life, but perhaps we can achieve faint glimpses of if by striving to make peace with all that binds us, and by helping others do likewise.

Maybe we’re imperfect portraits of the God we long for. Maybe heaven already is, while also not yet being fully realized. It would help explain why Jesus could endure what, at the time, may have felt life both a failed ministry, and senseless suffering and death. When the full reality of heaven – perfect, unencumbered existence – is grasped (for most of us upon death; for Christ, perhaps sooner) all else falls into proper perspective.

And we are free.

Previous Post

April 11, 2012

Rainwater Foundation's Fight for Dementia Cures

Next Post

April 13, 2012 White Folk Poppin' and Lockin' for Jesus

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category atonement belief bible Bill O'Reilly Buddhism CCM children christian piatt christianity Contemporary Christian Music current events derek flood Easter education Everyday Sunday faith faith and culture Frank Schaeffer great commission Haaz Sleiman Hobby Lobby Homebrewed Culture humor ISIS Jesus John Paul Lederach Killing Jesus LGBTQ marc driscoll Mission Year Music My Jesus Project Nat Geo parenting politics popular culture postChristian prison reform Ray rice religion republicans sacrifice sexuality theology Uncategorized video violence wild goose festival World Vision young adults

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What sea did Moses part?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dead Sea Mediterranean Sea Red Sea Sea of Galilee