Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Christian Piatt

Home
Progressive Christian
Mules, Sex and Rick Santorum

Mules, Sex and Rick Santorum

Last updated on: February 23, 2012 at 5:21 pm by Christian Piatt

Mules, Sex and Rick Santorum 2012-02-23T17:21:34+00:00 Christian Piatt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As a blogger, I could not ask for a more interesting presidential candidate than Rick Santorum. Not only does he exhibit latent ambitions to preach from the pulpit; he also LOVES to talk about sex.

While most candidates will talk around matters of sex and sexuality, Rick goes right for it. He takes on sexuality with the passion of someone who, well, spends an awful lot of time thinking about the many kinds of sexual acts we’re supposedly not meant to engage in.

Santorum’s most recent foray into the bedroom had to do with birth control. No, not whether affordable birth control should be made available to all women, or whether the government has any role in providing it. He takes on the age-old religious question of whether birth control, in itself, is morally acceptable.

Never mind that, at one time or another, more than 95% of women in the U.S. use or have used birth control. Sure you want to go there, Rick?

According to Santorum, the use of birth control (and he makes no qualification for any exceptions that I’ve seen) is “a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.” Although following this, he does concede that “conjugal” sex between a married people is acceptable, he asserts that sex is really all about reproduction.

While I’ll agree that, if you want a baby, the easiest way to go about it is to have sex, I think that the argument about sex only being for reproduction is weak at best. Believe it or not, it was my mom, Linda Brendle (yes, the Southern Baptist one), who raised the question about whether mules (most of which are born sterile) have sexual urges or engage in sexual activity.

First of all, talking with my mom about mule sex is a little weird, but that didn’t catch me off guard as much as her ruminations about the soundness of a GOP candidate’s positions on sexuality.

But back to the matter at hand, I looked it up and sure enough, mules not only exhibit sexual urges, but they also actually have sex. Why, you ask, given the fact that there’s no reproductive value in a sterile species having such urges?

Ask Rick Santorum. He seems to be the expert.

Then there’s the matter of situational sterility. I can tell you first-hand that being “fixed” does absolutely nothing to stem one’s sexual urges. Having two kids, a full-time job and turning forty, on the other hand, tends to take a bit of a toll. But the only thing different about post-vasectomy sex is the absence of additional babies, for which I’m deeply grateful.

I also think back to the two male cats we used to have named Miles and Lenny. Both were fixed, and as I mentioned, they were both dudes. But at least once a day, I’d look over to find Miles humping Lenny’s face. So if the way God meant sex to be was between only two married cats – er, I mean people – then why in the world would my pets engage in gay, sterile, face humping?

I digress.

The point is that sex, sexual attraction and all that comes with it is clearly about so much more than making babies. It’s about emotional bonding. It can also be pretty freaking fun. If it were only about babies, then other species would never engage in same-sex acts (which they do), inherently sterile species wouldn’t even want to have sex (which they do), and my gay cats would not have used each others’ faces for seat cushions (which they totally did, a lot).

Rather than imposing some divine moral intent over the whole of sexuality, why can’t we look at it as a powerful act between two God-created creatures that should be treated as such? It’s fun and awesome and all that, but it also has the potential along with it both to create and destroy life. It can bring people together, and it can tear them apart. And it can do both whether a couple is or isn’t married. I could elaborate, but I think we all get the point here.

Ultimately, I can’t help but feel that Santorum’s take on birth control falls along the same lines as the Texas and Virginia laws which require women to undergo transvaginal ultrasounds before considering an abortion. Both tend to objectify the woman, compromising her rights for a moral agenda, largely put in place by straight (?) white middle-aged men.

I’m glad that Rick Santorum is willing to talk about sex. Now, if we can only get him and his ilk to talk about women as equals…

transvaginal ultrasound

women's health

women's rights

Previous Post

February 23, 2012

Sh*t Emergent Christians Say

Next Post

February 24, 2012 Evangelical 2.0: The Deception of Driscoll's Acts 29 Network

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category atonement belief bible Bill O'Reilly Buddhism CCM children christian piatt christianity Contemporary Christian Music current events derek flood Easter education Everyday Sunday faith faith and culture Frank Schaeffer great commission Haaz Sleiman Hobby Lobby Homebrewed Culture humor ISIS Jesus John Paul Lederach Killing Jesus LGBTQ marc driscoll Mission Year Music My Jesus Project Nat Geo parenting politics popular culture postChristian prison reform Ray rice religion republicans sacrifice sexuality theology Uncategorized video violence wild goose festival World Vision young adults

Select a Month December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What currency did Judas receive for betraying Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Copper Silver Bronze Gold