Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christian Democracy

Yes, Healthcare Is a Right

Last updated on: June 16, 2018 at 10:54 am   by Jack Quirk

Yes, Healthcare Is a Right 2018-06-16T10:54:21-05:00 Jack Quirk

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They’re still at it. Another court challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is taking place in the Northern District Court of Texas in a suit brought by Texas and nine other states. [1] To understand the basis of the challenge, we must call to mind the Supreme Court ruling that upheld the “individual mandate” portion of the ACA in 2012. In that case, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius [2], the Court held that, while Congress has no power to command the citizenry to buy health insurance, the “penalty” for not buying health insurance was actually to be understood as a tax, and was, therefore, constitutional.

But last year this tax was eliminated by Congress. There is no longer a tax for failure to buy health insurance. The ACA still has a mandate to purchase health insurance, but the mandate is now toothless.

Now since the imposition of a tax for failure to buy health insurance was designed to incentivize its purchase, and since the purpose of that incentive was to spread costs and keep premiums down, Texas and the other plaintiff states are saying that the purpose of the ACA has been defeated. Somehow, that makes it unconstitutional they say.

Of course, two features that will disappear along with the ACA if the plaintiffs are successful are the subsidies that help people afford insurance, as well as the rule against excluding pre-existing conditions—indeed, there will be no requirement that health insurers accept people with pre-existing conditions at all.

Ordinarily it would be the task of the Justice Department to come to the defense of this federal legislation. In this case, however, the Trump administration has declined to do so. [3] But if the plaintiffs prevail, that will be bad news for people with pre-existing conditions, and those who can’t afford health insurance without the subsidies provided by the ACA.

There are voices to be heard, even among Catholics, that health insurance or healthcare shouldn’t be the business of government. These would certainly applaud a victory on the part of Texas and the other states. But should healthcare be a concern of government? Does Catholic social teaching call for government’s involvement?

The answer is yes, quite unambiguously so.

The Catechism tells us that it “is the role of the state to defend and promote the common good of civil society, its citizens, and intermediate bodies.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), §1910) [4] The “common good requires the social well-being and development of the group itself. Development is the epitome of all social duties. Certainly, it is the proper function of authority to arbitrate, in the name of the common good, between various particular interests; but it should make accessible to each what is needed to lead a truly human life: food, clothing, health, work, education and culture, suitable information, the right to establish a family, and so on.” (CCC, §1908)

“Concern for the health of its citizens requires that society help in the attainment of living-conditions that allow them to grow and reach maturity: food and clothing, housing, health care, basic education, employment, and social assistance.” (CCC, §2288) [5] “The political community has a duty to honor the family, to assist it, and to ensure especially…in keeping with the country’s institutions, the right to medical care, assistance for the aged, and family benefits….” (CCC, §2211) [6] [7] And Pope Francis reminded us not too long ago in the apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium that it “is vital that government leaders and financial leaders take heed and broaden their horizons, working to ensure that all citizens have dignified work, education and healthcare.” (§205) [8]

So, according to Catholic social teaching, it is a governmental and societal responsibility that every citizen have access to necessary healthcare. We can dispute about what the best way of accomplishing that would be. But, if we are to claim adherence to Catholic teaching, we may not ignore the requirement. And that means that we must be sincere about coming up with solutions that will actually work. It is, therefore, inconsistent with Catholic social teaching to get rid of the ACA and replace it with nothing or something worse.

 

The icon of St. Joseph the Worker is by Daniel Nichols.

Please go like Christian Democracy on Facebook here.  Join the discussion on Catholic social teaching here.

Affordable Care Act

Catholic Social Teaching

Christian Democracy

United States Constitution

Universal health care

Affordable Care Act

catholic social teaching

Christian Democracy

U.S. Constitution

unoversal health care

Previous Post



June 14, 2018

Free Speech Cake Baking

Next Post



June 20, 2018 Christian Democracy: Radio Version, First Installment.


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Affordable Care Act Arbitration Agreements Catholic Social Teaching Christian Democracy climate change Communism Consistent life Constitutional Rights Discrimination distributism Employment Contracts First Amendment Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Speech Government Immigration Ireland Israel Jerusalem Labor Magisterium Middle East Monarchism Neoliberalism Palestine Palestinian State Political parties Pope Pro-Life Movement Religious Discrimination Religious Freedom RIght to Life right-to-work Ruth Bader Ginsburg Same Sex Marriage socialism subsidiarity Supreme Court syndicates Uncategorized United States United States Constitution Universal health care Unjust law Western Society

Select a Month June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Solomon famously judge between"two women and what disputed item?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A sheep A ring A house A baby

Related posts from Christian Democracy

Catholic

Government Behind the Mask

Christian Democracy

Catholic

A Blank Check for Waging War

Christian Democracy

Catholic

Bernie Sanders Tacks Distributist

Christian Democracy

Catholic

Catholic Teaching and Taxes

Christian Democracy

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube