Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Christian Democracy

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Just War and the Strike on Syria

Just War and the Strike on Syria

Last updated on: April 16, 2018 at 6:29 pm by Jack Quirk

Just War and the Strike on Syria 2018-04-16T18:29:31-05:00 Jack Quirk

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The recent events involving yet another U.S. military action abroad makes it incumbent upon us to evaluate this latest attack on Syria in light of the Just War Doctrine, which has been developed by the Catholic Church to assess the moral legitimacy of a nation’s use of its armed forces. The Catechism lays it out this way:

“The strict conditions for legitimate defense by military force require rigorous consideration. The gravity of such a decision makes it subject to rigorous conditions of moral legitimacy. At one and the same time:

“— the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

“— all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

“— there must be serious prospects of success;

“— the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

www.kremlin.ru

“These are the traditional elements enumerated in what is called the ‘just war’ doctrine.

“The evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, §2309) [1]

It is important to remember that all four of the conditions must be met in order for a military action to be morally justifiable. It is insufficient if only three, two, or one of the conditions are satisfied. Let’s take a look at the American attack on Syria and see if it was in compliance with the Just War Doctrine, taking each of the four conditions in order.

The first condition is that “the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain….” But Syria hasn’t been inflicting any damage, or threatening to inflict any damage on the United States, so the U.S. cannot claim that it is defending itself from harm. Moreover, the government of Bashar al-Assad is inflicting harm only within the borders of Syria, which would indicate that it is not inflicting damage on the family of nations.

Some will object that the refugees coming out of Syria have caused an economic drain on the family of nations, so that an attack on Syria can be justified on that ground. But in order to satisfy the first condition the damage must be of sufficient gravity. We should think of destruction of cities and loss of life in this connection. Causing a need of humanitarian aid simply isn’t serious enough. Otherwise a country’s causing us expenditure by its policies would be a legitimate basis for waging war against it, which would hardly be a rational approach to international conflict.

The second condition is that “all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective….” To analyze this condition we should assume the truth of the assertion that the al-Assad government did indeed use chemical weapons on its own people. The public does not have access to the evidence, and it seems as though it would be highly irrational for al-Assad to do such a thing, and invite international hostility, while he is on the verge of victory. But let’s assume the truth of the accusation for purposes of argument.

www.kremlin.ru.

If the Syrian government is indeed using chemical weapons on its own citizens after being warned repeatedly not to do so, and after assurances were made that it was no longer in possession of such weapons, then it must be acknowledged that further negotiations are not likely to be fruitful. Bashar al-Assad is going to do what he wants to do, and continuing to jawbone about it isn’t going to be effective. This condition, then, by itself, would justify the American attack. But, again, all of the conditions must be met in order to satisfy the Just War Doctrine.

The third condition is that “there must be serious prospects of success….” Now while the presence of the Russians in Syria provided more of a challenge than would be the case otherwise, there was no real likelihood that the American armed forces would be unable to accomplish its limited mission. The Russians may have threatened to intercept the American missiles, but Vladimir Putin is not irrational, and engaging the United States military and starting World War III was not seriously to be anticipated. So there was sufficient likelihood of the mission’s success to satisfy the third condition.

The fourth condition is that “the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated, with the proviso that the “power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.” There was some concern expressed before the attack that a nuclear war could be sparked due to the presence of the Russians in Syria. But although an attack on Russia itself would certainly intensify the likelihood of nuclear war, there wasn’t any real likelihood that a non-nuclear attack on a Russian ally was going to provoke such a response. The Russians are as aware as the Americans that a nuclear war would have no winners.

It appears, then, that three out of the four Just War conditions point to the legitimacy of the attack. But, of course, that is not enough. Syria does not present a threat to either the United States individually, or to the body of nations as a whole sufficient to have justified the American military action.

In the next installment, barring some dramatic occurrence, we’ll take a look at the just war criteria of St. Thomas Aquinas, and their application to the American attack on Syria.

The icon of St. Joseph the Worker is by Daniel Nichols.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 12, 2018

When the Salt Loses Its Taste

Next Post

April 19, 2018 St. Thomas Aquinas and the Attack on Syria

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion Affordable Care Act Arbitration Agreements Catholic Social Teaching Christian Democracy climate change Communism Consistent life Constitutional Rights Discrimination distributism Employment Contracts First Amendment Free Exercise Clause Freedom of Speech Government Immigration Ireland Israel Jerusalem Labor Magisterium Middle East Monarchism Neoliberalism Palestine Palestinian State Political parties Pope Pro-Life Movement Religious Discrimination Religious Freedom RIght to Life right-to-work Ruth Bader Ginsburg Same Sex Marriage socialism subsidiarity Supreme Court syndicates Uncategorized United States United States Constitution Universal health care Unjust law Western Society

Select a Month June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian observance celebrates the descent of the Holy Spirit on the apostles?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pentecost Ash Wednesday Epiphany Ascension