Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Christian Crier

Home
About

Home
Evangelical
The Code of Hammurabi and the Law of Moses: Similarities, Differences and Common Purposes

The Code of Hammurabi and the Law of Moses: Similarities, Differences and Common Purposes

Last updated on: October 25, 2017 at 9:00 am by Jack Wellman

The Code of Hammurabi and the Law of Moses: Similarities, Differences and Common Purposes 2017-10-19T15:50:23-05:00 Jack Wellman

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What are the differences and similarities between the Law of Hammurabi and the Law of Moses? Did one borrow from the other?

Ancient Law Books

After ancient Israel’s exodus from Egypt, God gave to them the Book of the Covenant, a book which contained the laws of God by which Israel was to live. It is sometimes called the Law of Moses. Another ancient people, the Babylonians, had their own law called the Code or Law of Hammurabi. In reading both, we notice that there are striking similarities, but there are also vast differences. And the differences show how one is far superior to the other. The source of the Book of the Covenant is God; the source for the Code of Hammurabi ancient Mesopotamia, or Babylon to be specific. The Code of Hammurabi is a well-preserved Babylonian code of law by which the nation is to live by, so both are sets of laws designed to help society function in ways so that it could prosper, and these laws contained particular civil rights.

Similarities

The Book of the Covenant is sometimes called the Law of Moses, but the Book of the Covenant and the Law of Hammurabi used in the Babylonian Empire, seem closely related in the contextual and legal language, so it’s easy to see how the Covenantal Laws of Israel and other nations might have influenced one another. There is also a shared common purpose because both contain serious consequences for those who break which break the law(s), so the consequences act as a deterrent to crime. For example, both share in the protection of marriage, family, property damage, injury, murder, robbery, theft, kidnapping and even in commerce, so they both act as stabilizers of society. For Israel, they constituted expectations from God in how we are to live with our neighbors, and I personally see this as foundational for the U.S. and other nations because our laws encourage both citizens and authorities to live in relative peace. Both laws share similar expectations for society and for the stability of the nation.

Code of Hammurabi. Artist, Unknown

Differences

As for as differences between the two laws, the authority or source are different; one is from God and one from Hammurabi. One has reasons that are self-serving (Hammurabi), but God’s laws are always for the benefit of the people. In Martha Roth’s, The Laws of Hammurabi, she writes that Hammurabi felt that he was chosen by the god of Enlil, only one among many, to be made the shepherd of Babylon (lines i.27-41, p. 336). Moses knew that He was a chosen vessel of God, the One and True God, to be shepherd the nation of Israel. He was a shepherd when God called him, and died as one. Other differences concerned the violation of laws of Hammurabi which constitutes violations against Hammurabi himself and the nation, but violation of the Covenant are sins against God Himself, even though the people also had been sinned against. Different too was the fact that God was interested in creating a kingdom of priests, a holy nation, but Hammurabi’s motivation is for prosperity and longevity on the throne. Therein lies significant differences…the Covenant protects the disenfranchised members of society, regardless of their place or rank in society, while the Code of Hammurabi is interested only in the free men class and gives special protection to the middle and higher social classes of Babylon. This is seen in the laws of the Code as the awilu are given special status and protection but the lower classes, the wardu (slaves) and the mushkenu (free person of low estate) have no such protection. That makes the lowest classes of the Babylonian society significantly more liable. [1] While biblical law sees human life as more valuable than material possession, the Code treated significant material loss as sometimes worthy of death (Code of Hammurabi, p 338). [2] Conversely, God requires a life for a life, but the Laws of Hammurabi may only require financial compensation, and the life of a slave might only bring a fine. [3] I find it interesting that silver was the main currency of Babylon, but gold is the primary precious metal used in the inner sanctuary.

One is Superior

The superiority of God’s Laws is that obedience (and holiness) is the desired outcome, so that a relationship with God is made possible, but the Law of Hammurabi’s goal is for longevity of the king and prosperity for the nation, regardless of who gets hurt. For example, the death penalty for theft (Hammurabi) seems extremely harsh as compared to the Covenant which required restitution. The death penalty for thievery in Babylon seems to indicate that the nation valued goods over human life, while the Covenant valued people over things, not requiring a thief to die. Another example was when anyone caused a pregnant woman’s child to die. The Book of the Covenant required a life for a life while the Code required they pay a fine. This Code clearly indicates a lesser value on human life Covenant. God sees the sanctity of life…the Code does not.

The Law and Salvation

Both the Code and the Covenant share common ground in that they contribute to civility and order in society, and they bring criminals to justice, however, the Covenant stands supreme over the Code because of its Author Who is no respecter of persons. We cannot say the same for the Code of Hammurabi which had regard for a person’s social and financial standing. Paul understood that the law was a means of knowing what sin was (Rom 7:7), and the impossibility of presenting ourselves before a holy God, but thankfully, the New Covenant shows us that “the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law [and that] the righteousness of God [is] through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe” (Rom 3:21-22). That is salvation. The Code has no such ability to make a person righteous because “one is [only] justified by faith apart from works of the law” (Rom 3:28), and no amount of law keeping could ever make one perfect. Even so, we should still strive to “uphold the law” (Rom 3:31c), but the good news is that even though we can’t possibly fully obey the law, since “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God [we] are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith” (Rom 3:23-25a).

Conclusion

If it were true that ancient Israel copied and used the Law of Hammurabi for the basis of the Book of the Covenant, it begs the question; why did the Israelites only use some of their law and not all of it? They certainly didn’t take part of the Code that provided for the poor, widowers, and orphans. The Code had no such protection to help, protect, and defend those who could not help or defend themselves. Moses certainly didn’t copy the laws from the Code which favored the wealthy like the Law of Hammurabi had. What the Babylonians should have done was to copy the Book of the Covenant from Moses, because it didn’t have laws favoring the rich and powerful. This Book doesn’t place products over people. It regards the sanctity of life of infinitely more value than just paying a fine. That’s because it’s from the Author of Life.

Article by Jack Wellman

Jack Wellman is Pastor of the Mulvane Brethren Church in Mulvane Kansas. Jack is a writer at Christian Quotes and also the Senior Writer at What Christians Want To Know whose mission is to equip, encourage, and energize Christians and to address questions about the believer’s daily walk with God and the Bible. You can follow Jack on Google Plus or check out his book Teaching Children the Gospel available on Amazon.

1 In Babylonian society there were mainly three classes; the awilu, a free person of the upper class; the wardu, or slave; and the mushkenu, a free person of low estate, who ranked legally between the awilu and the wardu. “Babylonia Babylonian Social Hierarchy.” Bible History. http://www.biblehistory.com/babylonia/BabyloniaSocial_Hierarchy.htm (Accessed Oct 16th, 2017).

2 Desmond T. Alexander. From Paradise to the Promised Land (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Publish, 2012), 217.

3 Ibid., p. 219, 210.

Page numbers are cited from the assigned reading of Martha Roth, The Laws of Hammurabi.

Previous Post

October 23, 2017

Who Killed Jesus?

Next Post

October 27, 2017 Four Core Characteristics of God

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Bible Answers Bible Definitions Bible Story Bible Study Bible Verses Christian Books Christian Entertainment Christian Fathers Christian Mothers Christian Quotes Devotional Famous Christians Music News Parables Prayers Quotes Sunday School Lesson Uncategorized Youth Sermons

Select a Month October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who prophesied the exact birthplace of the Messiah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jeremiah Micah Isaiah Daniel