CBS’s ‘Intelligence’ Tests the Trade-Offs of Technology

Last updated on: January 27, 2014 at 8:00 am by Geoffrey Reiter

CBS’s ‘Intelligence’ Tests the Trade-Offs of Technology 2014-01-27T06:46:56-07:00 Geoffrey Reiter

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Warning: This article includes spoilers for the early episodes of CBS’s Intelligence.

On January 7, CBS launched its most popular show of the new season, Intelligence. Created by Michael Seitzman, Intelligence boasts an impressive cast that includes Josh Holloway (Lost), Megan Ory (Once Upon a Time), Marg Helgenberger (CSI), and John Billingsley (Star Trek: Enterprise). The series follows Gabriel Vaughn (Holloway), an agent commissioned by the fictional US Cyber Command to act as an “advanced” operative: he has been neurologically connected to the global digital grid and can call to mind any available data and imagery. However, he’s not always emotionally stable: he’s obsessed with learning the truth of his wife, a deep-cover operative herself, and thus Riley Neal (Ory) is tasked by supervisor Lilian Strand (Helgenberger) to be his partner.

Intelligence is a formulaic show, but its writers deftly manage the formula. The actors inhabit their roles ably (even Ory, of whom I was skeptical), and the dialogue, if not brilliant, is certainly lively. More importantly, the writing staff thus far seem aware of Intelligence’s potential for exploring complex (and very relevant) questions of technological ethics. Gabriel’s upgrades may be a bit too much like the Intersect in Chuck, but this show’s vector of approach diverges widely from NBC’s comic spy series. Chuck‘s Intersect was a handy MacGuffin designed almost entirely to manufacture delightfully convoluted (and amusing) situations. Gabriel’s implants are more realistic in their execution, and though the writing is witty, the tenor of Intelligence is certainly more serious than Chuck ever aspired to be.

In the pilot episode, I was struck by the frequent use of the word “trade.” It is employed by Helgenberger’s Strand during a conversation with her Chinese counterpart (Rosalind Chao) as they work to track down rogue Chinese agents bent on creating a female equivalent to Gabriel. She suggests trade as an alternative to more combative relations. The implication of trading in this context and elsewhere is, of course, that one must give something to get something. But in the intelligence trade, how much must be sacrificed to get national security? Must Gabriel trade some of his humanity for the sake of becoming “advanced” enough to fight global crime and protect American interests?

To its credit, Intelligence resists the impulse to answer these questions tacitly. There are certainly some early gosh-wow moments when we see Gabriel employing his “party trick” abilities (as Riley calls them). Still, the writers maintain a healthy unease about Gabriel’s relationship to his enhancements. They cost him personally, as we see in the third episode (“Mei Chen Returns”) when his Chinese doppelganger inflicts psychic and physiological damage by effectively hacking into his mind. And in utilizing his upgrades, Gabriel’s brain not only displays information but imaginatively reconstructs and extrapolates scenarios from that information, an effect unforeseen by the chip’s creators. Such projections suggest that humans might be more than mere biological machines or, at the very least, that the human brain is a far different and more complex creation than any mere piece of technology.

The greatest challenge to Gabriel’s humanity thus far comes in the third episode, when Mei Chen (Faye Kingslee) intrudes upon his consciousness. In the climactic scene, she continues the episode’s running use of Genesis quotations by positioning herself as an Eve to Gabriel’s Adam. As his colleagues at Cyber Command successfully defeat Mei Chen, Gabriel retorts, “You’re not Eve. You’re the serpent.” This parallel is instructive, for like the serpent, Mei Chen has essentially tempted Gabriel to forsake his true humanity in the false hope of becoming something greater. She herself admits that her “pleasures” are all that keep her human, pleasures she voluntarily labels “deviant.” In exorcising her from his mind, Gabriel turns away (for now) from the attempt to transcend his humanity, to “evolve” (a word often used in the show) into something else. But in so doing, he also must accept the implications of his humanity, including the painful vulnerability of love (as opposed to mere pleasure).

Intelligence is, of course, an action show first and foremost, and it holds no pretensions otherwise. Even so, such intentions need not prevent it from examining serious and thought-provoking contemporary issues. As twenty-first century humankind integrates technology in ever more intimate ways, we will be increasingly called upon to ask fundamental questions about our identity and special distinctiveness, doctrines that Christians could once take for granted. CBS’s latest action series in its first few episodes has certainly staked no claims at definitively addressing these questions, yet thus far it seems poised to parallel the Christian belief that human persons are more than the sums of their parts and that we must be wary of what we trade to gain knowledge — or intelligence.

Photo via CBS.

Of the Moment

Television

artificial intelligence

Genesis

Intelligence

Previous Post

January 27, 2014

The Big Chop: A Theology of Natural Hair

Next Post

January 28, 2014 A Decade of Wardrobe Malfunctions: Social Media and Pseudo-Adulthood

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz