‘Top Chef: Masters’ Celebrates The Communal Nature Of Art

Last updated on: August 16, 2013 at 7:30 am by Geoffrey Reiter

‘Top Chef: Masters’ Celebrates The Communal Nature Of Art 2013-08-16T05:02:41-06:00 Geoffrey Reiter

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

After Project Runway bolted to Lifetime in 2009, Top Chef became Bravo’s signature reality competition series. As such, the network has sought to capitalize on the show’s popularity by creating various spinoffs, such as the sweet-tooth confection Top Chef: Just Desserts or the recent Life After Top Chef. Arguably the noblest entry in this cavalcade of successors, however, is Top Chef: Masters, which follows a format similar to the original show but features contestants who are already well-established and respected chefs.

I have always enjoyed Top Chef: Masters, perhaps even more than Top Chef itself. Of course, with such successful and prominent restauranteurs as contestants, egos can lead to some tensions. Nonetheless, the episodes over the past five years tend to be marked by a greater sense of professionalism than one often finds in the up-and-coming competitors in Top Chef, who feel they have more to prove and are thus often more fiercely aggressive. This aggression results in countless interpersonal conflicts of the type that Bravo execs doubtless love, fodder for the network’s Andy Cohen on Watch What Happens Live after each episode. Personally, however, I prefer the camaraderie that often develops among the master chefs in each battle. Their reputations are already secure, and there is no direct financial reward (prize winnings go to the contestants’ selected charities); in general, they are competing for personal honor and love of their craft.

All of which makes this new season’s wrinkle — each chef is required to bring one sous-chef to assist in the competition — additionally fascinating. In some sense, the inclusion of the sous-chefs resembles season 11 of Project Runway, in which every episode featured a team challenge of some sort. But in Project Runway, the team format was clearly a calculated move on the producers’ part to cultivate discord rather than unity. In competitive reality TV series, team challenges are almost synonymous with backbiting and personal vitriol, leading to awkward judging sessions where former teammates throw one another under the bus. On this season of Top Chef: Masters, however, the dynamic is entirely different. After all, the teams are not arbitrarily assigned by networks, hosts, or judges; they are extensions of existing working groups. It remains to be seen whether the stress of competition will put undue strain on the relationships between the master chefs and their understudies. There have already been some small gripes from competitors whose sous-chefs have placed them in bad situations.

Even so, I find this latest innovation to be largely positive. America is a nation that tends toward individualism, and our reality competitions frequently underscore this. But most successful restaurants rely on a community of workers: owners, chefs, waitstaff, even dishwashers. Similarly, most great artists and artisans are seldom lone wolves in real life: they learn either through a supportive but critical network of peers (e.g., the Inklings) or through a period of apprenticeship (as Shakespeare learned the theater business) — or, frequently, through both.

In Top Chef: Masters‘ 5th season, then, the success of the chefs is not based solely on their individual performances; it also derives from the extent to which they have been good mentors and teachers. It presents chefs as artists who care enough to pass down their craft to a new generation, and in turn, the sous-chefs have the opportunity to compete on a much grander scale than might otherwise be available to them. It reveals the value and necessity of mentoring, and that good art and craftsmanship flourish best as a communal effort.

Previous Post

August 15, 2013

ELSEWHERE: Tragic Texts, Tragic Art

Next Post

August 16, 2013 Shaming Sexists and Racists Online as a Form of Justice?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz