Is Arrested Development Just a Funny Show and Nothing More?

Last updated on: June 5, 2013 at 9:28 am by S. L. Whitesell

Is Arrested Development Just a Funny Show and Nothing More? 2013-06-05T09:28:19-06:00 S. L. Whitesell

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Noah Glyn at NRO argues that Arrested Development is just a funny show: “A funny show. That’s it and nothing more. Not a metaphor for anything. Not an explication of anything, either.” Because the show receives lavish amounts of attention, none of which can refrain from searching the depths of the show’s plot, dialogue, set, and joke patterns for a deeper meaning. As a result, Glyn diagnoses society as delusional and obsessed. He goes on to criticize an admittedly silly post on WaPo’s Wonkblog titled “‘Arrested Development’ Was a Communist Utopia and Season Four Ruined It.”

The show’s only real theme is the pettiness of the Bluth family, their visceral self-interest occasionally trumped by their unique personality flaws (insecurity, materialism, laziness). So a line like “the show’s underlying progressive optimism about the basic decency of the people” is a real side-splitter.

We can all have a good laugh at the self-styled Jacobins trying to appropriate a show to their optimistically progressive rationalism. Brotherhood of man and all that. It’s funny when someone reads in to a story something that isn’t really there, especially when we think those people are pretty silly already.

But is Arrested Development really just a funny show? The statement smacks of naivete, of the young man who insists that his unrequited love is purely platonic. “Just a joke” doesn’t work for hurtful words and it doesn’t apply to media either. I suspect that very few screenwriters or producers go through the trouble of writing television purely for laughs. Comedy is the medium, not the message. Even if a writer tried to do this, he would invariably tell a story through the lens of some narrative or, oh please no, churn out some postmodern meta-narrative attempting to deconstruct the genre. Or whatever it is those people are trying to do.

The problem is not that these critics are reading something where there is nothing; there is never “nothing”. The problem is reading the wrong thing in. Complicating matters, we tend to read ourselves in to criticisms as well. So when someone like Glyn (or me) reads the WaPo column, we are primed to see the worst in the liberal (in this case literally socialist) media and pounce. There is a difference between an argument that says “this story can be used to illustrate this point” and “the people who wrote this story were trying to illustrate this point.” The first, using a particular narrative as a metaphor, is perfectly fine, but the writer should be careful to make clear what’s going on. The second is another claim entirely, one that is harder to substantiate and will certainly open you to justified ridicule.

We strive to exegete—to read out of—the Bible, and we should do the same with all messages. The stakes are lower in misunderstanding a once-and-future canceled TV show, but that doesn’t mean we’re free to do whatever we want with it. Likewise with the words of others who may appear to be misinterpreting something we value—we must take care to properly characterize the characterization, lest we be guilty of the great sin of Triple Ironic Metahypocrisy.

Of the Moment

Television

Previous Post

June 5, 2013

The Scandal With 'Scandal': It Doesn't Do A Better Job Of Tackling Racial Differences

Next Post

June 5, 2013 ELSEWHERE: Google Glasses - No Porn Allowed

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz