The Kiddy Pool: In Praise of Ordinary Children

Last updated on: April 30, 2013 at 7:53 pm by Erin Wyble Newcomb

The Kiddy Pool: In Praise of Ordinary Children 2013-04-30T19:53:30-06:00 Erin Wyble Newcomb

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every week in The Kiddy Pool, Erin Newcomb confronts one of many issues that parents must deal with related to popular culture.

Intelligence in our children, whether normal or advanced, is in no way a virtue.

In last week’s The Atlantic, Olga Khazan related a research study about parents’ descriptions of their children; it turns out, unsurprisingly, that the way we describe our children reflects what we value in our respective cultures. As Khazan states: “Americans also seem preoccupied with their children’s smarts from an extremely young age” and “American parents were the only ones to consistently mention their children’s advanced intellect.” The American preoccupation with early academic enrichment provides fertile ground for an entire market of “baby genius” products designed to (over)stimulate the prodigy latent within all our offspring. One of the many problems with overemphasizing our children’s intellect is that we take the mind out of proportion and context with the body and spirit. We are also playing the fool; most of us are average, not geniuses, and our children are average too.

There was some behind-the-scenes debate about the terms used to describe children in the study. One of our CAPC contributors thought “regular”—a word choice designated by many European parents, referred to the consistency of a child’s bowel movements. I see no reason to underestimate the importance of that sort of childhood regularity, but I interpreted it to mean ordinary or average. You know, just a regular kid. It’s just that no one wants to be, or to produce, ordinary people. We cling to the belief that our children are exceptional because it makes us, their parents, exceptional too. So we over-praise, and tell them how special they are. We lose sight of the fact that their uniqueness and specialness in the context of our lives and families does not make them superior anywhere else. Nor is intelligence, average or advanced, in any way a virtue, but sometimes we pretend that it is.

As a college instructor who regularly teaches first-year students, I see what my profession calls “the snowflakes” all the time. A generation assured of their uniqueness since birth. Each one a special snowflake, but I can’t see for the blizzard. What happens next is the big fish/small pond syndrome, where, as children move into adulthood and into larger circles of the world, (like from high school to college), they start to realize that they are now surrounded by others who are used to being the best. There’s more competition and less room at the top, and it doesn’t stop with college. So what happens to the snowflakes groomed for a lifetime on their exceptionality? Superlatives are exclusive: only one person can be the smartest. But there is plenty of room for people who are persistent and kind. And really, who could argue that our world needs less goodness, less compassion?

When I look at the lists of characteristics to describe the children, it’s hard not to notice that “happy” didn’t make the cut for the American chart, but “intelligent,” “cognitively advanced,” “asks questions” (a trait admired by Americans and seen as needy by the Dutch), and “rebellious” did. What these graphs reveal are the universal belief that our culture (whatever one we happen to call home) knows the best way to rear children and the particular ways that cultures differ in parenting practices. We need to attain a critical distance, to step back and examine the values we impart to our children—not what we say, but what we model each day. Why those values? How do they reflect on us as parents, and for whose benefit are we perpetuating them? I know in my heart of hearts that if my child is a genius who does not love God, who feels no sense of vocation, no purpose to do good in this world, then I will have done her a disservice. A high IQ is not a requirement for serving or loving God. What happens if we see parenthood as the training of souls at least as much as the molding of minds? After all, God is not going to examine our children’s transcripts someday. He is going to examine their hearts—as well as ours.

Asides

Of the Moment

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 16, 2013

Music Matters: In Search of 90’s CCM that Doesn’t Suck

Next Post

April 16, 2013 Podcast #117: The Gosnell Tragedy, How Sex Affects Faith, "Accidental Racist"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz