Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Christ and Pop Culture

Does History Channel’s The Bible Live up to Its Promise?

Last updated on: March 14, 2013 at 10:00 am   by Geoffrey Reiter

Does History Channel’s The Bible Live up to Its Promise? 2013-03-14T09:02:41-06:00 Geoffrey Reiter

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Two competing emotions welled up inside me when I first learned that the History Channel would be making a ten-hour miniseries that followed the storyline of the Bible from Genesis to Jesus: hope and fear.  The Bible, as it is straightforwardly called, is the brainchild of Touched by an Angel alum Roma Downey and her husband, producer Mark Burnett.  Each episode follows several events from the biblical narrative in basically sequential order, culminating in the life of Jesus Christ and the formation of the first-century church.  It is among the most ambitious cable television projects attempted to date, and its first episode last Sunday drew an estimated 13.1 million viewers, making it cable TV’s most popular fare for 2013 thus far.

My hope upon reading the first reports about The Bible was that an established television producer creating what was billed as a faithful adaptation of Scripture for a channel with no religious predisposition could lead to a show that was a cut above the generic evangelical attempts at media proselytizing.  My fear was that it would fail both in theology and spectacle: after all, Downey’s Touched by an Angel was a gentle but often saccharine series of dubious orthodoxy, and most of Burnett’s credits are in the realm of reality TV.  The fact that Joel Osteen was among those consulted on the project certainly didn’t reassure me.

Thus far, I find The Bible neither the cinematic triumph of my wildest hopes nor the preachy video sermon of my darkest fears.  I appreciate the task Burnett and Downey are attempting: to demonstrate that Jesus’s birth, life, death, and resurrection were the climax of a great narrative, the telos of generations who trusted God’s promise and looked forward to Messiah’s coming.  To its credit, The Bible never loses this thread—it is consistent in its thematic attention to an approach to the Old Testament that is both literal and typological in nature, assuming the events really happened as the Bible depicts them but seeing them as foreshadowing the fulfillment that Christ represents.  Though there are certainly several glaring absurdities present (my own exegesis of Genesis 19 somehow missed the Asian ninja angel at Sodom), The Bible overall really seems to be making a good faith effort to depict its subject accurately and symbolically.  In the process, however, the show often glides over or elides entirely the complexities of its key characters.  Abraham is permitted some legitimate wrestling with his faith, as he concedes to Sarah in taking Hagar to produce an heir or agonizes about sacrificing Isaac.  But his deception in Egypt is never mentioned, and the extent of Sarah’s ill treatment of Hagar is only alluded to.  Moses is glossed even more; Zipporah is never mentioned, while Aaron acts primarily as a passive sidekick, not as a God-appointed spokesman who initiates rebellions against both Moses and God himself.

In trying to present the biblical narrative in its fullness, then, The Bible (at least in its early stages) threatens to collapse from the weight of its own ambitions.  Indeed, it is really not ambitious enough, for a miniseries just doesn’t seem enough time to give the stories the gravity they deserve.  Of course, the biblical texts themselves move quickly and episodically, but as Robert Alter and many other biblical scholars have observed, there is a precision in the compactness of these narratives, words weighted with nuance, suggestion, multiple meanings, giving the Hebrew stories depths that are incommunicable in other media.  Moreover, television narrative is very different from biblical narrative—if the goal is to create a televised story that will dramatize, bring to life, the Bible to a new audience, more time must be spent with individual characters to ensure that their lives onscreen exemplify the messy, human, inspiring, compelling lives that the historical figures obviously lived.

The end result, then, is a drama that plays more like a reenactment-heavy documentary.  The fact that gaps of time are narrated by Keith David, the actor who narrated Ken Burns’s The War, doesn’t help that perception, nor does the clipped length of scenes, racing from event to event, starring largely obscure actors who must make up in overt expressiveness what they lack in screen time.  Though such speculations may be idle, I am genuinely curious as to whether or not The Bible could have worked as a multi-season television series, giving several episodes to dwell on the stories presented.  It should be noted, however, that almost half of the show’s ten hours is devoted to the life of Jesus.  If this is disproportionate relative to the actual page-space allotted the New Testament in Scripture, it gives hope that future episodes could develop a sustained story and characterization with more texture than the early parts.  There are certainly many lines and visual cues in the parts I watched that suggested some Christological payoff down the road.

I can honestly say that I appreciate what Burnett and Downey’s production is attempting, and the result is better than it would have been if made in the standard generic evangelical format.  Hopefully, some viewers will be able to experience a greater appreciation for the rich, sweeping scope of biblical narrative while watching.  Naturally, though, I can’t help wishing it was better and think of ways it could be.  The old maxim is as true with The Bible as with most other films: the book is better than the movie.

Of the Moment

Television

of the moment

Previous Post



March 14, 2013

Why The New Pope Shouldn't Listen to Obama's Advice

Next Post



March 14, 2013 The Moviegoer: "Planet of Snail" and When the Darkness and Silence are with God


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 2 John is addressed to Gaius, the beloved friend.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

CAPC Podcast #4: Hot Pockets, Steven Furtick's Elevation...

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Downton Abbey: People Talk

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Introducing: Christ and Pop Culture, The Podcast

Christ and Pop Culture

Evangelical

Walking with the Dead: Living on Borrowed Faith

Christ and Pop Culture

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube