The Still, Small Voice that Doubts Roe v. Wade

Last updated on: January 28, 2013 at 2:00 pm by Amy Lepine Peterson

The Still, Small Voice that Doubts Roe v. Wade 2013-01-27T22:23:16-07:00 Amy Lepine Peterson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Around the anniversary of Roe v. Wade last week, the New York Times‘ “Motherlode” column ran a piece by freelance writer Christina Loccke about how becoming a mother caused her to question her firmly-held belief in abortion rights. She believes in a woman’s right to choose but when one of her friends, also a mother, told her she was planning an abortion, part of Loccke wanted to say, “Don’t do this. Please.”

In describing her emotional turmoil, Loccke writes, “My choice was either to be true to myself and my politics supporting women, or give in to my emotions as my friends described their choice.” She chooses to keep her reservations to herself and to be “supportive.” (Hopefully, she shared her concerns with those friends before mentioning them on the New York Times website!)

There is certainly a lot that could be said about Loccke’s essay, but it was this simple line describing the division between her head and heart that bothered me most. Somehow, Loccke believes that her true self is separate from her emotional responses. This kind of dualistic separation of the self into “rational” and “emotional,” and the prioritization of the rational, is at its heart an anti-feminist ethos.

In the foundational work Women’s Ways of Knowing, Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, and Tarule (1986) suggest that the practice of prizing knowledge from an external authority over emotional or relational knowledge developed in concert with patriarchal societies. Other ways of “knowing,” such as listening to an “inner voice” and paying attention to what “feels right”—ways that have typically been associated with women—have been undermined.

Loccke, if she’s a feminist, ought to be more willing to listen to that still, small voice in her soul.

And Christians, if we’re honest, need to acknowledge that God reveals himself through both reason and emotion. After all, when the resurrected Christ spoke with the men on the road to Emmaus, he reasoned with them, explained the Scriptures, and what happened?

Their hearts burned within them.

Previous Post

January 28, 2013

In Praise of Memorizing Poetry

Next Post

January 29, 2013 Music Matters: The Voice of the Fatherless in Hip-Hop

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz