Sacred Space: The Church vs. Naturalism

Last updated on: September 14, 2012 at 7:27 am by Brad Williams

Sacred Space: The Church vs. Naturalism 2012-09-14T07:27:35-06:00 Brad Williams

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Every Friday in Sacred Space, Brad Williams explores the place of popular culture in the local church.

Adam: the first man to be told by a woman to stop messing up her hair.

One of the present challenges to the church is compelling narrative of naturalism. By naturalism, I mean the idea that everything always has and always will be governed by “natural” laws. In this worldview, science is naturally king because its business is to study that which is observable. So if one never observes a miracle, why should it ever be taken into account in a naturalistic worldview? Naturalists can very easily regulate miracles into one of two realms: 1) They are the stuff of fantasy because most naturalists have never observed one and/or 2) just because something looks like a miracle, it doesn’t mean that it is. Science just hasn’t figured out the mechanics of it yet.

This is, it must be admitted, a rational and logical position, and it is quite appealing. Naturalism makes sense of the known universe, at least it makes sense of much of it. And because science is so wonderful, it breeds confidence in the idea that through science we will eventually discover the answers to the things we cannot currently make sense of: like where life comes from or what life “is”.

= 2,190,006 Days, not counting pagan “leap years.”

Let’s take, for example, the naturalistic/atheistic view of evolution. What if I read Genesis One very literally and come to the conclusion that the Earth is indeed very young, maybe only 6,000 years. That is insanity to a naturalist because it goes against everything he observes. So how does a “young earther” have a conversation with a naturalist that doesn’t involve name-calling?

I’m not interested in arguing here about the age of the earth, and I am not really interested in arguing about that with a naturalist. What we are really arguing about is whether or not there are miracles. It is as absurd to the naturalist for me to claim that Jesus rose from the dead after three days as it is for me to claim that the earth is young. It is equally ridiculous to the naturalist for me to claim that Elisha made an iron axe head float by tossing a twig into a creek, or that Elijah called down fire from heaven, or that Peter raised Tabitha from the dead by taking her hand and telling her to wake up.

Scientist discovers Earth, on a chalkboard.

When you get to the heart of the matter, the church’s issue with science is not that science is bad. God did create an orderly universe that functions very rationally most of the time. This universe can be studied like a book, and sometimes in the course of study it will reveal to us its secrets. The problem is really miracles. It is possible that God made the world and all the universe instantaneously 6,000 years ago. Or that He did it one minute ago. If a naturalist concedes that this is possible if there exists an omnipotent, all-powerful being then we have simply reached an impasse. After all, people believe all sorts of crazy things and still manage to function as productive members of society.

So how does the church overcome such a system of thought? First, she has to recognize that she cannot out argue a naturalist. We are at an impasse. Second, she has to recognize that the issue really is God’s existence and the idea that He intervenes or creates miraculously, that He is above science and cannot be found or proven by science. He is beyond our reason, but that does not mean He is unreasonable.

Scientist discovers spaceship, also on chalkboard.

Finally, in an age where miracles are rare and cannot be scientifically examined even if they weren’t, we have to remember that becoming a Christian is, in itself, a miracle. No one is a Christian because they figured out life, creation, and the age of the Earth. People are Christians because God intervened in their lives, brought life to their soul, and even now bears witness to their spirit that they are God’s children. The new birth is a miracle, and the only way anyone ever experiences it is when the church preaches the gospel.

Asides

General Culture

sacred space

Previous Post

September 11, 2012

The Kiddy Pool: Parenting in the Big Picture

Next Post

September 17, 2012 The Citizenship Confusion's Voter's Guide to the Internets

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Asides Elsewhere Featured Film Games General Culture Headline Literature Music Of the Moment Podcast Politics RetroPost Sports Technology Television Uncategorized Viral

Select a Month February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz